this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

842 readers
470 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DasRav@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Would you like no measles, or instead would you like measles?" asked mother earth.

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

weak measlets now as a treat for your immune system, or would you like to wait for big measles later?

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, we had first measles, but what about second measles? second-breakfast

[–] ClassIsOver@hexbear.net 14 points 1 month ago

Well yes, they decided to vaccinate with measles instead of against it.

[–] ProgAimerGirl@hexbear.net 13 points 1 month ago

try "so"

or if you are feeling uncharitable, "obviously"

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

~~instead~~ That's Why They Got Measles

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

i can see the confusion. vaccines are demonic. measles come from lord christ jesus. the fever and brain swelling is because angels are blessing the children.

this was all explained thoroughly in my Biology class at Arcadia Tire and Bible College of Greenville, SC.

[–] regul@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

I have family from this area that I have not been on speaking terms with for about a decade. You will never guess why!

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

I fucking hate the media.

[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Always blows my mind that most people would rather have a dead child than an autistic one (even though vaccines don't cause autism).

[–] Pastaguini@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would argue that the most insidious word in this headline is “shield” because it uncritically grants that there’s something to be protected against.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

In retrospect I should made my title something like "Look at this shit!" Or "Look at this shit! Shield??? Instead???"

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago

I'm not going to be too harsh on this because they probably thought this sounded very clever or funny

[–] JustSo@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Haha my username is finally relevant for a moment.

[–] BeanisBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

Nothing good has ever come from the "parents' rights" movement

Embrace hymenopteran thought, the wellbeing of children is everyone's concern 🐜🐜🐜

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

NYT doesn't know cause and effect.

[–] hellinkilla@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

mission "shield from vaccines": successful

[–] microfiche@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

broccoli instead of cauliflower. blue instead of gold. left instead of right. measles instead of not measles. NBD.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

emergency-room this is what happened to their kids