sunbrrnslapper

joined 3 years ago
[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

This guy is a nut. We shouldn't be giving him any attention other than to dismiss him.

I once couldn't get to a client meeting because a goose was in front of their office door. Those things are mean!

To be fair, it is a truly unpopular opinion.

Due to business changes, we had to swap out the overview of each service and replace them with different services. Each of which included an overview, our service approach and an example project. There were 9 new services. That then required the 2 exercises and the purpose/agenda slides to be updated. There were some other contextual slides that needed tweaks. I also hated the color scheme of the original deck and had that update throughout.

I still had to do work on the deck. It does things like gets goal and outcome confused (which matters for us). Also the overall structure needed some help.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Genius! I hope you did well there 🙂

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I tell it and provide source materials. I'm getting better at providing the right guidance and content to get decent results. If you give it terrible direction, it will completely shit the bed.

Edit: you gotta treat it like a brand new employee who has terrible judgement. If you offer that level of direction, then it works pretty well.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Ah, great question. I use it to build first drafts of thing that would take me several hours to do myself. So not only is it faster, I'm able to complete other work while the agent is working. My productivity has gone up 50-100%. I can't afford to hire another me, so this helps to bridge the gap.

Specific example: Today it rebuilt a 30 slide training deck while I did some marketing tasks and troubleshooted a Google/Outlook calendar issue created by a new hire. When Cowork was done I reviewed and modified the training deck. Time saved ~5 hours.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Hopefully it won't go the way of the Zune (why was brown even a color option!?!). It genuinely helps my small business. 🤷

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Under his watch MS missed the smartphone boat, waffled between consumer and commercial products, Windows Vista, Bing, stack ranking employees, organizational silos, pushed a know it all mindset (as opposed to a learning mindset), etc.

The next CEO did a lot of cleanup for many years.

 

Does it cost me $10 per run? Yes. Is it worth every penny? Absolutely.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Balmer was a terrible CEO by nearly every measure, but the one that stands out for me is the culture he cultivated where team members would actively undermine one another just for a better performance review.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I'm constantly shouting "not now Copilot!" at my computer. It does not listen (I mean, it does, it just doesn't obey).

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What is the time commitment for that many comments?

 

U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday threatened to use the Insurrection Act, which would allow him to deploy military forces, in Minnesota amid escalating tension over a deployment of federal agents in the state's most populous city, which has become the focus of daily clashes.

"If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don’t obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists from attacking the Patriots of I.C.E., who are only trying to do their job, I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT," Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

 

OMFG

 
 
 

Mods: I was unsure if a politics-related rant was ok. If not: sorry!

Over the last month and a little, we've watched the disruption and/or dismantling of key US government programs and agencies - fundamentally undermining the power of Congress and the balance of power in the federal government. We've also started to see the Executive Branch ignore court orders - undermining the Judicial Branch and further erroding the balance of power.

We are watching this happen while our Congressional leaders take no meaningful action. There is no plan to restore balance to the federal government, no call to action for citizens to take, no one steering the ship. Our leaders have failed us in a spectacular way.

How did we get here? Well... everyday Americans are falling behind - driven by low wages, high cost of living, and economic instability. And we are watching big business and the rich influence our leaders in ways that are actively harmful to individual Americans.

In November people were given the option between the status quo or dramatic change. And people voted for change - albeit bad change. Desperate people do desperate things.

But the vast majority of Americans don't want to get rid of democracy. They don't want to break the international order. They don't want someone who doesn't meet the requirements to become president to boss the actual president around.

This is, at its core, a nonpartisan issue. We want the government to work for us again: of the people, by the people, for the people.

On several occasions I've seen or heard people asking "what can we do?" In the absence of direction from our leaders, I thought I'd share specific things that I am asking my representatives to actively support. Maybe, if enough of us ask, we can create the pressure and momentum required to enact change:

Re-assert Congressional power Enact a law (or laws) that increase transparency, demand accountability, and strengthen checks and balances. Override a veto if necessary. Why: this reestablishes the balance of power intended by our founders.

Limit or eliminate political donations Limit maximum annual donations (to candidates, parties, PACs and Super PACs) to $2k/year per entity or person - or get rid of them all together. Why: this ensures that our leaders are influenced by their constituents and not the highest bidder.

Set Congressional term and age limits Limit years in Congressto no more than 20 years and no older that 75. Why: this creates an ongoing rotation of leaders rather than people clinging to power.

These things won't solve all of our problems, but will allow the American people to begin an actual dialogue without influence - from which we can tackle issues affecting the country.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

 

Mt Rainier from Seward Park

 
 
 
view more: next ›