this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
567 points (98.8% liked)

tumblr

6175 readers
105 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 86 points 3 months ago (2 children)

SCIENCE is BAD so we're going to Give BABIES Diseases for Science!

-Republicans but LITERALLY!

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

Dead for many, many years.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

At this point, Republicans are just cinobites. Pain and suffering is good, anything that removes it is bad.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm seeing some conflicting reports indicating that study might have been canceled, there's conflicting information from different sources. Still awful that this was even considered in the first place.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 months ago

I found this Guardian Article pretty comprehensive. In includes and explains the uncertainty about the status.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/15/hepatitis-b-vaccines-study-africa-cancel

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because I've seen conflicting reports and I don't want to inadvertently spread misinfo.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That's what caveats are for. Also if it's a dodgy source, people will definitely let you know. Unsourced information may as well be misinformation.

[–] Eldritch_Alyx@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So the US are experimenting on foreign newborns?

Real pro-life there, buddy.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The US is a rogue state. What do you expect?

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

Its gov to burn finally

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

So we are at the eugenics part of the Amerikkklan Nazi Regime.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 37 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Nah. The US has always done shit like this to minorities, domestically and abroad.

Some experiments on US citizens:

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Yeah one reason among many why many black people (and maybe other poc?) don’t trust the healthcare system in the us.

[–] logi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

For some extra fun, search for Denmark Greenland and forced contraceptives. It gives more flavour to how the toddler in chief is demanding that somebody get him Greenland.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 5 points 3 months ago

The US never actually stopped it, really.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

in collaboration with researchers in Denmark

So much for a utopian socialist society (pay no attention to those men behind the green curtain!)

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lol you thought the Danes were the good guys!?

[–] BunScientist@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps not good, but maybe not as evil

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I will give the Danes "not the appearance of evil currently award". They have an ever growing income inequality and are scared of the typical bogeymen like Muslims. They got some deep seated issues so it is only a matter of time.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_review_board ...

is necessary in the 21st century globally

and we rarely talk about the Doctors Trial of the Nazis.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

thank fuck, jesus fucking christ how evil can one administration be

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 7 points 3 months ago

They know they can't (currently) do studies like this in the US, but they can in other countries.

RFK jr. Is an indirect serial killer, that is my theory. He had his ex-wife and a few other people he knew commit suicide due to his abuse.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And you kind of know already that this study will be manipulated so that is shows that vaccination is bad and then millions of people will be harmed.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 3 months ago

Given that he said things like 'we will know by september' for some studies and come that date he has 'data' to prove his point. All of it is bullshit and all he knows is that no matter what there will be shit that he can twist into proving his claim.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 months ago

This tweet is conflating two different countries, Guinea and Guinea-Bissau, using their names interchangeably. The linked article is solely about the latter.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No, no, look - they are pro-life. Just not this life in particular. This life can go fuck itself.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago
[–] hamid@crazypeople.online 3 points 3 months ago

The Hague? The court that Americans can't be tried at because they don't recognize the ICCs jurisdiction and are not a member of the Rome statute?

Real problems don't have liberal solutions. The Americans deserve far worse.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

He's experimenting on your children to work through his own ignorance.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

We can't do much with the US researchers, because noets face it, that third world banana republic doesn't care about dead babies, only dead fetuses

The Danish researchers, though, those should be arrested and jailed

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't see the point of the study tbh. ~~But neither the outrage~~. Mostly because not every country vaccinates at the same time after birth so there's no need to test it specifically. Just compare infants from different countries.

You don't even have to go that far. Denmark vaccinates right after birth (if I can understand Der gives tre doser på hhv. dag 0, efter 1 måned og efter 6 måneder. correctly) while Germany vaccinates after 2 months: Die ersten beiden Impfungen im Alter von 2 und 4 Monaten, die dritte Impfung im Alter von 11 Monaten. Literally just take a sample from both of these countries.

I was apparently vaccinated after 2 months, 3 months, 4 months and 1 year according to my vaccine certificate.

Edit: Small update, can see the issue with doing this in Guinea-Bisset

[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I guess we can all see why you aren't a scientist.

Guinea-Bisset has one of the highest rates of Hep B infections in the world. Nearly 1 in 5 people there have chronic Hep B, and 90% of babies exposed at birth develop a chronic infection.

In America, 1 in 1,200 have Hep B. Not 1 in 5. DRASTICALLY more people have Hep B in Guinea-Bisset, greatly increasing the chance of infant exposure.

That's why there is outrage. This should be basic common sense.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

If the rate is so low in the US, why would it be unethical to do it there? You could also take samples from babies whose parents are getting or refusing the vaccine anyways. Sure, those decisions on their own will introduce more variables, but they could do a "outcomes of being raised by pro/anti vaccine/medicine parents" study.

If the goal was the truth, at least. It would be hard to do that study without any bias either way, with how political the whole thing is.