this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026

137 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6201 readers

2143 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

VerbFlow@lemmy.world

MrMcGasion@lemmy.world

TootSweet@lemmy.world

BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world

cynar@lemmy.world

drmeanfeel@lemmy.world

pavnilschanda@lemmy.world

CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world

WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world

Communist@lemmy.ml

eatCasserole@lemmy.world

SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world

NutWrench@lemmy.world

Soup@lemmy.cafe

iAvicenna@lemmy.world

Tinks@lemmy.world

wizblizz@lemmy.world

corus_kt@lemmy.world

Prandom_returns@lemm.ee

JimSamtanko@lemm.ee

TrickDacy@lemmy.world

TheFriar@lemm.ee

ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com

HawlSera@lemm.ee

andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works

MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works

33550336@lemmy.world

Nougat@fedia.io

Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world

Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world

Quill7513@slrpnk.net

glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz

e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de

ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social

137

I searched CachyOS vs Fedora on YouTube and all I found was AI Slop 🙄 (media.piefed.social)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When you play either of these videos it’s just a AI voice talking over someone just clicking around. The scripts are also so similar.

The internet is dying.

top 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

Youtube isn't really feeling it recently, isn't it? For any topic the recommenrdation system is skewed. I used to find lectures recorded from the likes MIT and other institution in the recommended, now there's fully AI generated videos. Once you get in the AI pipeline getting out of it is ridicoulusly hard. As for your little OS related question, i always read the documentation before making choices. Seeing the way it works should give you more than enough.

[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I always access youtube through GrayJay, PipePipe or FreeTube, and rarely see these random AI slop recommendations.

[–] Renat@szmer.info 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago) (1 children)

Which of these 3 do you recommend?

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 minutes ago

I like grayjay. Works for more than just YouTube and has sponsorblock built in

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter what topic you search... that's all YouTube recommendations are anymore.

YouTube is still decent if you can ignore their recommendations. I use other apps (Pipepipe, Grayjay) and my feed is just the creators I want. No ads, no slop, no nonsense. It's like YouTube was 20 years ago.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

Yep I use that too,back to the good old days! Internet was so good then.

Ublock huge blocklist, private DNS, and VPN are essential to me using the internet today.

Hard to believe not everyone on the internet does this. Its like they enjoy slop. Then again people still use x so..there's not really hope for humanity lol

[–] MinFapper@startrek.website 1 points 13 hours ago

At that point why not just use something like nebula?

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

YouTube is like Imgur, it's a media dump. Most of it is trash. If you're going to YouTube from any place other than a community link recommendations or to your known curated channels; then it is no surprise that you come across shit 90% of the time.

The fact that their search function fails to find relevant guides or tutorials is a real loss, but they've opted to enshittify.

[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

An advertisement company built off the work of a search engine can't get search right on arguably their biggest app. Baffling.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 4 points 22 hours ago

They're search has been shit for a long time. It has helped other search engines though. My brothers resisted leaving Google because they found the search quality was best. Now it's shit enough for them to consider that DDG does just as good a job.

Allowing their search and video platform to get flooded by AI is insane, but they're fully committed because they're chasing their own AI agenda so they can't really stand against AI. Amazon has done the same by allowing their platform to be flooded with cheap, useless, generic products and fake reviews. The real baffling thing is why people still keep using (and even worshipping) these asshole companies.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

You have a misunderstanding of what "get search right" means. For Google's profits, the search is exactly the way they want it to be. They don't give a shit whether it's actually useful to you or not.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Shoutout to blocktube: https://github.com/amitbl/blocktube

Usually, the same "few" slop channels dominate a specific topic, so add them to a blocklist and the filtering gets reasonably good.

It's absolutely insane that YouTube doesn't allow this as a native feature.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, seeing a stock photo guy or woman in a thumbnail nowadays screams AI-generated content. I stay away from those at all costs to prevent YouTube deciding to recommend me more

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I mean, a lot of the real YouTubers don't look much different from a stock photo...

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are plenty of quality channels out there. Maybe it takes a bit longer to find them but it's possible.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Any you can recommend to help me with my comparison?

[–] blueberry_793@lemmings.world 4 points 1 day ago

"ITSFOSS" is nice for beginners to Linux

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Explaining Computers and The Linux Experiment are among my favourites.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

I was going to recomend Explaining Computers. Been watching him for years. Also, for more linux stuff, @LearnLinuxTV is another good channel.

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

TheBlackDon, laustoic, breadonpenguins, or if you REALLY want a good breakdown between distros I highly recommend SuperUser Tech. He pretty much goes through a lot of distros from the perspective of someone new to Linux and his videos are very thorough.

