this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
394 points (99.5% liked)

World News

54190 readers
2726 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Police arrested a man for a burglary in a city he had never visited after face scanning software deployed across the UK confused him with another person of south Asian heritage.

Alvi Choudhury, 26, a software engineer, was working at the home he shares with his parents in Southampton in January when police knocked on his door, handcuffed him and held him in custody for nearly 10 hours before releasing him at 2am.

Thames Valley police had used automated facial recognition software which matched him with footage of a suspect of a £3,000 burglary 100 miles away in Milton Keynes, according to documents shared with the Guardian by Liberty Investigates.

But the CCTV footage showed a noticeably younger man with different features apart from similar curly hair, said Choudhury, who was left confused about why he had been arrested.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Sounds like the police in Britain has automated arresting people for the "crime" of walking on the street whilst not looking white enough.

Reference material

[–] wax@feddit.nu 35 points 18 hours ago

Vibepolicing

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 day ago

“Age verification”

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s established fact that these racial recognition systems do poorly with virtually any confounding factors, particularly darker skin colour.

10 hours. What the fuck.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The danger of using a product/system for a purpose it wasn't designed for or that didn't pass rigorous testing: poor reliability and serious errors.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago
[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

Choudhury’s mugshot was held on the police system only because he had been wrongly arrested in 2021 when he had been attacked on a night out while at university in Portsmouth. The police released him with no further action. Now he has had a second mugshot taken he is afraid the automated system could trigger more wrongful arrests.

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

RIP actual police work - hello khakis dashboard for just-us

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Palantir is wonderful software.

[–] runsmooth@kopitalk.net 46 points 1 day ago

So police did not have to flag the file as AI generated, and don’t prioritize the review of these allegations by an actual human?

Did anyone tell that man he was unlawfully detained and has a civil claim against the government who knowingly and recklessly detained an innocent person?

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Sue the facial recognition company under product liability

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thames Valley police admitted to Choudhury the arrest “may have been the result of bias within facial recognition technology”. No, the bias wasn’t within the technology.

[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

But the police would have just arrested the nearest ethnic otherwise so it is totally the AI's fault and the manufacturer should compensate travel expenses. /s

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Not too far away now

Please Hold

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Here's what I think the world needs.

Every citizen in every country gets 10 atomic bombs.

Ok so you falsely arrest this man. You don't release him now, because he'll just go get his atomic bombs.

But now his brother or his wife, or whomever, ALSO has atomic bombs. And they demand his release or else.

So NOW whenever anyone tries to do anything, they have to think. Will this make them use an atomic bomb?

And suddenly, police are a lot more careful. Corporations switch their gosls from profit, to citizen utopia. Can't make anyone mad ever.

And in a strange way, I find that to be far more peaceful. Nobody is an asshole or a bully anymore, because we'll ALL be blown up if one person snaps.

Maybe others are afraid of MAD. I was born into it. Raised in an environment where they say the russians could bomb us at anytime, and almost did multiple times.

I was raised to have nuclear bomb drills where they sound a siren, and thousznds of kids rushed into underground bunkers. We had fire drills, and tornado drills, and atomic bomb drills.

I imagine the kids who are like 20 today, are almost immune to fear of public shootings, because they grew up in the school shooting drill days. These kids could walk into a warzone, and dodge bullets like NEO. But nobody would even shoot a gun if anyone anywhere could nuke you.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 11 hours ago

This idea is either the best ever or the worst ever... Either humanity is saved or we are annihilated 2 seconds after giving every individual nukes.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

There was a short story where everyone got one legal murder

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Can I make one of mine a sidecar for a motorcycle? Even if I have Poor Impulse Control?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You know there's literally death cultists out there trying to bring on the end of the world, right? We'd probably make it 6 hours

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago

You're optimistic.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

looks around at a world run by pedophiles, fascists, and abusers

......yeah, but is that really the worst idea?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 9 hours ago

It might be a terrible world, but it's the only one we have

If you want to leave, don't take out other people with you. I don't think you properly thought out the implications of your words, so I'll leave it at that

[–] EtnaAtsume@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is fucking insane and a terrible idea.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

nukes EtnaAtsume

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

What would you do about those with mental illness, Intellectual Disabilities, zealots, and children? In other words, people who may not have the capacity, or in the case of zealots, to make rational decisions.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I bet mental health services will be well-funded.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Certainly, and I'm in support of all the things that would need to happen to prevent the world from exploding. I just wish it happened without the stress and threat of bombs.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's very sad that some people need the threat of immediate personal physical violence to keep them from being controlling Nazi shitheads.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I'll second that.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

My children are fairly well behaved, and I would be nuked on day 1.