this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
47 points (98.0% liked)

News

36160 readers
2969 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Firing employees for AI really is the company equivalent of a darwin award huh.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You know that thing where "business majors" entering a company will sell off assets and sabotage operations so they can cash out and fuck off wealthier while leaving a path of destruction in their wake?

I think they just found their newest toy.

They will purge all the productive personnel from a company, enabling them to pocket all the money they used to be wages while operations shamble onward for a few more steps before collapsing under their own weight.

Vaguely reminds me of some gruesome concept like replacing someone's blood with some synthetic oxygen delivery substance and keep them only barely alive enough to also harvest their organs and sell off absolutely every organ and tissue structure in their body worth anything to the black market.

Such companies are already dead. They just don't know it yet.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago

Just found it? Companies like Amazon have been doing layoffs under the guise of AI for a couple years now.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

"...most companies will do the same"

And the minority that won't will survive the shitshow of idiot CEOs falling for a promise of AI -which AI cannot fullfil- just because they hate those icky employees so much.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

It's fun to bash the Stupid CEO Founder because (s)he thinks AI will cut down work and bla bla. Fact is, I was shocked when I read in the article that Block employed 10,000 people. I don't know how many of them are developers, but considering the job cuts were blamed on too many engineers, I assume a lot.

Even at 6,000 people, the company is still chunky for its offering. They seem to have just hired everyone with a pulse after COVID, held on to them because they didn't want to be the only ones that reduced headcount, and are now hitting the brakes.

Sadly, Dorsey is right: the Big Ugly Bill's tax provisions incentivize companies to lay off as many people as possible, since they can keep the profits mostly tax free. They also know the Midterms situation is shaky for them, and while the Democrats won't have the numbers to change tax law against a certain presidential veto, they also won't pass more tax cuts for the super-wealthy.

[–] linule@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, given that software development is so easy nowadays, time to cut reliance on the “tech giants”. We should be able to develop / complete open source or small startups alternatives to Office, mobile operating systems, cloud services, Block, etc.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago

Everyone can "code" today, but it takes a good developer to write good code still. And you need an analytical mind to formulate, check and reformulate the features you want. Basically, the stuff you learn later in your career. If companies get rid of the developers they don't need anymore, I'm not sure where the ones they do need will come from in the future. Not from junior developers gaining experience and leveling their game.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Time to find an alternative to Square….

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lol, everything gonna be vibe coded here shortly. Good luck.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Just hook your company's infrastructure up to OpenClaw....what's the worst that could happen?

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh, I'm not saying it's going to be a good idea. I'm just saying it's happening.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah the last thing I need is my business’ sales system vibe coded by unsupervised glorified clankers

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So.. how does it work, when the world has a 50% unemployment rate?

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In theory: automation makes the few working people massively more productive, so countries as a whole can easily sustain proper social systems even with those numbers.

Reality: Turbo-capitalism says fuck you!

Reality 2: AI is bullshit and not actually able to replace most people. But it will of course not prevent emploee-hating CEOs to do in anyway.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I remember telling people, starting probably in conversations I had in the early 00s, that we should really start having conversations about universal basic income and other considerations about what to do with the rise of radical automation.

I was looked at like a complete loon. I think it's hard to have those conversations even now. It seems some people would rather starve than admit that something that sounds like "Communism" could work and unfettered capitalism does not.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

And not only was there no progress regarding universal income, but basically all productivity increases of the last decades went directly and mostly untaxed to the top. All while wages (and social and health contributions, lots of taxes and sometimes even pensions linked to them) are stagnating.

So we are not only doing nothing to account for that issue, we are in fact already moving in the wrong direction for quite some time. And we are already reaching the point were a lot of Western countries are now loudly telling the fairy tale of how demographics are the problem that makes existing system unsustainable, when in reality the blatant transfer of economic output to the upper 0.X% is the issue.