381
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] suction@lemmy.world 170 points 7 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I’m so tired of hearing the shenanigans of billionaires.

[-] doeknius_gloek@feddit.de 125 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The interesting part about this story isn't Altman himself. It's more about the weird decisions and inner politics of a $90bn company. A board firing their ceo without official reasoning, MS sweeping in while owning 49% of said company, 95% of the staff threatening to quit and the ceo coming back and firing the board while everybody else still tries to understand what the fuck just happened.

Like another commenter said, this could straight up be an episode of Silicon Valley.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 52 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And at the end of the day what it really boils down to is that ethics in tech is a PR byline, and the money will always win within the system that exists

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 52 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, it's actually pathetic how many people immediately sided with this clown too. Dude is another generic salesman type CEO who commercialized what was supposed to be open source software and lobbied the EU for loose regulations in AI, yet people act like it's bad thing that they dumped him.

Just proves to me that most people involved in tech are greedy scumbags, from the top all the way down.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

While everyone was jerking themselves raw about this stuff a year ago, Tycho at Penny Arcade (yeah, remember them?) nailed it and it's been sitting in my head ever since:

Ultimately, the technology is not my concern. It is that there's another Industrial Revolution happening, right now, you can play with it like a toy, and it will be very surprising to me if it results in a greater bargaining position for the worker. That's just not how it goes.

Some portion of the conversation always has the sting of betrayal in it. But you like computer stuff! Yeah, I like computer stuff. Except we aren't talking about computer stuff. We're talking about people stuff. People are messy. I work with a lot of creative people, and I have also had the pleasure - firmly installed in quotes - of working with the kind of people who call those people "creatives." We were at a meeting once where the person who will be advocating and using these technologies in your organization told us they hated creatives to our face. These technologies will displace workers and slash pay. That's… I mean, that's it.

https://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2022/12/26/sockrates

From the start of this AI boom, I've been saying, again and again, that regardless of the technology itself, the truly despicable thing about this are the people. Take all your idealistic futurist nonsense and "passion" for pushing the limits of technology and blow it out your ass, because this technology has one primary use case that was obvious from the word go, and every single one of these fuckers knew what that was when they started making it. For years they have worked to make a tool for corporations to steal the work from the working class, weaponize it against them, and enrich themselves in the process. They can all get fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I think people siding with him because they heard fuck all from the actual board.

If the board came out strong with a "our mission isn't to productize chat bots, but to research and develop AGI in an open, ethical, transparent way. Altman, as CEO, was undermining our mission by putting the emphasis on profit. These decisions by Sam weren't communicated to the board. We the board agreed that, while this may be surprising and disappointing to some, the best long term course of action is to part ways with Sam. We wish him all the best in his future endeavors and we look forward to fulfilling our mission in a responsible, open way".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lickmygiggle@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

Would you like to hear about my week? I'm a thousandaire.

[-] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is such a confusing and messy situation. There is definitely more going on that we dont know about. I already posted this in another thread but:

heres what I think could be going on:

tinfoil hat on

Some Microsoft bigwigs read the OpenAI foundation contract again and realise that they gave them a bunch of money but didnt get the nonprofit, and that they are now fully dependant on them, and that Altman is an experienced shark that knows this. They cant just buy the non-profit, the board would never agree. So they hatch a plan.

They get the lead researcher and a bunch of board members riled up against Altman, with a bunch of dirt they have on him. They tell them hes going to run off with the money and show some proof. The board decides to fire Altman. In the same breath but in another room microsoft hires altman, and promise all openAI employees employment at their new openAI bootleg. They then tell the board through the official channels, that they fucked up and need to resign.

Now, the situation was like this:

  • Either the board resigns, and microsoft gets to put some puppets in their place and complete buying openAI
  • The board doesnt resign, microsoft gets all their employees and the company in anything but name and openAI slowly fades in relevancy until Microsoft makes a generous offer of 150% above what they are worth(half of their price right now)

either way, microsoft wins.

so yeah, I think the next thing we are going to see is microsoft buying more openAI and getting actual control, or a complete buy.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

Sadly, I think you're absolutely right. This feels orchestrated in a way that allows a select few parties to look like visionaries, while eliminating others from getting in the way.

[-] 7112@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Sadly all that crazy seems totally possible with Microsoft involved.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Well yeah, Microsoft is very much in bed with OpenAI. It's not a huge mystery to see how this is going to play out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 76 points 7 months ago

What in the shit is going on. Goddamn. This has been a wild fucking weekend.

[-] Jagermo@feddit.de 44 points 7 months ago

Like an episode of Silicon Valley

[-] Tanoh@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago

For every year that passes Silicon Valley slides further and further from comedy to documentary.

[-] vulgarcynic@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 60 points 7 months ago

I had never even heard of this guy until like 4 days ago. Now I have to wonder if he can turn water into wine and raise the dead because everyone’s losing their shit over him.

[-] PeWu@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago

For fucking real. It's like he's God himself, because everyone want him, nevermind the consequences.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago

I have to believe it's mostly hype. The man was at the helm when OpenAI suddenly "changed the world" with "AI" (note the quotes) but that seems to be almost entirely a case of luck.

Like, generative AI models aren't really brand new. OpenAI just made them really accessible and easy to use for other applications, which is where Altman comes in. He had an ounce of foresight to see the tech was "the future" and a whole lot of luck executing on his plan to bring it to market.

As a figurehead and leader, that does count for a lot, but not the table-flipping freak outs we see happening.

