damn, they got bullied into changing it to 68 already. lmao
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)
news
24577 readers
543 users here now
Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:
-
To learn about and discuss meaningful news, analysis and perspectives from around the world, with a focus on news outside the Anglosphere and beyond what is normally seen in corporate media (e.g. anti-imperialist, anti-Zionist, Marxist, Indigenous, LGBTQ, people of colour).
-
To encourage community members to contribute commentary and for others to thoughtfully engage with this material.
-
To support healthy and good faith discussion as comrades, sharpening our analytical skills and helping one another better understand geopolitics.
We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.
Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:
The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.
-
Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.
-
Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.
-
Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.
-
Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.
-
Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.
-
Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.
-
American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.
-
Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.
-
AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Holy shit, all of the posts are cringe. idk what I was expecting, but surely something better than ..... this
Too little, too late.
To quote the memes of yore "silence brand"
It's not a joke. Kamala launched her campaign to become the 67th president in the year 2104.
Critical support to Kamala for helping to kill this dogshit meme once and for all.
beating a dead horse, really. I don't think it was popular anymore, it started during the summer, it's way into the school year.
"we're going to do memes to engage with The Youth™!" declares people who are notorious for killing memes stone dead simply by using them
If she manages to kill 67 now that she’s making it, that might be the only rare W she has
It wouldn't even be bad if they were memeing for the meme, even partially.
The reason it kills a meme stone dead is because it's memeing specifically to manipulate and do "hello fellow kids". Everyone feels that and immediately gets turned off. The complete and total lack of authenticity is what makes everyone recoil.
Yeah this is her version of "Pokemon Go to the polls" but she isn't even bothering to do anything with it, just 67
i don't think it's possible for a democrat politician to be authentic, they are the slimiest, greasiest, used-car-dealer, plastic smile, dead-behind-the-eyes dogs of capital i've had the misfortune to be aware of
It's a bad meme, so this is the one time they've ever done anything good for the world
I'll post the coconut joke again, that's a good trick! 
Rly gunning for that 9-15 y/o voting demographic
Youthlib Harris????? 
Even college students did 6-7, I've seen it. It might've started with Gen Alpha, but it spread to Gen Z, who are as old as like 30 now.
But the real issue is that it's too little, too late. They could've pulled 6-7 off if it was earlier, and perhaps if they made the 6-7 reference actually make sense.
The messaging is so bizarre.
It's signalling to the base but it's also trying to be edgy and hip but it's also (badly) targeting a demographic too young to vote and it's not targeting the actual younger voting demographic in a way that's gonna resonate with them. Most of it requires a lot of intertextual political knowledge and insider baseball to make sense of the messaging in the attempts at memes.
It feels like all of it is a 40 year old political consultant's idea of what an undecided 20 year old needs to hear about Kamala through a shoddy attempt at meme formats:
"Who do you trust on abortion?"
"Vance and Trump."
"Women."
omg le epic ownage 😏
The messaging is so muddy.
Kamala wasn't ever strong on her campaign with regards to abortion rights since she was chasing the GOP as they ran further to the right so it's not like she's known for being the staunch pro-choice candidate. So who "women" refers to feels so vague and, unless you're immediately thinking of Kamala Harris at every moment (i.e. avid K-holers who are gonna vote for her no matter what), then undecided people who are political disengaged and swing voters aren't gonna stare at that "meme" and connect the notion of trusting women to the notion of trusting Kamala to the notion that it's promising that Kamala will defend women's right to healthcare.
It's also really weak willed since it's Walz, a man, saying to trust women. So within the "diegetic" of the so-called meme, there's one woman and she's a journalist asking the question so it feels like she doesn't really know? It's just not a good tweet at all.
Even the bio is smug and posturing - "Elon wouldn't let us have @headquarters". That comes off as really entitled. It's not like headquarters is something that feels like KamalaHQ has a justifiable right to. It's just a vague term. Undecided people aren't gonna look at that and think "Gee, Elon is mean and Kamala is the victim here" they're gonna think "Why would you have a right to that Twitter handle just because you decided that your campaign name was going to be called Headquarters and why would anyone be okay with you getting to steal @Headquarters from someone else?" Idk maybe I'm too clouded by my own perspective but I just don't see a focus group really connecting with the idea that Elon Musk has snubbed the campaign or that there's injustice at play here, it just feels like entitlement.
my 5+6 yr old niblings are very excited about 6 7. say what you will but she really has her pulse on the electorate here
some 15 year-olds will be able to 
in 2028
:old-pedo-professor:
her iconic giggle
that's one way of putting it, i guess
"Zamala HarriZ" 
8 years ago doge was cringe. Today it's an actual department of the government that's denying you healthcare. And who says we don't have progress?
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Imagine being forced to write a puff piece about the cringiest thing of 2026 so far
Please no
What do they mean by 'social media brand' exactly(cbf to watch the video), are we getting LibSocial?
It appears to be an unholy mixture of BuzzFeed, Pod Save America, and skibidi toilet
Probably some grift to launch a website and yada yada
I found a YouTube link in your post. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: