this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
235 points (96.8% liked)

News

37562 readers
1729 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The first US service members to die in the conflict between the US and Iran were killed by a direct Iranian strike on a makeshift operations center at a civilian port in Kuwait on Sunday morning local time, a source familiar with the situation told CNN.

The death toll from that event at the Shuaiba port has since risen to six, US Central Command announced on Monday afternoon, after the remains of two additional service members were recovered.

Earlier Monday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the strike that killed the service members hit a “tactical operation center that was fortified,” but there was “one” projectile that made it through air defenses. CNN previously reported the event was a suspected drone strike.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 124 points 2 months ago (2 children)

6 US soldiers killed by a draft dodger trying to get us to stop talking about his friendship with Epstein.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 74 points 2 months ago

Meanwhile how many Iranian civilians are dead? This should be in every headline discussing dead US war criminals

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 21 points 2 months ago

I don't think it's the friendship he wants people to stop talking about though, i suspect it's all the children he raped.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So iran strikes active targets in a warzone during a war and the super duper advanced US forces managed to bomb two schools in the first salvo. Brilliant. Who are the bad guys again?

[–] Soulg@ani.social 8 points 2 months ago

It's very obvious that the US is the aggressor even if Iran isn't a nice country, they were literally bending over backwards to meet our demands and it literally meant nothing. It's infuriating

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 45 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How fuckìng dare they, amirite? Bombing those poor souls without a warning and even killing them... They are savages!

Unlike us, who bomb a school and kill some brown kids who were clearly doing terrorist thingies and were a threat because reasons. That was absolutely justified and normal... right?

[–] slackassassin@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The warning sirens were expected from the base not to the base. Jfc.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's so sad... as I said, in the school they bombed, there weren't any sirens.

[–] slackassassin@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It sure sounded like you misunderstood. But yes, killing kids is bad.

[–] rustyfemboy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

at a civilian port

In other words, using human shields.

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Excuse my english but doesnt at mean at and not in?

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Non native English speakers really struggle with at, on, and in. Don't feel bad for being confused it's super, super common, and most non native speakers will struggle with this no matter how fluent they become.

For general example, if somebody is sitting inside an airplane, you can say they're on the plane, or they're in the plane. You could also say they're at the plane, but that's really only used in certain contexts.

In the context you're asking about, "at the port" at and in are synonymous, essentially. The article isn't specific enough so it's reasonable to assume that somewhere within the port's boundary area, fence line perhaps, there was a temporary facility that was bombed.

Since they used the term "at" though, it COULD mean that it was directly outside the port boundaries. Like right outside the fence, perhaps.

Sorry. Not sure if any of this helps.

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

Yes it helped thanks.

[–] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 25 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No warning, no siren

Why is this part of the title? It reads to me as making the attack seem more spooky and scary, but is there any other reason I'm missing?

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a failure of US logistics/preparation. A more competent industrial military would have brought air defense. Starship Troopers was a documentary.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 months ago

They did have air defense, just not the right air defense.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

The US doesn't leave personel exposed without anti air. Most bases have Patriot, THAAD and or CIWIS, at the very least an air raid alarm and bunkers.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Well, in reality it is and should be more spooky and scary. Iran was paying attention to Ukraine. The US seems not to have. This was probably a drone strike. And it evaded the air defenses which were designed for missiles. Somewhere I saw a comparison. A $4 million per missle patriot air defense against a $20k drone. They can send a lot more for a lot less than the US and friends can shoot down. I am sure the US has some better anti drone tech. But probably not enough to protect everything. And it still isn't perfect if they did.

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
Obscene as cancer,
Bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,–
My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desperate glory,
The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
Pro patria mori."

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

These “soldiers” deserve to die for the ~~country~~ capitalists they chose to “protect”

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Suckers and losers for sure.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Of course, if you're fighting for your country and you get shot or hurt, it's a terrible tragedy. Of course, of course. But maybe, maybe if you pick up a gun and go to another country and you get shot… it's not that weird. Maybe, if you get shot by the dude you were just shooting at, it's a tiny bit your fault

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Kind of like how the missiles sent into Iran would have been like, although at least the Iranians attacked US military buildings and not Iranian schools and hospitals like the zionists and their lackeys seem to have done.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait are Israel and the US sending warnings and sirens ahead of their bombs?

Or is this CNN writer just discovering what bombings at wartime look like.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bombable locations often have air raid sirens to alert personnel to seek shelter.

A "tactical operation center that was fortified" ought to have such a thing, whereas a "makeshift operations center at a civilian port in Kuwait" is much less likely to.

The lack of warning speaks to the lies and poor planning of hegseth and other regime goons.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Appreciate the genuine clarification.

I was really referring to the juxtaposed asymmetry of the experience between Iran's populace suddenly wearing bombs and seeing a school of 100+ girls wiped out in an instant with the US-Israeli completely unannounced bombings (not even a declaration of hostilities), and then CNN crying foul at an unannounced bombing on a military target.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 8 points 2 months ago

Good job Iran!

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

Have we got an Epstein Fury Martyrs list yet?

Their service serving interests of pedophiles and war criminals deserve recognition.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 8 points 2 months ago

Oh dear, did you hear that Gaza? 6!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

First acknowledged American casualties in the Pedo War.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No warning, no siren

And at the same time morons have spend the last few years of war in Ukraine to hallucinate about the new transparent battle field that makes so many systems obsolete...

And this exact type of trust me bro idiot is in charge of the US military now.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

Good, may they continue to fail upward until the AmeriKKKan Empire collapses

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I wonder if this will inspire American soldiers to stop following illegal orders. ?

Probably not

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

How dare anybody oppose our war crimes!

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Word on the street is American should be suffering. Regardless of the Iran war.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

Nobody should be suffering you ghoul

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The Orange Perv is trying to escalate things, so that he will have an excuse to remove that inconvenient Constitution here in the states.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe so-called Christians support the president because now we all get to be a little bit like Jesus: We can all die for his sins.

[–] Stormy@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago

Nah they support him because they think he's the anti christ and setting off Armageddon