this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
424 points (99.5% liked)

News

37364 readers
1930 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Texas officials have turned over the state’s voter roll to the U.S. Justice Department, according to a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, complying with the Trump administration’s demands for access to data on millions of voters across the country.

The Justice Department last fall began asking all 50 states for their voter rolls — massive lists containing significant identifying information on every registered voter in each state — and other election-related data. The Justice Department has said the effort is central to its mission of enforcing election law requiring states to regularly maintain voter lists by searching for and removing ineligible voters.

Alicia Pierce, a spokesperson for the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, told Votebeat and The Texas Tribune that the state had sent its voter roll, which includes information on the approximately 18.4 million voters registered in Texas, to the Justice Department on Dec. 23.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 114 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Republicans really are fucking idiots aren't they

No disrespect to any fucking idiots reading this

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 46 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I think I speak for all fucking idiots when I say this, thank you for not disrespecting us because WOW we are dumb but we aren't Texas dumb!

[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Spongebob and Patrick were right all along

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 93 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Right now it will be used to cull "illegals."

Later it will be used to cull the "politically unreliable."

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The definition of "illegals" will expand to more and more groups.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ding ding ding.

The Trump regime has already floated the idea of suspending citizenship, and has already told those that don’t agree with them to ‘leave’.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Republican Party right now: "they're the same picture!"

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

cull

OK that's bad, but they can do so much more with such data. Like, make sure they "win" the election.

Is that legal, that the federal government can demand this from states?

Honestly voter registration (with party affiliation) just feels illegal to me.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Texas doesn't have party affiliation in voter registration.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

No, but they do track which primary we choose to vote in, which locks you in for any runoffs and serves as a defacto party registration until the next primary.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

It does give historical context that "they" use in the "likely " polling forecasts, but the affiliation itself expires at the end of the calendar year of the primary. Not saying that the data can't be used maliciously, but it's legally different then what people mean when they talk about their voter registration having that information. States that have that on your voter registration are also likely to have closed primaries, which Texas does not.

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 82 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Interesting.

Last election, Elon used his scam lottery to collect names and details of independent voters.

One of his dodge hires had written a full test software for voting machines, including a program to use names and data to generate votes for testing.

Those states then all had the increased single vote percentages move a significant margin to all vote red.

Now they are telling the states to give them the same data....

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

This doesn’t get mentioned nearly enough.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

Last election, Elon used his scam lottery to collect names and details of ~~independent voters~~ members of the Trump cult pretending to be independent.

Fixed it for you.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The state that constantly wanted to secede is now getting as cozy as could be with the federal government.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

texas is pretty much russia2.0, as far as how the govt is ran, its a template for the rest of the country.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

This is exactly why I changed my registration to independent in 2016. I knew this shit was coming and I for one am not willingly putting myself on a registered "enemies list" for a fascist fuckwit to use against me. Unfortunately in NY that means I can't vote in primaries...

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That may not help though, if you don't support them, you're a target. You don't have to be dem to be targeted you just have to be a problem.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I suppose, but if I'm ever questioned about it I can just make up some b.s about living in NY and was afraid that the evil leftist communist Venezuela loving Democrats would hurt me if I registered as Republican.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hope you posted this on a VPN and have never logged into your account without it

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We don't have party affiliation on the voter registration forms here though.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

The information includes what party's primary you voted in.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

When I lived in Texas I registered as a Republican so I could vote in the primary.

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Might actually be a good idea if everyone registered as Republican. Then there's no way to tell who's really going to vote for them. Hah, sorry I forgot there probably won't be any more votes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago

The whole premise of "registering as a xxxxxx" is screwed up.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago

Sorry but registering as Independent doesn’t save you. If you still speak out you go on the list.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

For a state that loves to say "don't mess with [us]", they sure are a bunch of dumb little bitches.

The next time a democrat decides to take over Texas, or whatever the hell they thought Jade Helm was, they'll have this list now too.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Bet 'The don't tread on me' sovcit folks are knotted and contorted messes now. Where'd all yer flags go now, ya cunts.

[–] retreaux@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry about them, they didn't hear about this news at all and wouldn't care even if they did. Everyone in that camp will fall in line with Daddy Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Aren't these already public? Whenever I canvas they give us a list with everyone registered and their party affiliation, and if people ask how we know we tell them that it's from the voter rolls.

[–] jonathan7luke@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm kinda confused here as well. You've been able to request voter records for years now, and they already include basically all the information the article is talking about: https://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/forms/pi.pdf. There are several websites that submit these requests and then publish the results online for free. My voting history (including name, address, age, etc.) has been up on these sites for years. I do not like that at all, but I have no control over it. I'm not really sure what is different about what was handed over from Texas to the federal government...

[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Washington State refused the request because the feds wanted socials, license numbers, signatures, birthdates, and other information protected by state law. They happily shared the general info like name and address, but the feds are trying to sue to get the protected parts too.

[–] jonathan7luke@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Ah, yep, that's what it is. Thanks for the clarification. Found this in another article:

The state included identifiable information about voters, including dates of birth, driver’s license numbers and the last four digits of their Social Security numbers, Pierce said.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I can’t tell if this is just for those currently registered or if it includes previous.

Glad i no longer live in texas

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Experts and state officials around the country have raised concerns over the legality of the Justice Department’s effort to obtain states’ voter rolls and whether it could compromise voter privacy protections.

I always thought these were public record. TIL, I guess.

[–] green_red_black@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope as the rolls contain very sensitive information such as home addresses and legal names.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago (9 children)

That's not exactly sensitive info. Property records are very public with that same info.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

With your driver's license info included?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Many states (including Texas) require voters to register as a member of a political party. Texas just handed the Feds a list of all the voting Democrats in Texas.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Oops, accidentally purged the registration of 1,000,000 voters in the Democrat folder

Honest mistake, no cap frfr

[–] Tempus_Fugit@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Counting on TX being a POS state has never been a bad bet.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

FUCK THIS STATE

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Can anyone truly say they dont think voting is rigged?

I mean im certain it was rigged with paper ballets, just a little more difficult. But we have voting machines programmed by musks friends/fans. There's no way votes matter and probably haven't for 20 years.

load more comments
view more: next ›