this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
121 points (94.8% liked)

memes

19113 readers
2126 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

There is no 9 because 7 8 9.

[–] JelleWho@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

Time for Linux anyone?

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck does this mean?

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

OS I think ? There's no Windows 9, so I'm guessing there is no iOS 9 either ?

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Idk about loses, but there definitely is a Mac OS 9 ...

I guess it was just not relevant to the meme maker and I'm old. :(

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] anytimesoon@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And no windows phone 9.

(This fact brought to you by my vague recollection)

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I can confirm there was no iPod 9

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Newer software aimed at newer Windows versions usually had a code that checked the user's Windows version. If the version began with a 9, it was interpreted as one of the Windows 9x operating systems, for which the software was unsupported. If that was the case, the user couldn't run the software at all. Microsoft wanted to prevent such situation from happening with a new Windows release, so they skipped straight to 10.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

There was a function that would give you a monotonically-increasing build number that you could compare against the build that any given feature was added in that people should have used, but there was also a function that gave you the name of the OS, and lots of people just checked if that contained a 9. The documentation explicitly said not to do that because it might stop working, but the documentation has never stopped people using the wrong function.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Microsoft's version function didn't return what you think it returned. They would deliver massive changes to OS functionality and call it "second edition" or just some service pack number. The version function gave you the same value for all of it. Literally, the only way to know what version you were working with was to parse the name. Microsoft's own documentation on new functionality told you that was the way to do it. MS even gave you example code to copy and paste.
It wasn't until much later, well after the dumpster fire they had created was blazing away, that they took the time to revise the way any of it worked.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If you're checking for Windows 9 in order to disable features, which is what the jump straight to ten was supposed to protect against (when running a 16-bit binary for 3.1/95 on 32-bit Windows 10, it lies and says it's Windows 98), then you're using at least the Windows 2000 SDK, which provided GetVersion, which includes the build and revision numbers in its return value, and the revision number was increased over 7000 times by updates to Windows 2000.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Ya, that is what I thought, but skipped because I couldn't remember for sure. GetVersion didn't even exist until win2k, so everyone already had their code that checked version numbers written and squared away. They never needed to go back and change it or read the new documentation.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Mac OS 9 is absolutely a thing, 1999-2001.

And Mac OS 10.9 was Mavericks, in 2013.

[–] terminatortwo@piefed.social 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In this case I think they mean iPhone 9, which I’m still saving my money for

[–] maniel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

yeah, they released 8 and X simultaneously, what should they do next? release 9/11? badum tssss

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 23 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

In the mean time, Plan 9, since 1992,

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Please shove Glenda back into your funhole

[–] notptr@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Glenda is too powerful for this

[–] tenchiken@anarchist.nexus 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I see you are a person of refinement and taste.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 7 points 12 hours ago

I am honored but in truth i am but a simple pinguin follower of the holy world of analoque_nowhere

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What, he does. He’s gone on record saying he doesn’t want anything to do with Doctor Who

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 11 minutes ago

Ah. That's not true anymore, he's since said he's made peace with it. He really likes attending cons and he's doing Big Finish (with Billie ❤️). He wouldn't return to the show though, especially while RTD is running it.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 15 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Number 9 is sometimes pronounced ku — with the same pronunciation as agony or torture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_superstitions

[–] mech@feddit.org 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

And the same pronunciation as "no" in German.
In Cantonese, the number 9 is also a vulgar way of saying penis (𨳊, Cantonese Yale: gāu)

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago

In Hebrew, the letter with the value of 7 also means slang for penis!

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

In French, 9 sounds like “new” (neuf).

[–] tenchiken@anarchist.nexus 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The X in MacOS X is not a Roman numeral.

It's the X from NeXT.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeXT_Computer

The original Mac software had an emulator to run when OS X came out, but NeXTStep was a different system entirely and not just an iteration on the same OS.

Cute comic though.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

Uhm no? The X is a Roman numeral and makes sense as it succeeded classic OS 9. OSX is based on NeXTStep though an Objective-C still carries its prefix with it (all Types are prefixed with NS for example NSString)

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I guarantee this is because they think people are so stupid they'll see it as a 6 and think it's 2 down from 8 instead of one up.

(They're right)

[–] DarkSirrush@piefed.ca 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Windows did it because every programmer/scriptkiddie/etc ever checked if the version was 95/98 by looking for the 9, instead of separate checks for both.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

programmer/scriptkiddie/etc

cd: no such file or directory

[–] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 12 hours ago

You don't have a ~/programmer/script kiddie/etc directory? I thought everyone did.