[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

There are a lot of LLMs. None hold a candle to OpenAI's models still.

This will change in time, but right now OpenAI is still in front

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think its mostly popcorn at this point. The general opinion as I've noticed is that OpenAI is severely failing at living up to what it promised. Nobody particularly gives a shit about the board or Altman except some folks that seem fixated about the honestly unhinged postings of his sister.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] MurdoMaclachlan@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

Somehow, Altman returned.

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

I'm still wondering why he was even fired in the first place. I'd thought that perhaps I just hadn't paid proper enough attention and missed the reason, but nope, no reason was ever given.

[-] aard@kyu.de 57 points 7 months ago

There were some rumours that he was pushing the commercial side too fast, potentially ignoring ethical issues. Given Altmans lobbying against AI regulation in the EU I find that plausible.

Since now apparently the investors won it proves that the special structure of for-profit owned by non-profit intended to keep them honest does not work - and we urgently need to have regulation in place, as self-regulation does not work.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] soupcat@sopuli.xyz 13 points 7 months ago

I read something about him not being honest with the board, or keeping things from them? Didn't see any elaboration, though.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 7 months ago

That's all they have said as well.

We fired the guy for a reason, it was a good reason honest, no we're not going to tell you what it was. Anyway we've hired him back now so it's fine, stop asking questions.

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

They have been asked to provide that by the media, the first temporary CEO they named, and their investors, some of which even threatened to sue of they didn't disclose it. So either it is something so discriminating to the board they're willing to rather sink with it, or they actually don't have anything solid at all and fired him without cause bue to something personal/unprofessional.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PlexSheep@feddit.de 21 points 7 months ago

ClosedAI has completely fallen to capitalism as it seems.

[-] But_Class_War@midwest.social 13 points 7 months ago

Was is ever not completely under capitalism? As far as I've seen they were always fully going with hype over substance posturing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IrrerPolterer@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait, just so I get this right... The board fired him; Then members of the board wanted him back; Now he's back and replaced the board too? - so did he pull an uno reverse on the board of directors or what? How the fuck does that shit work?

[-] PeachMan@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

The entire company (literally almost all the employees) threatened to quit and take jobs at Microsoft if he wasn't reinstated and the board removed. And that's exactly what has happened.

I don't really have an opinion on this Sam guy or why his employees want to drink his bathwater, but it's an interesting example of the employees of a company unifying behind somebody.

[-] IrrerPolterer@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

It's rediculous though.. This guy is a sociopath

[-] Decoy321@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I haven't seen that take yet, got any links?

I'm not trying to defend the guy, just actually curious

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

He's a financial venture capitalist type who made open AI closed source, and tried to pressure the EU into not regulating.

He's your typical shitbag tech CEO masquerading as a genius. Employees want him back because it's better for their RSUs/stock options. Bunch of greedy assholes from top to bottom.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Have you heard of that creepy orb thing that was installed in a bunch of African developing countries that traded a shitcoin cryptocurrency that is worth nothing and constantly loses more and more value, in exchange for appropriating people's biometric data, that additionally has never said why they want it or what they want to do with all of that information?

That's this guy. He's the creator and owner of that thing. Dude is a comic supervillain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] archomrade@midwest.social 19 points 7 months ago

So many people here are eager to determine who the money-grubbers are, but here I am just curious what the material disagreement actually is, and how MSFT fits into it.

Seems to me like the board of directors and leadership are mostly aligned on the underlying goals, but disagree on how to approach achieving them.

[-] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

They're all money grubbers. The board are part of a rationalist cult called Effective Altruism that claims to want to save humanity, but they believe they need lots of money to do this (Sam Bankman-fried is an EA guy.)

Sam Altman is also nominally part of this group, but also hangs out with people like musk and Rishi Sunak. He's more like your typical alt-right tech bro.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 months ago

I would like to know who were the ones that got the money from this.

[-] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I'm not convinced this wasn't a planned strategy to get OpenAI back in the headlines for a week.

I didn't think so at first but now that it looks like everything will go back to "normal" before the US Thanksgiving Weekend, I feel like maybe this was a "Chinese Firedrill" to get attention for something other than their training data and legal problems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

So why about the board then? These people seem like idiots.

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 32 points 7 months ago

From the first sentence of the article:

Sam Altman will return as CEO of OpenAI with a new board

[-] Bjornir@programming.dev 7 points 7 months ago

Proof n°1093866 that being rich has nothing to do with being smart.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Being rich has everything to do with being lucky and evil.

[-] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are there some (paid or not, doesn’t matter) great alternatives to OpenAI based solutions like ChatGPT 4 and Copilot?

[-] isildun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 months ago

Copilot, yes. You can find some reasonable alternatives out there but I don't know if I would use the word "great".

GPT-4... not really. Unless you've got serious technical knowledge, serious hardware, and lots of time to experiment you're not going to find anything even remotely close to GPT-4. Probably the best the "average" person can do is run quantized Llama-2 on an M1 (or better) Macbook making use of the unified memory. Lack of GPU VRAM makes running even the "basic" models a challenge. And, for the record, this will still perform substantially worse than GPT-4.

If you're willing to pony up, you can get some hardware on the usual cloud providers but it will not be cheap and it will still require some serious effort since you're basically going to have to fine-tune your own LLM to get anywhere in the same ballpark as GPT-4.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

The new board screams "for the benefit of humanity" /s

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
381 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

55610 readers
2343 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS