this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
282 points (99.3% liked)

196

5767 readers
1478 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's cut the bullshit

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago

Why would you even ask why one wants a promotion; the usual question is obviously why they deserve it (and tacitly, what happens if they say no). And your answer, thus, is a documented trail of how everything goes to shit without you.

But business people and especially HR are idiots, so y'know I'm sure the meme checks out.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The people who only want more money are precisely the people you don’t want running the show. They will be the first to cut corners, self promote and generally make the workplace a toxic environment.

Money motivated is important, sure, but you also want to find someone who likes solving problems, is a leader and a strategist, is invested in unlocking talent in others that they may not have known they had, has the communication skills to talk both up and down the ladder, and who has enough knowledge in the business to be effective. People like that tend to also take pride and enjoy their work, and often that shines through.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

If all salaries gave you decent living standards, then money wouldn't be too big an issue.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Sure, but I don't want the promotion because I'm some wonderful leader and strategist, I want the promotion so I can have more money because being alive is expensive

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

For the record, I do all those things. But I just hate all the bullshit surrounding it. If they didn’t pay me, I wouldn’t show up.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

The positions one can be "promoted" to generally aren't the kind where you have control over your own pay, outside of bonuses.

[–] osanna@thebrainbin.org 14 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Have you ever sat down and thought what money actually is? It's nothing. It used to be that we would barter with 8 apples for a watermelon or what have you. but now it's just data on a bunch of hard drives. It's nothing.

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've heard the bartering idea isn't historically accurate, and that instead people just gave others in the communities things and just vaguely tracked the sense of "you owe me one".

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I recommend reading/listening to the book "Debt: The First 5000 Years" by David Graeber. It is a great book and talks about much more than just the myth of barter. The tl;dr is barter only happens between "strangers that you cant/wont enter into trade relationship with" or enemies. There is much more nuance in the book and many examples of indigenous peoples and their practices around debt (obviously) and barter.

[–] TeryVeneno@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I need to get this book, reading this Wikipedia page just made me feel like all the weird feelings I got in economics and anthropology class were justified. The everyday communism is so real, and I wish more people were aware of it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Half of most economics classes are propaganda. We need a corporate veil to encourage investment. We need our wages to shrink every year to encourage investment.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago

that's my understanding, too - that bartering was a rare thing only done between groups that didn't know or trust one another - mostly people just shared things in common (what Marx called "primitive communism" when he started reading the anthropological accounts).

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You're saying that like it's some new revelation, but anyone who's gone to high school should know that. It's also an incomplete statement.

Money doesn't have intrinsic value beyond its material, but it has extrinsic value given to it by the people and society that use it. Peanuts have no monetary value, but if you and your friends all agree to exchange it for goods and services between the members of the circle, peanuts suddenly gain monetary value.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Tbf a lot of people really don't absorb what they are supposed to learn in highschool, or go to shitty schools/have shitty teachers, especially in the US.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now you barter 8 apples for money and then later money for a watermelon. What's the difference? Money in itself isnt the problem

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The difference is that banks can just create money out of nothing. You're farming more apples than ever but still getting one watermelon.

[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Be that as it may, it’s still required to have a home and food. I don’t like it any more than you do. Money isn’t the key to happiness, but the lack of money sure causes unhappiness.

[–] osanna@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 week ago

Absolutely, but I still think it'd be better if we were akin to star trek. Working to better ourselves, rather than making another trillion $

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 1 week ago

It's a store of value. Simple as that.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

That’s would fall under “career growth”