this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
20 points (70.0% liked)

Privacy

46964 readers
356 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 16 points 3 hours ago

Ah another hitpiece on Signal huh? They must be doing a lot right.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 hours ago

How does this compare to salaries for comparable positions at comparable for-profit companies?

It's kinda the point of donations that they can afford to hire people whose labor costs that much.

[–] glitching@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

not my circus, not my monkeys

but them positions... as mr. cici famously quipped, that's alot of buffers

you really need a VP of eng and then a director of eng and further liaisons until you reach an actual engineer for a shop that has one product?

again, what do I care, spend it in good health

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't 1M per year upper middle class in america now?

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Damn, I don't think I'll make 1M in my lifetime combined.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 minutes ago

That's because you live in Europe and stretching a month's paycheck is easier than a week's and the Euro is an strogner currency with better anti-gouging laws.

To sum up, 70k euros a month is a lot.

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

“President of Signal getting paid less than a principal engineer” must be the take here.

The same argument applies to Wikipedia: it’s a blessing these people accept working for <1M. They could easily get a job for triple the salary elsewhere but choose to forfeit it for principles.

[–] albsen@beehaw.org 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

is the argument they shouldn't be paid money for their work? or maybe signal shouldn't be hiring at competitive salaries for highly skilled labor?

[–] rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago

Well, the only person on the list with "developer" in their title has the lowest salary, the executives are paid more. And you will not in a million years convince me that corporate suits are doing skilled work in a way to deserve more compensation than people actually making the product.

[–] lemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

What would be the downside if all companies were non-profit? At first sight, it sounds like a great idea.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 1 points 47 minutes ago

The conventional answer is that there would be much less incentive to fund new ones.

Some things need a large investment to start: power plants, cities, factories, space stations, etc. Sometimes more money than the people involved can afford, and you need to ask someone to front the money, they typically get paid with a share of the profits.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Some companies will be invisible and/or "boring" - nobody ever said: "Oh, I just love my office building's cleaning supplies delivery contractor, I should donate them again!"

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

To be fair non-profit doesn't mean you can't charge for your services. You just can't pay profit out as dividends so there's no incentive to overcharge.

[–] raicon@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

What a scam...

Hey guys I help orphans on a non profit, I'm a very good person. BTW I get paid 1M a year

[–] glitzer_gadze@feddit.org 4 points 5 hours ago

Unbearable: This was the last time i donated to signal. Next time i'll donate to some small foss-projects.

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 hours ago (3 children)
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh. I've always liked Matrix (and was not bothered too much by the metadata leaks because my home server was not federated anyways), but after noticing some issues and finally reading up on the actual protocol spec a couple of weeks ago... oof. Yeah. No.

Set up XMPP for now. Works really well and the protocol seems so much saner. Unfortunately, it too has some annoyances that are unacceptable to me in the long term. I'm this close to saying "fuck it" and wasting the next couple of years of my life on a new protocol that no one is gonna use. (Cue the XKCD here.)

[–] SwooshBakery624@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Works really well and the protocol seems so much saner.

Unfortunately, it is not.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 2 points 2 hours ago

Ha, thanks, I'd already read that. And I do, mostly, agree; the OMEMO implementation is not great both from the security perspective discussed in the post, as well as the UX (not being able to decrypt old messages on new devices at all).

That being said, I primarily want a selfhosted, federated messenger which also takes privacy and security seriously, and at least for the former, XMPP is really refreshingly good.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

They're still far more encrypted than literally every other alternative.

[–] leviathan@feddit.org 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Meanwhile Discord in it's entirety is unencrypted

[–] voxel@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

To be fair, Discord has e2e encrypted voice calls using their "Dave" protocol.

https://discord.com/blog/meet-dave-e2ee-for-audio-video

[–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

Hey it worked