388
submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] joeyv120@ttrpg.network 61 points 1 year ago

We need more good suicidal guys with guns to stop bad suicidal guys with guns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That makes sense because of mishandling, mismanagement, and.. Wanting to die sometimes...

Most flight incidents happen on departure and arrival so of course most gun mishaps happen at home.

Guess what I'm saying is it all makes sense one way or the other.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I got downvoted real bad when I pointed this out to someone who said "making guns illegal just takes them away from people who need to defend themselves."

The defense excuse of gun ownership is a myth. It causes way more harm than good.

[-] aksdb@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

That aside: the easier it is for good guys to get a gun, the easier it is for bad guys too.

And: where does that idea of a good guy stopping a bad guy come from even? If the bad guy is the better shoot, he still wins the fight. If he catches the good guy by surprise (which is likely given that bad acts are an action and not a reaction), he also has the upper hand.

So more guns solves exactly nothing, it only increases risks everywhere.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackout@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago

Legalize doctor assisted suicide. Let people end their lives with dignity.

[-] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Bruh I'd vote for this

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] m13@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Late stage capitalism is alienating. Many people are faced with the reality that there’s little point to live when your only purpose is to be a wage slave for billionaires. There are no prospects of owning a home or being comfortable ever unless you’re born into wealth or willing to exploit others and put them into bad situations just so you can have a bit of comfort.

[-] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And if you get behind, there's the stigma among conservatives about getting a helping hand. Bootstraps and all that, it's sad.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 33 points 1 year ago

"Means Matter"

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/means-matter/means-matter/

Reducing access to more lethal means of suicide reduces deaths by suicide in a population. The data on this is unequivocal.

That's because the majority of suicidal crises are spontaneous and of absurdly short duration, on the order of around 20 minutes. If you interrupt the process between decision and action, people survive. And 90% of people who survive a suicide attempt never go on to die by suicide at any future point in their lives.

[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

A lot of people talking about means seem to be side stepping the fact that life is getting harder and that's probably why suicides are going up.

The means do matter, but the means aren't driving the wave we've seen this decade. Most suicides are finances and loneliness related. And even if someone does survive an attempt using another mean, the "help" is usually involuntary institutionalization which will make your life even worse. Even getting a driver's license is harder after that.

Not to discredit the means, I just think we need to take a hard look at everything surrounding said means. Society needs to fail someone 1,000 times before they pick up the final societal failure.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Social media is pretty poisonous for people, and has led to some extreme levels of alienation between people caught up in it and their close friends and family (which is the historical support network).

So people who see the world more like the strangers they have no practical connection with and obsess over the ways in which they see the world differently from those they actually have connections with leads to a very dark place.

There's a number of different factors going on, but I remember seeing private market research around two years ago at the striking divide even within households and realizing we were headed towards serious problems.

Everything is extremist, categorized by binary teams, and outrage driven.

That's not a recipe for a healthy social life, and not having a healthy social life or feeling apart from those in one's life can be devastating on mental health.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Dizzirron@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Prioritize your health y'all, these are no doubt strange times.

[-] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

There's less and less reason to be alive. What the fuck is there to live for?

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

What are you talking about?! There’s so much more profit you can generate for the shareholders!!

[-] Farticles@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

But if you end it all now, think of all the debt you’re missing out on!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Those people just need a Good Guy With a Gun to kill them before they killed themselfs!

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is by miles the worst firearm issue America has. Naive laws banning types of guns, magazine capacity, all that, do nothing for nearly half of all gun deaths.

Example after example shows that so much as inconveniencing a suicide is often enough to stop them. Guns are point and click. They are literally the most convenient way to surely die. This is why I didn't own a gun until I was 39, and most were bought recently at 50 or so. I wasn't mentally stable enough.

And if anyone wants to come in here screaming, "BAN all the things!", just don't. The 2A exists and the courts uphold it as an individual right, those are facts and not open to argument. And besides, I don't hear anyone screaming about a handgun ban. Long guns, shotguns/AR-15's/whatever, are something like 4% of gun deaths. Let's focus on reducing the most harm.

So what now? We somehow test people to practice their rights? There are plenty for whom I'd like to yank the 1A and the franchise. But I'm sorry, people are free to speak and vote in this country.

And if we impose some sort of test, what's the criteria, who administers it, who judges the results? What if one passes and later becomes suicidal?

I already know the answer to that one. Gun laws have always been, and always will be, racist. Don't take my word! Please look around for yourself on this one.

And don't start me with red flag laws, I know exactly how those would work out. Imagine vengeful exes, modern Brown Shirts, cops you pissed off, fuck me, even neighbors that are annoyed with you. While we're at it, let's just chunk the 4A right out the window.

