It is a mystery, I guess we'll never know.
And don't forget, THE FED isn't a banking cartel! These bankers serving terms on the board are filled with love and affection for us, their little proles. THANK YOU FED THANK YOOOOUUU
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
347 points (98.1% liked)
A Boring Dystopia
15457 readers
381 users here now
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
out of touch idiots
How incredibly privileged to not even be able to conceptualize that phrase.
Well I mean when you say 8 in 10 are living paycheck to paycheck that got my ears up, sounds like BS to me, Americans are the heaviest spending nation on earth but you'd think they'd do a little better than 80% of them being 1 missed payday away from being broke
In contrast, the Federal Reserve found that 54% of Americans have emergency savings to cover three months of expenses. Bankrate found that while 59% of Americans are uncomfortable with their level of emergency savings, 34% are living paycheck to paycheck.
Also, supposedly 41% of people earning 300-500k/yr are "paycheck to paycheck."
I couldnt find it just now, but there was a profile I read on one such person a while back. Of course, after paying private school tuition for 3 kids, monthly payments on their two Mercedes, and maxing out two 401ks, two iras, and hsa...they didn't have much money left over every month.
So I'm willing to believe that the OOP was more about this than about actual hand-to-mouth situations
Yeah, paycheck to paycheck doesn't mean you are scrapping to get by, it means your monthly income is about the same as your monthly expenses.
That means it's not about your income or wealth, just cash in vs cash out. Why this can be misleading is that if you make $300k and are month to month, that means selling assets or filling chapter 11 bankruptcy could fix your finance problems. However, someone with a small income is probably already doing all they can do to survive. Both fit the definition, but their situations are vastly different.
Well when mommy government and daddy business get together to fuck you.
they both be daddies.
"A paycheck? Those things my tenants use to pay me?"
Makes on wonder which of the words he does not understand: "Living" or "Paycheck".
It was actually the word "to".
It means you work or die.
Well, actually, lots of working and dying anyway. Cause any emergency you're fucked
It is a valid question.
How exactly do we quantify this concept because if its self reporting, I guarantee it includes people who have larger incomes claiming they are living pay check to pay check. These people should not be lumped with those who are struggling to afford a basic quality of life.
Paycheck to paycheck can be a pretty broad term. I worked at the bottom rung in healthcare scraping by and had to endure listening to people making 3x what I made talking about when their check was gonna hit the bank. It's easy to be broke when you have a spending problem
seriously. I had a client who brought in six figures per month after expenses. He still barely scraped by because he (1) was in major debt which he never paid down, only refinanced, (2) kept renovating his house unnecessarily (3) refused to stop taking vacations to Liberia (4) for some reason his wife is credibly accused of war crimes which occurred after they got married.
i was a college student and i had better credit, but he had access to more liquid funds. it was weird. if he missed a week of work, he'd be fine. if he missed two, he could not handle the pileup of bills. i could take a couple months off work and be fine. like i said, weird.
my old boss found some criminally interesting clients.
I had a boss years ago who owned a temp agency. When he bought the business it was giving him $40,000 per month in profits but this had dropped to $25,000 per month -- probably because he spent his day playing solitaire on his computer and listening to Rush LImbaugh instead of, you know, actually doing anything to benefit the business. I had the pleasure once of watching him berate his two receptionists (who made $7.25 an hour and had nothing whatsoever to do with the success of the business) for this drop in his income. He was friends with a bunch of west coast venture capitalists who were each worth hundreds of millions of dollars and his "poverty" absolutely burned him to his core.
Guy was pissed he wasn't as good at exploiting people as his VC friends. What a joke of a person.
Americans are famous for living beyond their means. Obviously there are a lot of genuinely poor people. But there are also many that just aren't financially responsible.
That really should be what's taught in schools instead of trying to teach them to pass some tests to get the schools money
I think, if your savings can't cover your basic needs for a month, you're in it. If you miss one paycheck, your life basically falls apart. It also means, if you have a sudden cost (car repair, water pipe burst, or illness in the USA) that is more than a monthly paycheck (which in turn is more than your savings), you're done.
While people like to dramatize their own Situation, wouldnt it be pretty easy to define it AS people who have as much spending as they have income without being able to save [amount].
If we want to exclude people who just dont save their money: people who have as much fixed spending as they have income
It means youve won, cunt.
It’s just a banana Michael
It means the people governing have never been a human being...