Good luck! My child is behind 7 proxies!
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
261 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
6246 readers
435 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Age restrictions and id verification side step the real issue that they don't want to deal with.
Actually regulating the companies making these addictive, harmful sites.
The real problem is children on the Internet. The real solution is getting parents to use parental control software.
If you're a full grown adult using Facebook, much less addicted to it, ya get what ya deserve.
Which is the entire point.
Yes, and it's also a bad idea that has no place in a free society for many other reasons.
It's a feature, not a bug. Not sure why so many headlines keep acting like it's some kind of accident.
To reinforce the plausible deniability of politicians of course. It's all about manufacturing consent.
Yep, that's the plan.
It should be obvious by now that governments don't give one fuck about protecting kids. Not one single fuck.
Well... Fucking and children and people associated with power .... We have learned there is no real "not" in this Chain...
Yep, and "age verification" is just a euphemism for identity verification.
What if you buy your child a VPN that is outside of UK?
The Internet was cool while it lasted
We'll just continue to make our own internet with blackjack and hookers. Too much knowledge is already out.
Isn't that just the "dark web"
Yeah, it's also meshtastic, ham, p2p
We've got options and always will.
What're the data rates like on meshtastic and ham? Wasn't looking great when I briefly looked at it.
Meshtastic uses LoRa, so slow speeds but far distance. A better choice is reticulum, this combines LoRa, Wifi HaLow, Wifi 2.4 & 5 GHz and BLE together into one network stack. So in a city we could have faster data speeds all sharing WiFi and rural areas that currently need satellite we could have a connection over far distances wirelessly. Reticulum is also encrypted, meshtastic is not
I mean they're not crazy good by any means, but they could be improved upon. More so speaking of mesh, ham is its own mystery in my brain.
Just examples really of networking outside of the normal infrastructure.
Okay yeah that was the impression I had too. I was excited when I first heard about it but from what I read it didn't seem like you could do much with it. I'm still interested in playing around with it though if I find some free time. Ham didn't really interest me as it requires a license which kind of defeats the purpose of this imo.
Agreed on that front as well.
There has been some progress with data on meshtastic as well as range. For what it is in its current state, it's still pretty awesome imo
I assume unless they just make whitelist of sites you can connect to you can find workarounds.
It's called the deep web in this case. The dark web takes special tools to access, like Tor
The Internet is just a bunch of AS running open source protocols on commercially available infrastructure. It's doing fine. The hosted commercial services might be fucked, but you can run your own.
You're using such a service right now.
no you can't "run your own" for very long if that means you are breaking the law and can be legally punished for not complying with laws like this :(
Corporate needs you to find the difference between [UK] and [China]
They are the same picture .jpg
It’s frustrating that they act like we have privacy right now. The whole situation is typical absurd human behavior.
Considering the recent comments from Merz that is indeed the point
These guys are actually begging for it.
Du hast Fotzenfritz falsch geschrieben
Algorithm-based, ad supported social media is a public health crisis and damages people of all ages. It should be destroyed. At that point we don't have to worry about it's effect on kids or them using VPNs to circumvent age restrictions.
Seems like a more effective solution to me.
The only way to use VPN with how things are going at this rate is through mail in cash or Monero.
With a bit of infrastructure, today you can detect and disrupt any VPN session. This is coming soon to your country, too.
You also can avoid all of these disruptions by camouflaging your packets as some generic protocol, which is already quite easy e.g. in Mullvad by using shadowsocks and ai disruption (randomising, among others, packet size and intervals). In fact, it will always be impossible to detect VPNs without deep packet inspection - and that would require banning ALL internet traffic encryption, which seems unrealistic because of the astronomical downsides, even in today's political situation.
without deep packet inspection
DPI is being used actively in a lot of countries including where I live, sadly
Yeah, I didn't know about that, that sounds terrifying. At least I was still right in saying that they cannot block VPNs completely - you can still send traffic through HTTPS or DNS requests, but it is just too slow for most applications, however definitely enough to be able to communicate with other people in times of censorship. Based on my research Russia is also experimenting with CIDR whitelisting, which is even worse but does have the huge drawback of basically breaking the internet except for a few large sites.
Yet another mullvad W
The global pedofile oligarch greater Israel project noose tightens