this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
269 points (99.6% liked)

PC Gaming

14019 readers
1056 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

https://collapseos.org/ suddenly starting to look a little less batshit

[–] Xorg_Broke_Again@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Hopefully, as a side effect of the current situation, software developers will be a bit more mindful of ram consumption. The "just buy more RAM bro" argument isn't really working nowadays. 

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Routhinator@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Just download more bro.

[–] webp@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

Mmmm chocolate bars

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 11 hours ago

Fortunately you can save money by not buying HP PCs.

If run prices get out of hand don't buy more RAM don't upgrade your computer don't give them your money and then when the bubble pops continue not to give them your money. All these manufacturers need to fail

[–] Damage@feddit.it 27 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

PC manufacturers should grow some balls and tell RAM suppliers to lower the price or lose their business forever.

good luck negotiating with the AI cartel

[–] TacoSocks@infosec.pub 23 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

The RAM suppliers would probably be thrilled to end those consumer contracts, they could allocate more to high paying AI.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 12 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

There's no guarantee that AI companies will need this amount of product indefinitely, while PC manufactures will always need RAM. Alienating them would be commercially foolish.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's exactly why they can alienate them. The PC manufacturers don't really have many vendors to choose from.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago

For now. Would you risk a long-standing relationship with your most important customers for a temporary boost in income?

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Foolish in the long term, but quite effective in the short term.

I don't disagree, but it seems their priorities are not on long term stability.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 8 hours ago

They do this because everyone else allows them to. I think computer and device manufacturers have more leverage than RAM manufacturers if they join together. Yet they don't, because today's management class is vastly incompetent.

[–] pepperonisalami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Agreed, which is stupid to put everything to AI but no consumer to use the goddamned AI 😮‍💨

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My base starting point parts list (full build with 9800x3d, 64GB/4TB, 9700xt) was 2000usd about five months ago when it was last used to base a build on.

It's currently 'down' to about 3400 after peaking last week at over 3500. The excess is nearly entirely from RAM and SSD prices.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 40 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Holy fuck. That is insane. It used to be something like 5-10% max.

[–] qupada@fedia.io 23 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

35% is the kind of numbers I used to have on servers at work, which often feature >2TB of RAM.

(another similar percentage being the CPUs, 128 cores per socket doesn't come cheap)

Seeing those numbers for desktop hardware, "holy fuck" is about right.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago

Yeah. Scientific and high performance compute are really eating it on ram prices right now.

And using less memory is much harder than just opening fewer browser tabs.

Software is designed to eat memory for it was very cheap in the past. Well, comparatively.

For data center shit, it’s probably up in the 70-80% range (unless you’re also running shitloads of H100s or A100s or whatever top of the line is these days)

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And it's never going away because the technology for RAM by subscription is right around the corner.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 20 hours ago

VDI has been a thing for over a decade now.