this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
266 points (97.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

10790 readers
1795 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mech@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

85% of earth are still completely uninhabited by humans, simply because it's too inhospitable or not worthwhile to settle there.
So why would anyone want to settle on Mars?
Even if something apocalyptic happens on earth, like runaway global warming, the atmosphere and magnetosphere getting stripped away, or a new ice age – It would still be much more hospitable than Mars is.
When we ever get the tech to terraform Mars, guess what: Then we can use the same tech to fix Earth.
And when the sun explodes, Mars won't save us either.

There is no reasonable justification for putting humans on Mars.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

It is all academic anyway, we are no where near being able to colonize mars, we are no where near "terraforming" it. No where near establishing the basics of life on an outpost. We would be hard pressed to land some dudes in one piece. We would be unable to land other equipment in the same place reliably. We wouldn't be able to guarentee a water supply, an air supply, which could be gotten from the water.

We could land a nuclear reactor with the astronauts I suppose which could help do all the energy intensive stuff they would need to do, like making air and water out of a frozen wasteland with an atmosphere that is almost non existent as the sun strips moliecules in the air to base elements with no magnetic shield to protect them as there is no liquid magma, it's a dead planet.

Also meaning the water isn't reliably near the surface. The hot mantle boils water and drives it back to the surface, water is actually not that much of a percent of earth, it's just all at the surface. Without that inner heat the water makes it's way further and further down in the cracks of the Mars, and Mars is cracked to hell to begin with, hit by so many craters, and such towering mountains and valleys, and is partially why it's already a dead planet to begin with. Regardless the water is not going to be reliably near the surface.

So we can find a bit of co2, from there maybe with a nuclear reactor we could make water, and oxygen. But it's not a very certain thing. And we don't want to put these confidence men/clown kings like Musk in a position where we are trusting their exploding rockets with carrying nuclear payloads into space. If it exploded in midair spreading fallout across the world they would clap and pretend it was a success and our leaders would agree with them and tell everyone it's safe while they decontaminate and upgrade their home and car and work filtration systems and don't go outside, and make laws mandating we don't minimize our time in the fall out zone just because this is 1984.

Long story short, it's a confidence game, we are generations away from the technology to even start in any real way, and we will fall apart long before then. As always musk is stroking off the imaginations of tech enthusiasts that trust the wrong (the worst we all trust the wrong people to different degrees,) people.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's mostly plasma actually.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

That just makes it more metal.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What? Who is Tyson responding to?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I think noone he just does that

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This person is appreciating a photo, and then he calls them a piece of shit for not appreciating said photo. He does this often? Is this a parody account, or the real scientist?

[–] UnrepentantAlgebra@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Neil "Smoke" deGrasse Tyson.

I don't think this is the astronomer talking, unless he forgot to log out of his personal account.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looks like shit. Earth blows this dead red rock out of the water, again. No competition.

Team Earth!

[–] Pattylay@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hell yeah! Earth stays Winning!

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 3 points 20 hours ago

Earth! Earth! Earth!

come one, everybody!

Earth! Earth! Earth! Earth! Earth! Earth!

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] udon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How large would the sun look to the human eye though? It's tiny on photos, usually appears much bigger

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

It would be about 30% smaller. Mars is at 1.5AU from the sun, so 1-1/1.5 ~30%

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

tl;dr:

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Very very likely not the first. We‘ve had rovers on mars for about three decades now and all of them had cameras. Mars days are only slightly longer than earth days so there have been over 10000 opportunities to just point a camera at the horizon and take a picture.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 2 days ago

The article I linked has similar photos from 2005 and 1978.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There’s only one Opportunity on Mars, and I miss that little guy.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Look, if you had one shot, one opportunity To seize everything you ever wanted?one moment Would you capture it or just let it slip?

[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've seen blue sunset pictures from Mars before, but I suspect someone pumped up the saturation on this picture.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course. But that's par for the course 🤷

[–] hector@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure there aren't any golf courses on Mars yet. Such a waste they are short enough of water.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

short enough of water.

Why not astroturf then! I read many comments by Martians recommending it.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Pfas that's why. Astroturf is lousy with pfas. Mars is slippery enough as is without adding more deathslip substance.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks that was interesting. Does mars wobble on it's axis? I know they have a summer and winter so they must I guess. In the winter they get what looks like ice build up around the pole not getting sun, but it's dry ice, co2, super cold -276 or something like that.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

There's a semi-permanent ice cap that's mostly water, but in the winters about a quarter of the atmosphere condenses down into dry ice. The axial tilt is very similar to Earth, but the seasons last significantly longer, and the orbit around the Sun is more elliptical.

[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is a piece of shit.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While true, what does that have to do with this post?

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just woke up from a long nap and I just saw Elon wasn’t mentioned.

Guess I was tired?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Tired of hearing Elon mentioned, am I right?

👉🏻😎👉🏻

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz -2 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Grok is this true? Why is the sunset on mars blue?

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shun llm's. They aren't your friend.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 23 hours ago

This isnt X, there is no grok here its just a meme

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everybody ask sem from now on

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would guess it's essentially the same effect that causes our blue sky in the day and red sky at dawn and dusk. TL;DR if you already know what Rayleigh scattering is, skip to the last paragraph

Okay so the reason that we can "see" the sky, as in it is lit up and has colour, is that sunlight (which is basically white) gets scattered when it passes through the atmosphere instead of just going straight through. This is an effect called Rayleigh scattering. Rayleigh scattering affects shorter wavelengths more than longer ones.

If there is too much scattering of a wavelength, chances are that most of it will not make it to a given observer. It'll either just wind up going off into space or being absorbed by something. During daytime, our atmosphere does this just enough to get rid of most of the ultraviolet light. The next frequency down is blue, which gets scattered enough for us to see it.

For the sky directly above you to appear blue to you, you need some of the blue wavelengths of light to have made it to that point above you and then get scattered there. Other wavelengths need to have either been absorbed already (like UV) or not scattered much yet (like red).

During sunsets and sunrises, the light has to pass through much more atmosphere to get to us than it does during the day. As a result, the blue light starts to meet the same fate that UV does during the day, and longer wavelengths like yellow and red are the only ones that make it to us

So, all that is to set up that Mars has a way thinner atmosphere which does way less scattering. The sky normally looks more or less the same colour as the ground because there's so little Rayleigh scattering happening that dust kicked up by the wind dominates the colour instead. However, same rules apply as on Earth - sunset means more scattering. It's just that on Mars, that goes from UV scattering to blue, instead of blue to red.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

Thats a great explanation. Science is dope

Wow. Huh, that's really helpful. Thanks, friend.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Edging for a long time...

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Dust in atmosphere multiplies the effect of Rayleigh scattering