this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
271 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

81162 readers
4596 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] silverneedle@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Spotify's functions have not changed a bit since 2016. It is literally the same application, what has changed are the tiny things they're doing for compatibility but that is not really worth mentioning. Intentionally leaving UX out.

Honestly what code is there to write for this glorified web browser? They're probably also outsourcing most of their data collection and recommendation algorithms.

Buy physical media, rip CDs, share shit and that's it

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 2 points 26 minutes ago

You are wrong on many points IMO.
I've been using it for nearly a decade, it's changed a lot.
I don't know why you'd be leaving ux out.
What code is there to write? You must be trolling come on now.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.zip 2 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

Like a lot of these big, consolidated, years long projects, the real work is maintenance. The rest is just a bunch of people desperately trying to improve obscure KPIs by 1%.

Mark Fisher's idea of market stalinism comes to mind

[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Good thing Anna's Archive exists and just keeps getting better.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Is that supposed to be impressive? Spotify is among the dumbest, shittiest apps. It's literally just a music library player.

Spotify doesn't exist because it's some genius app. It exists because of legal control. They have no reason to make the app better. Indeed their shitty capitalist motives continue to enshittify the app.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent-seeking

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago

Notifications don't even work for most of my saved podcasts.

[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

So glad I dropped Spotify and moved to Deezer.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Reads as: we here at Spotify are a bunch of naive and gullible halfwits who have diluted themselves into being proud of it.

thumbs up the suspenders, belly proudly hanging over the belt and gently rolling the feet from heel to toe

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] banshee@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Why would anyone think this is a good thing? You're actively telling the world that your product is likely full of bugs and hard to maintain.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Or even to true believers, they can just vibe code up just as good of an app.

It basically declares point blank that the technology does not matter, it's their marketing and music rights only that matter.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

My first thought for the title is thinking it's because they fired their best/most expensive developer and kept the AI baby sitters.

[–] atfergs@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This sounds like such a fucking nightmare. I got into software because I like writing code. Their job is now the equivalent of a full time PR reviewer.

[–] BaroqueW@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

PR reviewer but the dev was drunk, sometimes is a genius, sometimes is eating sand, doesn't follow guidelines, likes to duplicate code, and forgets what was in the original task description after a while.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago (3 children)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Look at the feature list bragged about. It's really simple stuff. I can absolutely believe they vibe coded that stuff.

The "hardest" one was to feed listener history to an LLM and have it generate a playlist based on the titles. That's such an absurdly trivial thing to do.

It's not rocket science. It's a trivial streaming music player.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

This is spotify. It's just a music player. The overwhelming bulk of the code was probably written like 20 years ago by a 15 year old.

[–] Skymt@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

It's quite possible they already fired their best developers

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Do you know what they call someone that doesn't write a single line of code?

Anything other than a "developer".

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 6 points 3 hours ago

A manager. This tool is for what managers think software development is: managing the production of code. From that perspective this hype makes a lot of sense, just turn all your current developers into managers with AI and you now have grown the team by 10x. You can go back in time and find many jokes about how adding more developers doesn't speed up delivery but slows it down. I don't see how AI would suddenly make that less true, especially since the AI is not accountable for its results, you are.

Lmao, exactly. If you're not writing the code you're not the developer, the AI is the developer. Youre just another asshole who gets paid to do nothing.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 10 points 6 hours ago

Never used it.

Started self-hosting Navidrome.

Never gonna use it.

[–] bless@lemmy.ml 45 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That explains how Anna's Archives got in

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I was so excited to get my grubby hands on that music only to later learn it was hundreds of terabytes...

[–] murmelade@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

You were expecting to be able to burn out all the music in the world (yes, hyperbolic, shut up) on a couple DVDs?

Its also not sorted in any way that's usable.

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How is that still a reason to brag about

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Fewer lines of code -> fewer programmers -> smaller salaries -> higher stock value

[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't worked in the industry before, but I have always assumed the "best developer" reviews code and architects the project, thus they write a minimal amount of code pre-AI anyway...

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

It’s a mixed bag.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 22 points 10 hours ago

From The Software Quality and Productivity Crisis Executives Won’t Address (via on Lemmy)

Executives aren’t ignorant. They have the data. They commission the surveys. They attend the conferences where CTOs present their concerns. They know that:

  • 91% of CTOs cite technical debt as the biggest challenge
  • 75% of projects are expected to fail
  • 69% of developers lose significant time to inefficiencies
  • Only 39% of projects meet success criteria
  • The recommended 15–20% investment in technical debt management yields better long-term returns than crisis spending

Yet they choose:

  • Not to allocate recommended budgets for technical debt management
  • Not to make quality a strategic priority despite CTOs’ and developers’ concerns
  • Not to mention these challenges in public communications to shareholders
  • To celebrate AI productivity gains whilst developers report record inefficiency
  • To focus on the next hype cycle (AI) rather than address fundamental problems

This isn’t a failure of knowledge. It looks to me like a failure of courage and integrity. A failure of the very concept of leadership.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Spotify is a subscription radio station. I'm sure their development team is large and doing great secret, next-level things. /s

[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Glad i moved away from Spotify a year ago. Happy to ve using Qobuz and bandcamp

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Even if you don't subscribe to Qobizz their magazine helps me find new music all the time

https://www.qobuz.com/us-en/magazine

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 hours ago

Explains a lot

[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 5 points 9 hours ago

I bet they have developers not write, but I guarantee you that those are not their best devs...

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 hours ago

Yeah they're gonna need to save all the money they can because everyone I know is cancelling their subs to basically every service, from Amazon to Spotify to Crunchyroll to Netflix.

These fucking companies think they can do whatever they want and we'll just roll over and take it and continue to give them cash every month.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Spotify lies as naturally as it squeezes musicians.

load more comments
view more: next ›