this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
148 points (98.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36451 readers
1033 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

The Demon Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark - Carl Sagan

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

"The name of the wind"

It will teach them to deal with frustration and disappointment.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Meeshall65@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Personally one of my favorite books

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Ishmael - Daniel Quinn

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I gonna add one that I actually read in school and actually Am very grateful I read it.

Its "Der gute Mensch von Sezuan" (The good human from Sezuan) by Berthold Brecht.

The story is, that the gods try to fund a good human in the town Sezuan and disguise themselves as humans seeking shelter. No one wants to give them shelter except a prostitute name Shen-Te. As a reward for being a good person they give her gold in return, which she uses to open her own shop. However, her buisness is not very succesfull, since she wants to help as many people as possible which means a big financial burden. To help her out of this she invents her cousin (?) Shui-Ta who is cold and regularly saves the buisness by not helping people and demanding things. This way the buisness stays open and Shen-Te can continue to help her community.

Basically the book is an analogism for why capitalism can not work, since the force to make a profit forces you to fuck over other people and it is not possible to not take part in this system on an individual level. I hated all other books we had to read in school, but I Am quite great I read that one. It also definitely played a role in my path towards becoming a communist.

Another upside of it is, that its rather short and can be easily read in about 2-3h.

[–] lorski@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Ishmael by Daniel Quinn

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd actually add the bible. A lot of people would be more atheist if they actually read through it. It would also be hilarious to see teenagers struggle with that long ass boring shit

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Lmao, are you gonna be tested on the genealogy in Genesis 5

[–] KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Anne Frank's diary. There is the historic relevance, but apart from that it is the inner world of a teen girl. I read it as a teen as well, and I remember it greatly resonated with me. She was of course in a unique and threatening situation, bit she also was just a teen, struggeling with typical teen issues. You know how it ends, but over the book you learn so much about her, her family and how they are trying to make tge mkst of it. You start rooting for her. And despite you knowing how it ends I felt quite empty when it did.

Also, a well written sex ed book. I have no specific one in mind, but a medicly accurate book explaining the female and male hormone cycles, menstruation, pregnancy (control including abortion) and menopause! And yeah, goes into how to actually have sex, that it's important to talk about boundaries etc.

[–] DavidDoesLemmy@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

Make sure to get the uncensored version where she goes into great detail about masturbation.

[–] SelfHigh5@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Diary of a Young Girl, Anne Frank, was required reading where I lived in the US, in the mid-90s. I was in Arkansas. My daughter went to school in Missouri and California (2010s) and I don’t remember her having to read it. Not sure if it’s regional or if the decade made the difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 79 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. 

"One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world.

"The other, of course, involves orcs."

[John Rogers, Kung Fu Monkey -- Ephemera, blog post, March 19, 2009]

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] presoak@lazysoci.al 2 points 1 day ago

Promethea by Alan Moore

[–] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just because someone reads a book, doesn't mean that they understand it, and if they're forced to read something they probably won't enjoy it.

I think catcher in the rye is a good book for boys of that age to read. The main character is insufferable because he holds views similar to incel culture. Problem is some people identify with Holden.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I was forced to read Animal Farm in early high school and didn't like it or really try to understand it. I re-read it as an adult just because I wanted to and I loved it. Any time there was a reading project with a list of books to choose from rather than a single forced choice, I enjoyed it way more. The choice really does make a difference

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Catcher in the rye was a forced book for me and I didnt like it because I thought Holden was insufferable lol. Why do you think it’s a good book to read?

[–] Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I dunno that adding a book would be helpful. I don't know that it is, but it feels like media literacy is at a bit of a low right now.

I don't really know how to teach someone to identify the themes in a book, not this specific book but any book. Do you just read a lot and contrast and compare until you're doing it subconsciously all the time with all books.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I think the main flaw is our actual way we teach literature in schools. I personally hated reading up until doing a “journal club” in college which was more like a book club that we would all read some assigned peer reviewed journals and then discuss them in an open environment. It made it where you couldn’t really participate unless you read the articles and the professor would facilitate the conversation so we would discuss certain things if no one else naturally brought it up. I don’t think that would really be possible in a 30 person class of high schoolers but if you took a smaller group of maybe 10 kids and instead of them just writing about the book had them talk in a group setting about a book like animal farm and which sections they found interesting or what sorts of parallels they see in modern times I think could engage students much more

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago (8 children)
[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Was offered this in high school. I read Brave New World and Island by Aldous Huxley instead. I'd say those.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Same here, Canada?

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I love Brave New World, but couldn't get into Island at all. I still have it though, I should give it another go.

