this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
449 points (96.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

14896 readers
967 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

it's easy to date a car guy - if he likes Lamborghini Countach he probably grew up in the 80s. If he like Dodge Charger, he probably dreamed of one in the 70s, and so on...

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Same, but I'm also a straight male so that might be a confounding factor.

[–] ALilOff@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is great from Amtrak, but wish they were more affordable.

Last I checked for me a ticket on the Amtrak was 4x the price of me for coach compared to a plane ticket .

[–] Gathorall@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The issue is that the plane ticket is artificially affordable, the worst public transit heavily subsidised by your tax dollar.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Fun fact: at least one of the mods of this community is a car guy.

One of the many great things about my "daily driver" being a bicycle is that all my cars can be project cars, instead of having to get rid of them to own something boring and reliable instead.


Frankly, I think the overlap between anti-car-dependency urbanists and car enthusiasts is a lot bigger than people give it credit for. It's the normie commuters who see cars as an appliance and can't imagine an alternative who are the problem.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

If I didn’t need to drive my car I would definitely be working on it a lot more

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That was always my dream if I lived more rurally. Imagine having a garage so big that you could work on several cars all the time!

As it turns out I found more interesting things to build and fix, so my peak “car guy” was like 17 and I never did anything more complex than replace brakes and springs

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, when I bought my house (in an urban neighborhood), I had a choice between a 3/2 with a basement or a 2/1 with a 1/1 detached 2-car carriage house. I went with the former because my wife liked it better and I figured I could knock a hole in the basement wall to park cars in it, but I haven't actually done that so I kinda regret not picking the latter. Having to work on my cars in the driveway really cramps my style.

[–] JordanZ@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

First apartment: 1200sq/ft.

Current garage: 900sq/ft.

I’m getting there…

Spent the last couple weekends doing maintenance on a couple things out there cause it’s been abnormally warm.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Go to know that I'm not the only one. I don't see plane guys and submarine guys using those as their daily drivers. I do have to ask though: am I a hypocrite if I want walkable cities but also want to embrace van life? I would love to get my hands on an old Soviet UAZ-452 and travel around Lake Superior and Lake Tahoe in it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

am I a hypocrite if I want walkable cities but also want to embrace van life? I would love to get my hands on an old Soviet UAZ-452 and travel around Lake Superior and Lake Tahoe in it.

Have you considered a sailboat instead? More space, less fuel.

[–] Parasail2109@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

Same, but I don't have room/money for it so I just watch motorsports.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would it be alright still if we just wheeled a guillotine in front of your house anyway? It would be purely a symbolic gesture, but I'm sure people will bring beer and will want a quick tour of your cars, and uh yeah we'll see how far the party goes

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No, thank you. I don't really care for beer.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

Well, can I sit in one of your cars and make "nyeeooooooww" noises followed by "eu-eu-eu-eu- POW -vrooooom". After that I will leave.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

We can skip straight to the hard stuff.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 64 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Eh, car guys are often easier to persuade that public transport and walkability policies are useful.
They would prefer not to have to share the road with normies.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, car guys in my experience consistently think (maybe correctly) that everyone else on the road but them is a total moron. You don't like those pesky cyclists sharing the road with you? Neither do most of us cyclists; let's get them on separated paths. Don't like morons who can't drive? Make it so they don't have to. Don't like traffic? Take the other space-inefficient cars off the road.

I think car people recognize that just positively reinforcing micromobility and public transit can improve their experience.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Agreed. As a car guy, I genuinely hate how most roads are setup in the US. We could be doing so much better to keep drivers focused and safe, but they just copy-paste more giant grids into hellscapes because it doesn’t require any thought or creativity.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the advances they make like lane keeping and auto cruise control just make people even less aware of what they’re doing.

They’re not building cars to be driven anymore. They’re building them to sit in traffic.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I rarely use cruise control and the closest thing to traction control I have is a limited slip differential. All analog dials and a basic-ass double DIN radio that just functions as Bluetooth for the rare call.

