this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
718 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

10305 readers
2406 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If a post is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Be nice. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements to private messages.
  7. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

The top 0.1% of 'earners' should be guillotined. No exceptions.
The new next top 1% have the choice to share until or be guillotined. They can still be rich, but not so disgustingly so.

This carries on until £50 million is the most anyone person/entity can hold. No offshore accounts. Shell companies etc etc etc. one account per person or company

Let's face it, if £50 million isn't enough then they deserve the guillotine.
Two accounts = guillotine.
Hide money = guillotine.
Put money in to your another person's/child's account then you have access, or use it yourself = guillotine.
Forgotten account? = guillotine.
Try to loophole it at all = guillotine.

Fuck the rich.

Edit:
Edited the percentage.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

£50 million puts a person in the top 0.1% in the US. Someone with $15 million net worth is already a 1 percenter in the US and world wide probably a $1 million in net worth puts you in the 1% of the world

[–] mudkip 3 points 6 hours ago

Yes We must take action

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

I don't think this will have the effects you think it will

[–] jonesey71@lemmus.org 3 points 6 hours ago

Batman was a superhero because he was rich. Lex Luthor was a supervillian because he was rich. Bezos made his choice and should be treated like the villian he is.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 27 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

He’s not worth $257 billion, that’s just what he’s been allowed to hoard.

Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

Financial obesity is a great term.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I’m all for fucking Bezos up but he’s not the CEO of Amazon anymore. Hasn’t been for a while now.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 1 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 55 minutes ago)

Yep! That’s just what he made this year by owning 9.5% of the company he used to sit around at for a cumulative month every year for.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Most of his net worth is still in Amazon stocks.

Being a CEO doesn’t come into it

[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 15 points 14 hours ago

Luigi them all.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Market economies need competition to work. If there would be a competitor with cheaper offers, Amazon would be worth much less and letting employees go would end up as cheaper prices for every customer while the unemployed can quickly find a new job.

Who is willing to build a competitor?

Otherwise it's time for a planned economy.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

More like "who can afford to build a competitor" when Amazon already has their 10,000 hrs in undercutting prices, surviving on a ~~raft~~ yacht of capital.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

There is an abundance of money right now. People will be happy to get rid of their dollars if there is a company that can break even while competing with Amazon.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 45 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I looked it up not that long ago and I'm pretty sure Amazon nets about a billion in less than a day. Not Bezos, but Amazon. And that's net, not gross.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 63 points 18 hours ago

Idk it's pretty gross if you ask me

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 24 points 17 hours ago (20 children)

His tax rate isn't related to his net worth, though. He didn't get a check for $59b.

You don't pay taxes on unrealized gains from investment vehicles, which is a good thing for the average person. Imagine having to pay a (mostly) perpetually increasing income tax on your 401k every year.

What needs to happen is the loans that banks give them against their non-liquid assets should be taxed as income.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The rich don't pay taxes on unrealized gains. The poor do. You haven't realized any gains on your house by owning it, but the taxes go up every single time it is re-assessed in value.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 30 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, let’s tax them as realized gains, because if you are using your unrealized gains as collateral, is that not a form of realizing their value?

I don’t care TBH, whichever one costs them more.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's basically the same as taxing the loans as income, but I'm down to double tax them.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

I don't think so. Just trigger a tax event on anything used as collateral for a loan.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

That doesn’t work. Houses are already taxed to hell, even unrealized gains on a house is taxed. So triple taxing when you use a house as collateral would hurt small business owners.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

We absolutely pay taxes on unrealized gains. Property tax is the tax of unrealized gains. We do it for houses why can’t we do it for stocks? He’s getting dividend checks worth moillions every quarter.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Portfolio loans need to be taxed. Absolutely. You can pay 1% interest on a loan vs ~30% on income taxes. Something will need to be done about shell corporations holding personal assets as well. His yacht isn’t in his name.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

If only there was a way to make sure the tax isn't levied on normal people... Oh well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Just tax wealth at twice the rate of inflation above 500 million dollars.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 18 hours ago (11 children)

He could have given each of these employees a million dollars and still had 13,000,000,000 left over.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 8 hours ago

amazon has a habit of shedding 10s of thousands of employees after hiring them, for tax breaks. almost right after, usually it only targeted the "low skilled workers" now its the higher skilled people too.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AlternateHuman02@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Nice, I finally canceled my membership with them, uninstalled the app and this post makes me feel even better. I made sure to fill out their survey after saying fuck billionaires, they don't deserve my money, and that Amazon has ruined small local business. Probably doesn't mater but every little bit helps. I just wish I had done it sooner.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

They are thieves, criminals, slavers and psychopaths. They will kill all of us for more power and for some fucked up reason we still let billionaires to exist.

[–] Liuone@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Is it that hard not to buy stuff from Amazon? I don't think I ever bought anything ever from Amazon and I make all kinds of online purchases almost every week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 5too@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

I always wonder what a modern day Robin Hood might look like in relation to people like this. How would such a person target a billionaire, and redistribute even some of that wealth to people who actually need it?

In particular, how would you do that at a billionaire's scale, in such a way that financial institutions don't or can't immediately claw it back?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Unfortunately, there are no folk heroes to save us. The fact of the matter is that we need to vote in all countries, and we need to vote not for “safe” centrists but for those who will actually push us towards more progressive policies. No “but this time is different, like the other twenty times, because of the scary right-wing!”, it’s do or die.

That’s really it. Robin Hood in this day and age is the IRS and whatever equivalents. Fund them, and give them the powers we need without fear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] llama@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

Her costume ring is only $20K though

load more comments
view more: next ›