this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
747 points (99.3% liked)

Political Memes

11805 readers
2476 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hell, even if the Republicans had held the convictions they espoused on Jan 7th, we'd be done with his insanity and cruelty...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] basket@pie.gravitywell.xyz 64 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Call me woke or whatever but im against capital punishment in any instance

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 86 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think we can find some middle ground between the death penalty and allowing the person to become president again.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My middle ground is I believe some crimes deserve the death penalty, but I believe the state should never have the right to execute its citizens.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Outsource their executions to El Salvador.

"Oh no, you misunderstood. We said we wouldn't execute you."

[–] saimen@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe bring back social ostracism? The person loses all rights and privileges. Meaning even killing them will not be prosecuted.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My issues with the state executing people is two fold. The first being if you allow the state to have that right it can change the laws and begin executing people for less severe offenses. The second and more crucial, is there are always mistakes made and you should not put an innocent person to death. Vigilant killings or those outside the system only make that worse. Truthfully you've described a very cruel punishment when life in prison works fine

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I'd add a third issue. In a democracy, your social systems are the agency of the people as a whole. We collectively bear responsibility for those systems. By condoning the death penalty we embrace cold blooded killing for revenge, when it is done as a collective. Those in favour of the death penalty are thinking about the perpetrator and why we want to hurt that person, and not about the mental health of our society and why we should not be debasing ourselves. When I've discussed these matters with USAns, this issue is usually ignored or dismissed, and I think that says a lot about the condition of that society.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

So imprison then on St Helens?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I generally am as well, but considering the circumstances, I'm willing to make an exception in this case.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I don't want to make martyrs. I want them to grow old and frail watching their legacies crumble and their fortunes taken from them. Death is too quick for fascists.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Just like Mussolini the well know Italian maytr

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Life is too short to waste on extremely dangerous lost causes. Decide, execute, learn, prevent, move on.

Human rights are one thing. But extreme human rights violations and war criminals are another. Preaching tolerance for the intolerant is wrong.

You ever watch the Alien movies? Imagine thinking jailing a xenomorph is a good idea. Hubris.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There is no purpose to a bad person suffering, but I'd be lying if I said would not feel gleeful catharsis if certain powerful people's finger nails were ripped out, their eye's gouged, their balls smashed, their individual teeth crushed and ripped out, their skin then flayed off their bodies, and then their whole bodies set on fire to finish them off.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Sure, but that's exactly why people should not have the authority to decide punishments. Even if I agreed with you in this case, capricious torture would absolutely be used by the people we hate against the people we care about. Our first order of business should be to restore a functional justice system.

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Please stop talking like that. This is like describing the most delicious hamburger to guys starving in a POW camp.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

AGreed. If rights aren't applied even to those we hate, they aren't rights, they're privileges.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I think there are definitely instances where a person has done something terrible enough that they should no longer be sharing an earth with the rest of us. Treason that results in hundreds or thousands of deaths (like sabotage, espionage) is one of them, attempting a coup is one of them, really deranged murders are one of them, etc.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unless it's on billionaires.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Its hard to define such laws.

I'm afraid that racist poor whites would use the ensuing chaos after such a hypothetical revolution to vandalize Asian American small bussiness owners because they deem them "rich" and try to lynch us. I don't want my family getting lynched, I don't want another LA Riot happening, it'd be terifying for us.

When North Vietnam won the Vietnam War, they made policies that effectively forced the Chinese diaspora to flee the country.

I don't exactly like revolutions, I prefer a democratic transition.

[–] rarsamx@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Aren't we all one mistake away from becoming billionaires?

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 months ago

I'd generally agree but there comes a point where a certain person has done so much intentional harm (in/directly killing so many) and is just above any law or judge... that i'd look the other way if they get Kirk'ed.
The laws, no matter how corrupt, are there for a reason. If even that fails... well, there's guillotines.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Punishment: Cersei Lannister Style Walk of Shame

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you want Trump to walk naked down the street? Who is being punished here

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ever heard of the infamous 34 criminal convictions?

Google Trump Rule 34 for more info

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

OK thanks for the suggestion Be right back

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

This entire administration doesn't know or understand the word shame.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I'm also against the death penalty, and don't advocate for it in any instance.

But I'm not gonna be sad if he is executed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Friendly reminder that south korea is a straight up oligarchy. They're doing good in the instance, but they're not as much better than the usa as they would like you to think

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey you know what's so interesting about Korea?

They got two dystopias in one peninsula.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Two for the price of one.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I keep wondering which one of the two countries will first implement cyberpunk: the Sovereign Chaebol of Samsung or the United State of FAANG.

[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Yes. Geunhye Park, the president from a few years back who was caught red handed embezzling millions and consulting a shaman on national policy barely got a slap on the wrist and was back rubbing shoulders with politicos like a year later. The cronyism goes deep here.

[–] boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Imagine living in a functioning country.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

South Koreans can only imagine it as well. It is a grim dystopia for the working class there either way, this is just a skirmish between two factions in their oligarchy.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If there is to be a death penalty, it should be used against the wealthy and powerful.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

They have shown they cant be trusted to run society.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

That’s how your supposed to do it

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Life in prison without possibility of release is just an forgone death sentence.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago

Put Trump in a cell where he can see a golf course he'll never play.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

One simple “hack”….

FWIW, axes are more efficient than guillotines.

[–] Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Taking out the people at the top seems like the answer to many of the worlds problems.. my own solution to the Greenland thing is that we take out Trump, I’ll even tell you how I would do it, remove the US nukes from the tips of UKs trident missile and replace with tungsten rods then use it like the Russians use oreshnik for a sub launched ballistic missile kinetic strike on mar a lago to turn it into a big hole. Imagine the world wide celebration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Life in prison would be enough.
Although... it is treason... dunno.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago

I disagree. With treason you've gotta go for the kill for a few reasons. Firstly there's the obvious violent prison break followed by an armed coup. Second it splinters their followers; without a strong leader the group is far more likely to turn on itself. Thirdly it reinforces the idea that coup's are the most dangerous move you can make and no matter who you are there's an absolute and final punishment.

Look where the US is now after not killing the traitors. Normally I'm staunchly against the death penalty but in instances like this it's truly for the greater good.

load more comments
view more: next ›