this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
281 points (99.3% liked)

politics

27045 readers
2790 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The enhanced subsidies for people who buy their health insurance through exchanges established by the Affordable Care Act have officially expired, and Democratic lawmakers are ready to make sure voters know whom to blame going into the midterm elections.

Politico reported Friday that while Democrats in Congress are still pushing their Republican colleagues to allow a vote on renewing the enhanced subsidies, they have mostly settled on a political strategy of going scorched-earth on the GOP for letting them expire in the first place.

Rep. Ami Bera (D-Calif.) told Politico that Americans who see their monthly premiums skyrocket in the wake of the subsidies' expiration will take out their anger on the GOP.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully, there'll be some decent candidates and not just more of the same "centrists" who just pocket money from AIPAC and other big donors.

"Not the GOP" is not going to cut it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah except what if we just try to shame everybody into voting for a centrist candidate they aren't inspired by at all?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

How about before we get to that point you pick a candidate you DO support and boost them so they BECOME the candidate instead of passively waiting for whoever floats to the top of the bog?

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Now is the time! Not later this year. Not 6 days before the election. Right god damned now. Right up until the candidate is chosen. Then it'll be time again the fucking second the election is over.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

So do something, right god damned now, and practise as you preach. Use your comment to namedrop your pick and why they’re your pick.

I’m just acting on your username and basing this info on Texas. It’s not my state, not even my country, but it takes minutes to find out that Jasmine Crockett and James Talarico are running for the Democratic senator candidate, that Crockett is an AIPAC shill who has rejected the label “progressive” and Talarico is pro-healthcare reform and critical of Israel and Christian nationalism. I’m sure with a few more minutes you could find their voting records, just like I can for my local representatives in my country.

Who is the person that you want as your candidate in March and why?

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's a fair call out! I talked shit and didn't back it up.

It's no contest. Talarico is the more progressive of the two. I'm glad Allred dropped out because he's milquetoast. Crockett is proud of being a corporate Democrat. Talarico has called what Israel is doing atrocities and war crimes. He's headed in the correct direction on healthcare even if I disagree on the nuances. He's vocal about the billionaire donor issue. My biggest beef is how much of his platform is based on being a Christian, but that's a strength here whether I like it or not. And to be fair he calls out the people using the religion to be racist jackasses so, unlike a lot of the cowards, he is trying to clean house.

If Crockett is the nominee I'll vote for her. But unless and until then Talarico gets my money, attention, and time.

[–] WilloftheWest@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’m sorry that yours happened to be the comment I jumped on. In fact I’ve been ruminating on this sentiment for a while now. I think that voters on the left in general, myself included, need a fundamental shift in our voting mentality and how we prioritise events in the election cycle.

The battle for us is making sure that a desirable candidate is on the ballot paper on November 3rd. In that respect, the big midterm election for us is March 3rd. We need to be rounding up and riling up as many left wing voters as possible in time for March 3rd so that the choice in November isn’t between political apathy and a status quo corporate democrat.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Don't be sorry buddy. You're not wrong. I'd much rather someone be brusk and call me out correctly than polite and poisonous or doomer who insists that everything will always suck no matter what and try to turn us all against each other with purity tests.

Consider me properly and fairly called out. And consider me on your side.

Primary turnout is 20-30% generally. You want more progressive candidates? Encourage them and then go vote for them in primaries. Bring friends.

It's what mamdani did and it worked.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'll believe it when I see it, but the standard is for Dems to do jack shit.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

They'll hem and haw and clutch their pearls cause they don't want to be too offensive.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're talking about the elected officials, the sticks seems to be referring to voters

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

I'll believe that when I see it, too.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

They will send a sternly worded letter and do nothing else

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

And don't forget the possibility of a new government shutdown on Jan 30th. That'll be fun.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dems will shut it down just long enough to hurt people, but as soon as the airports become affected, and corporations can't move their operatives around the country, they'll fold.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Big difference this time is that holiday time is over. I'm not so sure the corpos care a whole lot about keeping the airlines available for Valentine's Day.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Exactly the point. If it was the MAGAs at war, they would happily leave the airports closed over the Holidays, and try to blame Dems for it.

But reverse it, and the Dems will only fight until it gets inconvenient for the wealthy, them fold over nothing, and take the blame themselves.

MEDIOCRE!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Don't worry, the Republicans agreed to discuss health care this time.

Honestly wondering if the dems did something politically smart here.

They actually let the cuts go in place which means the morons finally feel the pain and everyone already rightly blames Republicans for that. Maybe they'll actually get a win here for the people.

Fanciful thinking but I choose to hope.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I figured the reason they caved in was that party leaders knew it would fuel midterms to make people suffer, but they themselves didn't want to look that way so they had safe seats to be the fall guys. So yeah, duh.

Pretty sure people here can see the writing on the wall and will at least vote in the primary. Not sure what good it'll do since tactics like that work way too well on average voters, but might as well try.

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

That's what pisses me off about a lot of Democrat politicians. It feels like they don't see Trump as an enemy so much as a punishment for the voters for not voting for them. No concern, no hard action, just saying "look what you've done. Ready to go back to normal now?"

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Yup! Return to normal was such a dumb rallying cry for Biden. I was rather vocal about that to people I knew during the 2020 primary but by the time my state got to vote, he was pretty much the candidate.

[–] velindora@lemmy.cafe 8 points 6 days ago

HAVE THE DAY YOU VOTED FOR

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

It's primary season!

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nasty worded letters? Shaking fists?

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 3 points 6 days ago

Definitely those too, they can be done simultaneously

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Their messaging is usually terrible and so off-putting to so many of the low-info and the normies.

Watch for the Dems to step on some stupid rake like bathroom bills, men in women's sports, BLM, "antifa", defund the police, etc. it almost seems inevitable that even when the most obvious narrative is right there for them to set up the framing, they let the fucking corporate media and the fascists do all the framing.

They have no real media. Of course it's framed by corporate media.