this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
67 points (94.7% liked)

World News

54020 readers
2789 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. officials are threatening major changes to a trade agreement with Mexico and Canada that could upend the way business is done and leave Canada on the outs.

The Trump administration has a list of things it wants Mr. Carney to concede, including longstanding grievances about protected industries in Canada, such as the dairy sector. Another pressing issue for the U.S. administration is the fact that liquor distributors controlled by Ontario and other provincial governments in Canada pulled U.S. liquor off their shelves last year, in retaliation against Mr. Trump’s tariffs on Canada.

Trump administration officials have also been irked by Mr. Carney’s global charm offensive as he seeks to bolster Canada’s trade relationships with other countries, including China. Responding to a modest tariff deal that Mr. Carney struck during a visit to Beijing last month, Mr. Trump threatened to impose 100 percent tariffs on Canadian goods, and claimed that China would “take over” Canada and even ban hockey.

. . .

Mr. Trump and his advisers have indicated that the three-country pact could be scrapped altogether. Instead, the United States could end up with bilateral deals with Canada and Mexico, the advisers have suggested. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

MBFC
Archive

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

How about Canada And Mexico sign agreements with Europe, Latin America, and the TPP and see how the US manages without being able to exploit anyone?

Canadians don't need the US, they have literally 10x the natural resources per capita. The US is not negotiating from a position of power.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Carney is working on exactly this- a 40 country trade block with 1.5 billion people and 40% of world GDP.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Canada is down in Mexico now expanding trade with a huge trade mission.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

All the more reason for Canada to join the EU then

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nobody up here is taking these threats seriously anymore. Manufacturing in the US would immediately crater. So many Americans would lose jobs, and thanks to their bullying isolationism nobody is lining up to replace Canada as a viable trading partner.

Having no free trade with the US would suck but it’s temporary. Being a vassal state or getting annexed is permanent.

Maintain current elbow position.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

So in other words it would be an amazing distraction from Epstein for another two weeks, minimum. Got it. I’m sure this is fine

[–] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

My sister was a drummer in a 3 piece band with a guitarist and a vocalist (Sparse I knoow). The vocalist ended up kicking the drummer and guitarist out of the band and refused to admit that it means she left the band.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Canadians on the whole aren't worried about this. But remember fellow Canadians, it can still hurt. We need to be prepared to make sacrifices individually.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

I think we're all clear on the assignment. We've all taken a hit for the sake of "Buy Canadian" and other movements, to help with re-alignment, and we all know we're going to have to support each other as shocks continue to hit. An important factor, however, is the pain needs to be distributed in a reasonable way. The TSE index funds are seeing solid and gaining dividends. We need to see some more movement from the top income brackets in putting those dividends back in to domestic industry to help compensate for inevitable job losses.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

A North American trade pact without Canada?

So ... basically just a trade deal with Mexico, eh? Have fun with that.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Leave out Mexico, too. It’ll be painless.

[–] DrivebyHaiku@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Been listening in on the finance bro economy speak podcasts over the last while and what Americans don't seem to grasp is that this isn't going to go away when they kick Trump out of office. This is permanent damage done.

Canadians will happily take the hit while the government sets up new trade partnerships because we spent the last year doing it. There are now crops coming from local farms that didn't exist two years ago because we were importing before then but the threats and market pressure placed national food security at the top of the priority list. Canadians as a people will made everyday sacrifices to do the thing and start winning back our independence from reliance on American trade. As an ally America has proven it is too volitille to trust even if they elect someone less crazy there's no assurance that the system will honor it's commitments anymore.

It will take a little while before the American economy looks like it is properly done for. Those small businesses are already disappearing along with the manufacturing jobs because raw materials that are tarriffed now will eventually just divert to other markets permanently. People are no longer going to the US for tourism the way they once did and once the tourism infrastructure of kitschy little customer service venues that depends on those dollars is lost those locations are going to start losing some of their charm as destinations. Once these private businesses burn through their credit and are forced to close shop your landscape is going to look very barren. I implore Americans to keep up the fight against this admin and at least try to stem the soft power and economic hemorrhage before it gets worse.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh we understand all too well. The damage from the current administration will take years to recover, decades, generations. Some of it never will

For me the anti-intellectual oppression is worse. That brain drain is something we’ll never recover from

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Lmao so just… a trade pact with ourselves?

Honestly, I couldn’t come up with dumber ideas if I tried

Edit: I guess the intent would be us and Mexico somehow puppeted/manipulated or whatever. But tbh I think that says more about some latent thoughts he might have about getting some Lebensraum in Mexico.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mexico should tell the orange pedo rapist to kiss their ass (but in Spanish). Canada and Mexico should do trade deals.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago
[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago

Hahahahahah 🤡

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Oh no, a country with ceding world power is making an empty threat. D E S P E R A T E

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

There's nothing new about that idea whatsoever.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

it’s just a weak attempt at the prisoners dilemma but to give up concessions for trade.

It’s not going to happen.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ban hockey? Wow, that's harsh. Casus belli. I'm not even sure if Canadians would be sorry after genociding Americans for the hockey ban.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He was claiming that China would somehow ban hockey in Canada

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

That's quite a claim. Rather covfefeish claim.

[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Goodbye Felicia

[–] nomecks@lemmy.wtf -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, Carney is so popular right now that Conservatives keep crossing the aisle, but he'll definitely cave to the US when nearly every Canadian approves of cutting off the US

[–] excursion22@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure it's Carney's popularity any more than PP's derangement.