TonyBTW is great when you're looking to setup whatever distro you pick. he's pretty much done them all. Veronica Explains is also good for other various Linux stuff and setups. and if you ever go down the path of NixOS then Vimjoyer is a must subscribe to learn that distro.

[–] Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

I'll check it out thanks

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

I want to believe that using invidious-based frontends tend to circumvent the perfidious google method to position first those that pay for positioning.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Imho, the rolling VS point release, desktop environement and X11/Wayland has much more impact than "the distro" choice

Stick with a more popular and try different desktop environnements

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There are ublock lists which block lots of ai content from loading,maybe look into that

[–] Damage@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Soon we'll need uAllow, only open what is on safe lists

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

That's pretty much NoScript or uBlock's "hard mode."

I prefer "medium mode", but ublock hides it behind a few somewhat cryptic steps:

https://github.com/gorhill/ublock/wiki/Blocking-mode:-medium-mode

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

don't think there's any public list of AI slop youtube channels, or that kinda crowd sourced youtube channel blocklist system. the ublock lists usually block a specific website.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 2 points 23 hours ago

YouTube going down the crapper at record pace.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

"That's crazy man."

[+] Retail4068@lemmy.world -17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We're they wrong?

I couldn't care less if not. Low cost accurate documentation sounds fantastic.

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How do you know it’s accurate? Have you verified it?

[+] Retail4068@lemmy.world -13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nope. How do you know someone not using AI for voice overs is accurate. What's the difference?

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago

The difference is the amount of effort expended on the video. If you actually make the video yourself, you want a good return on your time. That means - usually - that you don't want the majority of your comments to be about how your facts are wrong, because you want people to come back and watch more of your videos.

AI channels, on the other hand, don't care at all. They don't need subscribers. They don't need likes. They're just putting out high volumes of crap content with clickbait titles to get whatever scraps they can sucker out of people. They know they won't ever get recurring visitors, so they don't need to fact-check anything. And AI has made it so that they can churn out this content ridiculously fast and make it nearly indistinguishable from quality content at first glance, at minimal cost.

If it takes you hours to make your video, I'm more likely to want to hear what you're saying. AI videos are an attack against our attention; it takes less effort to make than it does to consume, now, and the quality of the content reflects that.

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The person behind a slop channel will have a tendency to not verify their facts or have updated information on the topic in the first place thus more likely of having misguided information. And not to speak how an LLM spits out very generic shit even if you prompt it to go in depth.

For a real channel, I can hold the person accountable and responsible for spreading misinformation or help them expand their knowledge. The creator, using that feedback, can make corrections and improve their fact checking and quality control over their content. How do you hold a slop channel accountable whose sole purpose is to generate videos for ad revenue in the short term? That slop channel will not even respond to the comments.

[+] Retail4068@lemmy.world -8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The person behind a slop channel will have a tendency to not verify their facts or have updated information

Horse shit. There is garbage both human and LLM generated.

For a real channel, I can hold the person accountable and responsible for spreading misinformation or help them expand their knowledge

No you can't. You can block them and move on. Or report them. Same options.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Cash grab creators are cash grab creators. Shit will be shit. I would argue that AI makes it a considerable order of magnitude easier to churn out garbage, which makes it a matter of scale.

It's like fake nudes. Back in the days of film photography you could still make fake nudes by physically cutting anf pasting images together. It was considerably more work and low quality. Now you can generate much higher quality fake nudes far far faster, even faking different angles and facial expressions from the input.

That inarguably changes things.

God forbid someone who knows Linux but doesn't have video production skills or a shitty voice generate audio based on a script.

There are tons of alternative options besides using AI to generate voiceover. There's the tried and true "put text on the screen", even just by typing shit in a note taking program as you record.

There's no need to make a video at all if you don't have the skills/resources. People can make blog posts, websites, posts on forums or sites like this very one where they just type out the text and include screenshots or short video clips where necessary.

And there are plenty of people with negative levels of video production skills and bad voices still fucking doing it anyway.

There is no situation where using AI voice is actually necessary to get the information out.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The point of these LLM videos isn't to provide information, but to farm clicks. They're full of completely made up nonsense mixed with info copied and reworded from real sources.

As an example, when I search for info about the Canon R7 Mark II (a rumored upcoming camera), they seem to paraphrase Canonrumors articles, but the image "slideshow" makes no sense, and they add in all sorts of straight up impossible assertions and specs. But the uploader doesn't care because they've uploaded thousands of these, and a few might make them some nickels.