[–] eightpix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way into Island is really buying into the paradise that it would be and being willing to learn the ways of the Palanese. Oh, and a healthy disdain for the world you'd leave behind.

I figure that's only gotten easier with time.

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ha, yes, certainly got plenty of disdain for the world. I'll give it another go 👍

[–] SarahFromOz@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

The novel that never stops being relevant.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Passion and Reason, by Richard and Bernice Lazarus. It’s a very accessible book about the connections between thoughts and emotions. Understanding what’s covered in it would save a lot of people a ton of confusion and social hardship in life.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Demon-Haunted World by Carl Sagan. If nothing else, it might help some people learn to recognize scams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Going against the grain here a little, I don't like required reading in schools.

I really loved reading growing up, always had a book (sometimes more than one) that I was reading, read well above my grade level, chose books that challenged myself, etc.

My high school really pushed reading, lots of classes assigned books for us to read, I think even some of the math classes had novels they were supposed to read. For our homeroom period once a week we had to do mandatory SSR (Sustained Silent Reading) where we had to be reading something, we couldn't do homework or go see our teachers for help, or anything of the sort, we had to be seated at our desks reading silently. I often was juggling 2 or 3 assigned books along with my other school work, activities, and hobbies, which didn't really leave me much time for the books that I chose to read for myself.

And the pacing was terrible, we'd often spend weeks on a book, analyzing it to death, doing packets of worksheets, writing reports, doing that accursed "popcorn reading" in class, etc. for books that I could have read in a matter of days if not hours.

I think we spent nearly a month on Of Mice and Men, it's only around 100 pages, it can be read in an afternoon.

The whole experience really killed my love of reading. I resented a lot of the books I was made to read, and now almost 2 decades later I've never quite been able to get back into the same kind of reading habit I used to have.

I've made an effort since then to go back and reread some of those assigned books I hated back in school, and the wild thing is that, overall, they were really good books, strong stories, well-written, solid lessons to teach, different points of view to consider, etc. I totally understand why they were assigned reading.

But when I first read them I was just going through the motions, I just wanted to get the damn books out of the way so that I could read what I wanted to read.

And I think the key is to make kids want to seek out those books. Don't assign them 1984 (for example,) make them want to go out and read 1984 for themselves.

I don't know what the best way to do that is, but it's not just telling them to read those books. If anything, it might be telling them not to read them. I can only speak for myself, but I know that personally seeing a display on "banned books" at a book store or library always made me way more interested in those books than any amount of recommendations from friends or reviews online or any other form of marketing.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So how do you study literature without having the class all read the same book? Can't really have a discussion on the themes of a work if the class isn't all reading the same thing.

[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This is important. My first solution reading the comment was to just focus on number of books and let the kids pick their own to get the love of reading. However this would be very difficult for a teacher to maintain if they wanted to do any analysis.

So maybe have a short list of a variety of books, and the material could be prepared to discuss themes. Maybe also having students present/teach others what they learned?

There would have to be one or two books at least in a year that were an assigned read for the whole class to get deeper into the text.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago

I happened to enjoy most of the assigned books. I'd have the same issue in class with the amount of time given on each book, but I'd use it to my advantage. I'd usually just read each book twice on my own, chill out and more or less slack off while in class, and still answer any questions or do the work better than anyone else because I knew the subject matter better than any other students. I'd ready something like the oddesey a couple times over a weekend and then have a month where I didn't have to use any effort at all in that class.

I give my grandma props to my reading. I went over to Grandma and Grandpa's a lot and from the age of like 1 she would read me childrens picture books. Many times I'd ask for the same one again and again and shed lovingly read it to me. I could follow along looking at the words (she'd point with her finger at each word as she read) long before I learned sounds each letter would make. I could just recognize a word by what the word looked like in the book. I could read at a 5th grade level in first grade, and by 5th grade I tested out to its max of 12+.

Thanks, Grandma. Miss you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] juliebean@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago

well, the effect of required reading seems to be killing kids' enjoyment of reading, so, if we wanna double down on that, i reccomend the Silmarrillion, by JRR Tolkein. or maybe a phone book.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The Jungle - Upton Sinclaire

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bsit@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

How to Read a Book https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Read_a_Book

Because people severely lack media literacy. People say read Orwell... and alt-right was saying it for years too.

There's someone in this thread saying kids should be forced to read Orwell. Which I think illustrates the issue perfectly...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The golden compass trilogy.

Because it talks about how adults kill kids souls just like real life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

The Parable series by Octavia Butler

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago

I don't know why a random nordic plumber should get to decide something like that. I'll pass. I don't feel qualified.

load more comments
view more: next ›