this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
164 points (99.4% liked)

politics

27307 readers
2431 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you want them to act, you're going to have to call your senators

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It is time for Blue No Matter Who to be left in the past. It is getting people killed and 7 Dems showed why in real time the who does matter in who you elect.

Yes blocking Republicans is important but also putting the right people in power is just as important.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago
[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 17 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Democrats always manage to muster up enough votes to get Republican legislation passed, and the rest of the party can distance themselves saying we voted no. They're all complicit.

Rotating villain strategy.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 53 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Funding bill let Democrats make a statement without creating a standoff.

That's a very optimistic way of saying "lets Democrats make a feeble token gesture of mild disagreement while still going along wholly with the fascist program."

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Who could have seen this coming? I, for one, am now satisfied that the democrats did everything they possibly could do. They really sent a strongly worded letter here, and I’m all for it. Great work guys!

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 0 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

What they can potentially do is have the Senate shut down other parts of the government in protest.

ICE is already funded for years to come; it will take an affirmative vote to remove that money, and you can't do that when in the minority.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 22 hours ago

Optics. They need to be taking more extreme measures. The fact that ICE is funded for quite a while is not a good reason to capitulate to the republicans. They continue to prove, time and again, that they are unwilling to take drastic action to stop the fascists. They’d rather play by the rules, and lose.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

What a stupid game.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

DHS spending bill passed 220-207

7 Democrats voted in favor:

  • Henry Cuellar
  • Don Davis
  • Laura Gilles
  • Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
  • Jared Golden
  • Vicente Gonzalez
  • Tom Suozzi

Massie voted No

Andy Harris didn't vote

Might not have passed if every Democrat voted No, but leadership wasn't whipping them to do so

Please note that Henry Cueller is the senior house rep on the Appropriations Committee. If Dems retake Congress, he will be the chair.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 9 points 19 hours ago

They weren't whipping up no votes because this is what they wanted. Democrats love the tools of a police state as much as Republicans.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 20 hours ago

And because Jeffries gave him all his appointments back after Trump pardoned him for corruption.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago

make a statement

Do nothing

[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I'm done with these pussy fuck Democrats. Bunch of useless pacifist dipshits. Notice how the only states that are impotently dealing with ICE have leftists who all voted for statewide gun control laws and are totally reliant on the mere hope that local law enforcement to protect them? The same ones they were okay with equipment up to par with an almost militarized level? Why aren't their huge budget militarized cops do something?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a side note- ICE/BPC is fully funded through the Big Bullshit Bill, so shutting the gooberment down won't stop the madness.

[–] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 41 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Not saying this is you, but for a very long time, the moderate argument is, "we can't get a total victory here, so we shouldn't bother resisting Republicans" and, frankly, I'm done with that line of thinking. If it makes Republicans life harder, it must be done. If they have to explain to their voting base why they aren't willing to make ICE agents unmask in order to keep TSA staffed at airports, that is worth making them do. I don't expect a miracle, I expect a spine

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 24 points 23 hours ago

I agree. Our rights are not a place for compromise.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Agreed. Totally agree.

If only one side ever compromises, it’s not compromise, it’s capitulation.

I’m more in the way of limiting expectations as well as pointing out that every measure, every appointment, every vote is a new battle.

We’re in the place we are because dems have been capitulating for as long as I’ve been voting (longer, probably.)

(I may be pissed at klobechar for voting to confirm appointments.)

Edit to add: maybe they shouldn't have voted to approve cloture, hmmm?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 19 hours ago

I feel like most folks dislike TSA enough that them being understaffed may be seen as a bonus.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

Democrats ~~Get ICE Protest Vote But Shy Away From Forcing a Shutdown~~ Do Fuck All and Not A Damn Thing in Hopes of a Nice Participation Trophy and a Lollipop.

FTHFY Blommberg. I'll send you an invoice.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Democrats phone in some failure theater while actually doing absolutely nothing

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

I love big statements.

I love results even more.

Cowardly bastards.