Someone invariably starts talking mental health. And I'm 100% down with that, just as I am some form of universal health care. But here's the thing with the mentally ill, they often don't know they're sick or are too sick to go get help, even if it's free.

This is one of the most intractable problems in America, and I don't have a clue what can be done about it.

Anyone? I'm listening.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yea, we definitely need a two-pronged (or more) approach to tackle it in the US. Mental health would go a loooooong way for both the suicides and mass shootings.

Red flag laws are just fine when written correctly. That's a ridiculous fear-mongering point. Not all of them are the same nor have the same agencies calling any shots.

You don't have a clue because you're being a pessemist about proven impacts. Red flag laws that target domestic violence and clinical depression have demonstrable impact on the problem. It's intractible because people like you refuse to accept that a step in the right direction is better than nothing. Your attitude is quite pathetic, and you are part of the problem when you go on about how nothing can be done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

And if anyone wants to come in here screaming, “BAN all the things!”, just don’t.

vs

This is one of the most intractable problems in America, and I don’t have a clue what can be done about it.

The 2nd amendment needs to go on the dustbin of history. I'm not saying people can't own guns, but the right to should disappear.

"But that's not realistic", you might say. Sure, it's not going to happen any time soon but I think the US will get there eventually.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe I agree, maybe I don't. Not 100% sure myself. But adding a constitutional amendment is unthinkable ATM. We couldn't pass an amendment making every 2nd Saturday of March "Chocolate Chip Cookie Day".

What I'm getting at is this: There is zero use talking about dumping the 2A, and neither your opinion nor mine will matter for decades to come. That discussion is off the table. And that's not fatalism, it's reality.

So again; Guns and suicide. Hell we do right now today?

All I got is health care, education, raising the poor from poverty, all the things conservatives won't let us have. Feeling so hopeless on this front, reaching out to anyone that has so much as a baby step.

[-] Crismus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

99% of our gun issues are due to intractable poverty and inequality. 50 years ago we didn't have these issues because Corporations were not so overbalanced. There were perks to many jobs because taxes were very high on profits.

Fix the extreme poverty, housing, and take-home pay and most of these social issue will disappear. The rich and powerful ( Corpos and people) want people to give up rights because their problem is about control more than money.

Giving up rights won't change any suicides because there is no more hope in the US anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] assplode@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

I am in a similar situation with my guns. I have two antique long guns. They're locked up, in the crawl space, and I don't keep any ammo in my house.

I have depression and I don't trust myself not to use my guns to kill myself. For me, the inconvenience of accessing them and obtaining ammo feels like a safe compromise.

I agree that this is an enormous problem with no easy solutions.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Good for you! Keep it that way until long after you feel more sane. Might take years, might never happen, but you know yourself. Keep on keeping on!

[-] BanditMcDougal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You're right, and you're going to get downvoted for it. We have an inequality problem masking as a gun problem. We have a mental health crisis masking as gun problem.

Possible solutions to these situations aren't fast and they don't stir up emotions enough to get people to vote for you. Riling people up and telling them you can fix their problems fast gets votes; saying we have work to do doesn't.

The stigma against mental healthcare won't be gone in my child's generation, but I am happy to see it is being accepted more than it was for mine. Of course, not thinking poorly of people for taking care of themselves doesn't matter if people can't afford to...

[-] assplode@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

We have an inequality problem masking as a gun problem. We have a mental health crisis masking as gun problem.

Hard agree. People would not be killing themselves in droves if these issues weren't present.

We have a shitload of guns in this country. Nothing is going to change that.

While I think we do need more strict gun ownership laws, they're not going to change the amount already in people's hands. Nor will they make people less miserable.

What we need are tangible improvements in people's lives. Improved wages. Lower housing costs. Affordable healthcare. Quality, free treatment for addiction.

These are the things that will keep people from killing themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] ExfilBravo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Lift Your Head Up High (And Blow Your Brains Out).

[-] diybone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You don't hear a good bloodhound gang reference often.

[-] Pulptastic@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

Unprecedented... so far.

[-] schwim@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

Well, it is an efficient manner.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

If only there were some way to predict these sorts of outcomes….

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, at this point the only thing not increasing in price bullets, so I get it.

[-] VelvetGentleman@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This guy hasn't bought ammo recently.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe you can ask them to sell you an individual one or see if they give out free samples.

[-] MisterSteve@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The ultimate "my body, my choice." Guess Republicans will now favor gun control, after all.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
388 points (97.1% liked)

News

23627 readers
2475 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS