this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
561 points (99.0% liked)

politics

27600 readers
3223 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Bernie Sanders also demanded “fundamental reforms” to Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, saying they are “terrorizing” US communities.

US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Wednesday demanded the removal of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller—a key architect of Donald Trump’s violent mass deportation campaign—as well as concrete reforms in exchange for any new funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

In remarks on the Senate floor, Sanders (I-Vt.) called ICE a “domestic military force” that is “terrorizing” communities across the country. The senator pointed specifically to the agency’s ongoing activities in Minnesota and Maine, where officers have committed horrific—and deadly—abuses.

Sanders said that “not another penny should be given” to ICE or Customs and Border Protection (CBP) “unless there are fundamental reforms in how those agencies function—and until there is new leadership at the Department of Homeland Security and among those who run our immigration policy.” The senator has proposed repealing a $75 billion ICE funding boost that the GOP approved last summer, an end to warrantless arrests, the unmasking of ICE and CBP agents, and more.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

How about dining every member of literally every penny they can access, and also not another dollar for them, ever?

We need a complete list of everyone who's ever worked for them and blacklist them from every business. Shot down ICE, starve them of every penny they have, blacklist them from every business, every job opportunity, and every charity or welfare. Y'all can literally just rot in the street, we'll clean you up later. Byyyye

Of and take away legal recourse too.

Don't necessarily incentive just brutalizing them, because the goal is their suffering, not just execution. Don't shorten the fun.

Make content out of their attempts to secure food and housing.

Sympathizers can suffer a sliding scale version of the punishment.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

While it is cathartic to think taking these people out of their position is punishing them, the reality is they will be replaced with another Nazi.

If Trump had been assassinated it would not have stopped this. If Hitler had been assassinated the Nazi would have fought on. This situation is no different.

It is a sobering and necessary realization that this whole administration isn't a one-off. This is a part of who we are.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then punish the behavior and train it out.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I am open to any suggestions and ideas. There is probably a path forward that no one has thought of.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 14 hours ago

God, what an asshole. They drove Sanders to the right too?

How 'bout not another penny for ICE, because we need to ABOLISH ICE.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

The moderate wing of fascism in action.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

I really hope he lives to be 103.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

God fucking damn it it's always the same shit.

Republicans push some absolute bullshit to 10.

Democrats: We need to be reasonable and go back to 6!


Where is the party that says we need to go back to zero bullshit!

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Been saying it for a long time now, we gotta primary every last DNC member holding a seat. They're all either complicit or neutered the point of uselessness.

I love Bernie but this obviously isn't his fight. He's been about economics for like, 400 years, and just economics and it's fine, but he's not going to lead us out of fascism. He needs to go rest and enjoy retirement.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

it would be like draining a swamp, so to speak /s

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

only way thats happening is if guns come out

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Or, we finally use our most powerful means of non-violent offense: a proper, long-term, Nation Wide General Strike.

The country would be brought to its knees if suddenly deprived of profit and labor, allowing us to simply ignore the democrats and their lack of spine, and instead demand real changes (abolishing ICE should be towards the top of the list).

That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would've had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.

There are some concrete steps all of us can take toward enacting that hard-core general strike to make it more viable and bearable for us all. (the titles below expand if you click them).

Learn First Aid! ⛑️

As we're seeing, deadly violence is being used against us and it will only continue. It extremely important to have the skills to be able to keep yourself and others alive if they get hurt.

Tacticool Girlfriend provides a great introduction to building a personal first aid kit, called an IFAK, which can deal with things like bullet wounds and other serious bleeding wounds. I also want to emphasize her recommendation of only buying medical gear from reputable sources (not Amazon!), such as North American Rescue to avoid fakes that could cost you your life.

But you'll need to learn how to use that equipment, too. The best resource for that is to take a local Stop The Bleed class, which are pretty widely available in most places. They may cost a small fee, but can also sometimes be free. Alternatively, if you cannot access a local class, this video by PrepMedic will give you a solid understanding of how to use Tourniquets and Gauze for wound packing.

Injuries are less harmful if they are tended to early. Learning first aid can help conserve resources when healthcare becomes unaffordable. Having several medics in case of harm by police is an extremely powerful morale booster during a protest that may become a police riot. When you become comfortable with the basics of first aid, riot medicine is the next suggested step.

Establish or join local Mutual Aid networks ✊

If you haven't already, get to know your neighbors. Mutual aid is a willingness to support and grow your community. This can include informal networks through friends, tenant/renter organizations, solidarity groups, and industrial unions.

These are groups using direct action to solve each other's problems. Building strong communities makes it difficult for fascism to take root. The actions of the government are going to hit every community hard, and the ones who build trust in each other and work together are most likely to survive. We've been building a list of resources in !inperson@slrpnk.net to help you on your way. Also check out this handy guide to find existing groups in your area.

This isn't only for your own community protection. Your ability to organize today will change the political landscape tomorrow. When revolution occurs, the social organizations that show the greatest resilience through the regime are the ones typically calling the shots when the dust settles. When it comes to elections, get out the vote drives are useless if most of the voters are fascists. At some point, you have to do grassroots political education if you don't want fascist candidates winning elections. Mutual aid networks are excellent forums not only for teaching each other good political ideas, but demonstrating them in practice.

Join a Union and Prepare for an even longer General Strike! 💪

If you aren't in a union (or even if you are, it's worth dual-carding), consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you'll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we manage to enact one, as most unions have a strike fund that can supplement your income during a general strike to make it more financially bearable (you should also save as much money as you can reasonably do, so it can also be used to keep yourself afloat during a strike).

And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn't listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above, and they'll help you set up a new local branch.

  • 🇦🇷 Argentina: FORA
  • 🇦🇺 Australia: ASF-IWA
  • 🇧🇷 Brazil: FOB
  • 🇧🇬 Bulgaria: ARS, CITUB
  • 🇩🇪 Germany: FAU
  • 🇬🇷 Greece: ESE
  • 🇮🇹 Italy: USI
  • 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 Netherlands & Belgium: Vriji Bond
  • 🇪🇸 Spain: CNT
  • 🇸🇪 Sweden: SAC
  • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: UVW

Adopt Security Culture and Digital Camouflage 🛡️

Sometimes benign seeming efforts can turn into unexpected personal data collecting traps. Like an obscure website for exchanging contact info with other students turning into a global ad-tech surveillance network (Facebook), or innocent seeming online personality tests being use to harvest character profiles. Even Etsy, Reddit, Tinder, and Duolingo are feeding information to US Government Agencies like ICE.

Security culture is commonly used to describe the general awareness of such potential traps and how it can affect groups or entire communities. This goes beyond mere individual privacy efforts, as without joint efforts these often fail to work.

Especially in activist circles, security culture is paramount. For opsec reasons not everyone in the group might be aware of what clandestine efforts others are involved in, but with a general security culture many potential data leaks can be avoided.

Movements are made by the volume of their participants, and the easier and less dangerous it is to participate, the more people will get involved. As more people get involved, individual involvement becomes even less dangerous, creating a virtuous cycle.

We'll start it off with some General Advice:

  • Mentally wall off personal uniquely identifying info from your online presence, actively build a habit of opsec so that withholding information is your default mental state
  • Be careful about who you meet online
  • Use different, unrelated usernames, passwords & emails for every account. And try not to connect to those accounts with your real IP address (use Tor or a VPN)
  • Be mindful that anything done online leaves a trail
  • agents provocateurs may seek to find patsies willing to perform an ill-advised illegal activity in order to legitimize police repression. If someone is trying to pressure you, especially if you don't have a long and proven history with them, be extremely wary.

For a full guide on what encrypted communications platforms to use, and how to stay off the radar, read the Digital Camouflage section within the Monthly Meta post here (you'll need to scroll down. I'd add it here, but it won't fit in this comment).

I'd also highly recommend Full Spectrum Resistance to anyone who wants further info on how to resist.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 20 hours ago

This is the one and now more of you are saying it.

This is the only way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I agree - but also, if anyone in congress deserves the benefit of the doubt, I'd say it's Sanders. I think the first major step back off this ledge is probably restoring the status quo. If we started on the exact best path forward tomorrow, I'm not sure it would START with abolishing ICE. It would start by utterly neutering them first, then dismantling them after eliminating their internal ability to resist, because we both know it'll be a loud and painful process no matter what.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 115 points 1 day ago (42 children)

Damn it Bernie, if only the Democrats hadn't sabotaged your campaign for Hillary. Where would we be today? Certainly not this hellscape. People would have forgotten Trump was even a presidential canidate by now. I'm so angry at what could have been

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree. The Clinton’s had some heavy baggage and a straight old white dude would’ve been interesting! Idk if he would’ve won but simply having his platform endorsed would’ve changed history. He was just as angry as Trump was. If only Harambe didn’t die.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But with Bernie you knew where he stood, you knew what he was pissed about and what systems he wanted to dismantle. The rich Dems of the east Coast south and west coast couldn't handle that.

It was literally the Midwest and iron belt that supported him and pacific nw that supported him

Trump was going to destroy everything for his own benefit not for the betterment of the general public.

Nebraska is a red state, I knew more people excited about Bernie than Trump, I threw a tantrum when Hillary got the nod and was told by better off people I knew in far bigger cities and with more money that Hillary was the safe bet. Still to this day same people so excited for Gavin Newsom, they post their hatred everyday about Trump but they aren't willing to vote for anyone who will put up a fight with the fip. Gavin isn't it

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've seen people claim that they were going to vote Bernie until Clinton won the nomination, then they switched to Trump.

My mind boggles at the sheer insanity of that change, but I guess they wanted someone "different." They didn't seem to care what "different" meant.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

20 years of AM radio fucked some people up.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

More like almost 100 years. Learned that on the It Could Happen Here podcast. Very good and stark background of how talk radio has been dividing this country since the 1930s, using religion as its Trojan horse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Clinton was a career politician that didn't advocate for any changes, short of small ones. Trump was seen as a buffoon who would get himself impeached soon after and allow Dems to take over the Senate and House. Little did anyone know he planned on just selling the US out completely.

load more comments (41 replies)
[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Not another penny for ICE ~~until Kristi Noem, Stephen Miller are gone~~

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm so sick of dems. Fuck you. Not another penny ever.

[–] Kaerkob@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

If you're ready to jettison the left most member of the caucus, how are you going to get anything done? Violent revolution?

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 6 points 20 hours ago

Sanders is an independent

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sanders (I-Vt.)

Doesn't that mean he's the independent senator(?) for Vermont?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Technically yes, but he caucuses with Democrats and generally caves to their demands and supports their positions, even though they rigged the primary against him.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 18 hours ago

Fair enough. I knew he didn't win the primary, so I thought he was perhaps as much "fuck dems" as the next person.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago

And then also no more money for ICE after that.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

At least he has a clear demand, but he should be calling for the abolition of ICE and prosecution of every criminal order given or carried out.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

IMO, immigration control in general is stupid. IDC where you're from or how you come to live here. Just pay the taxes to contribute to the community and those in need. Enforce it through the IRS like any other citizen. Abolish ICE entirely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] radiouser@crazypeople.online 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I was daydreaming differently.

But that will do, yes.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So the issue is not ICE, but who's managing ICE.

That's basically same as saying that the nazis were just following orders.

The issues, Bernie, are both who's managing ICE and ICE itself. ICE are terrorists, you can't just say that you will give money to ICE if they remove those two assholes ignoring all the shit each ICE agent has done so far, Bernie.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you missed the part where he wants drastic reform within the agency on top of axing the ghouls running it. He's much more likely to succeed politically with those types of demands than just straight up defunding the entire thing.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Can we stop pretending that compromising with the fascist institutions is the correct political move? Why? Why are people so stuck in the Obama mindset? It was and is a complete failure.

More Americans support abolishing ICE than oppose it!.

It is absolutely the right political move to abolish it. It's an institution younger than most Americans. Stop this "it's the right political move" bull shit. The American public does not agree with you.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

They'll just put someone else equally terrible in. No funding for ice until Trump and the GOP are goneffs.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

How about just abolishing ICE?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

You could have stopped that sentence earlier and had more of my support

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

That is setting the bar far too low. It’s buried, Bernie. You buried the fucking bar.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The only non pos senator.

Name one other, go ahead, we can look at them handing rifles to settlers in israel at a minimum, looking at you oregon.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›