I want my input to go straight to the wheels and I would rather die by my own hand than let a company’s negligence do it for me.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's actually another really good point: North American stroads have to be so fucking tedious for people who actually want to get something out of their cars. It's the same shit everywhere so there's nothing to see, you go just fast enough for your $100,000 car to be totaled if someone sneezes at you but not enough for it to be fun, you're constantly in danger thanks to the poor design, and it's you and a goddamn thousand people trying to get to Paunch Burger.

Imagine you had a high-end gaming PC and the only way to use it was to play cheap asset flips. I'm not saying we make roads into racetracks when the normies are gone; rather, I'm saying holy shit, the roads in well-designed urban places are so much more interesting and beautiful to drive in.

Whenever I see a really nice car stuck in traffic my heart breaks a little. It deserves better than creeping along because some idiot can’t zipper merge.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Total separation of pedestrians and cyclists from cars isn't feasible unless we're willing to close large parts of cities from vehicle traffic. Will people support this? I certainly do but in the USA this is widely regarded as an unrealistic solution.

I don’t think they’re all morons. Some are just not good at driving. I’m not good at a lot of things, but most of them aren’t forced on me as the only way to survive in society.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

As car guy, its true.

I also advocate for smalller vehicles.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One of my buddies is a car guy and he recently moved to a denser city and would bike to work pretty often. Driving is supposed to be a pleasure for car guys and most of them won't scratch that itch on a stroad or clogged highway.

[–] severalkittens@ani.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. I love biking so much but driving my Miata top down along the coast is also enjoyable

[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Wish i had a coast close by... No wait that would mean more salt. I stay in the Mountains or Woods.

Hello, I’m that car guy.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 41 points 1 day ago

car guys also want less cars on the road.

[–] SharkWeek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago

My brother is a car guy. He's also an ardent cyclist and is more environmentally conscious than the vast majority of westerners.

Sometimes people are more than just one thing, and if a car spends 99.9% of it's time in the garage in bits it's not a major factor in pollution or traffic problems.

[–] Takeshidude@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

To echo a few other comments, i would consider myself a car guy, but i badly want trains and public transit. I like cars and driving as a hobby, not as a requirement for daily life

[–] severalkittens@ani.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I consider myself a car guy, but I want to drive because I want to, not because it's the only option.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also a car guy. If there was decent public transport to work that got me there in a similar time to taking a car, I'd take the public transport.

I want my car to be for my enjoyment, as well as a tool to get to different places, but not as a tool that takes me to work

(using a car to get to work would still be fine if you worked in a more rural area with less public transport availability, but I also believe that pickup trucks shouldn't be daily vehicles and would be much more useful on a rent-when-needed system)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If I had to commute from a rural area I’d get a fun sports car and not a truck. That way I have a good excuse to miss work in bad weather, and more fun commuting in good weather.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Honestly, I'm with you on this! I love light little cars with little engines that barely consume fuel compared to what a lot of people are driving these days

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd rather ride with an organization that doesn't have Twitter Gold, but we take what we can get, I guess...

[–] n4ch1sm0@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Real talk, I remember when Amtrak was fraternizing with the Trump admin, and even considering putting ICE at their train stations. Not to mention the embarrassing launch of their new trains that were supposed to be faster, but wound up going about as well as Tesla's convention loop in Las Vegas. In other words, it did not go faster or revolutionize travel.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't necessarily blame Amtrak for a lot of their speed and timing issues. They're at the whims of the freight carriers in many sections of shared track.

Legally passenger trains have priority. But reality means loopholes. Like making the freight trains too long to fit onto side tracks, forcing the passenger trains there instead causing delays.

Wendover has a pretty good video about this and other aspects of 50 year old transportation laws.

The Trump stuff is a different beast, but even then with something that's heavily reliant on federal funding, not annoying the dictator in chief is more of a requirement to continue to exist at all.

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That should be easy to enforce with current laws. If you can’t pull onto the side tracks then you should be fined. But it needs public and political will.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] vocornflakes@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Begone,

inhale

Quasi-governmental agency run like a for-profit business with dubious expectation of revenue and profit with a business model that is deeply misunderstood by both its critics and proponents

Exhale.

[–] Themistocles@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s crazy how much it effects your psychology living in a walkable city. It really helps me feel so much more connected to my community

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

The monkey paw curls Wish granted.