I don't see how that's controversial. I often do this when I see bands I like play live, to protect my ears.
They had a huge influence. I'm not a Beatles fan yet I can see this.
They arguably created the first hard rock song ever.
They were pionneers of progressive rock.
They were precursors of doom metal.
And I'm probably forgetting some and surely don't know all of the influence they had.
And they undoubtly had great variety in their songs and experimented a lot.
I like your enthusiasm. Can't say I'm looking forward to figure out that part, but I'll try. Thanks
I went and saved the queen from that war that happened long ago. Then it appeared I had nothing left to do. I stopped there.
It helps feeling better about stealing.
How is "86 the cherries" quicker than saying "no cherries"? Sounds like 4 times as long.
For context, I never worked in a restaurant and I just learned that jargon now.
Wouldn't that generate images of children with small-sized adult bodies?
If it doesn't know what a child's body looks like, it can't just figure it out.
I understand if you do, but I hope you won't. I like this place despite its flaws and I hope it won't turn into a far right community.
I don't understand how you can do this to your own daughter.
If anything, a father should be supporting his daughter through divorce.
This is a common question in economics.
It's called technological unemploymemt and it's a type of structural unemployment.
Economists generally believe that this is temporary. Workers will take new jobs that are now available or learn new skills to do so.
An example is how most of the population were farmers, before the agricultural revolution ans the industrial revolution. Efficiency improvements to agriculture happened, and now there's like only about 1% of the population in agriculture. Yet, most people are not unemployed.
There was also a time in England when a large part of the population were coal miners. Same story.
Each economic and technological improvement expands the economy, which creates new jobs.
There's been an argument by some, Ray Kurzweil if I remember correctly, but others as well, that we will eventually reach a point where humans are obsolete. There was a time when we used horses as the main mode of land transportation. Now, this is very marginal, and we use horses for a few other things, but really there's not that much use for them. Not as much as before. The same might happen to humans. Machines might become better than humans, for everything.
Another problem that might be happening is that the rate of technological change might be too fast for society to adapt, leaving us with an ever larger structural unemployment.
One of the solution that has been suggested is providing a basic income to everyone, so that losing your job isn't as much of a big problem, and would leave you time to find another job or learn a new skill to do so.
Didn't even think about this. I thought of how crushingly boring and annoying it must have been to have been unable to move at all. For 6 months.
And now I realize it must have been dreadful, at first.
Now I know what my pseudonym will be if I'm in a black metal band.