this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
24 points (77.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1662 readers
150 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess it's tradition to post here. Some random comment somewhere netted these community and instance bans. Whoever did that doesn't like communists

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It seems like this is the genesis. As I'm reading it, people were trying to lecture you on things you felt you were already informed on, so you responded by being unengaged and dismissive.

Its a little rude but not reactionary.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

oh yes there was the unsolicited lecturing and rudeness. didn't mind it much

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

I'm inclined to believe OP failed a tankie purity test or sometimes similar.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lemmygrad is not for everyone. In fact, it is a heavily insulated corner of the Fediverse. If you do not belong, then you lost nothing by being made unwelcome. Many instances are not federated with Lemmygrad, and I am surprised slightly that federation is even maintained with Lemmy.zip.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah I know, I just don't investigate which instance it happens to be on when there's a commentable thing on the feed. But it's a funny thing to get so worked up with the little bans when nothing was antagonistic towards them.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Instances do have their own character. Such differences are an intentional and favorable feature of the Fediverse, but also demand a basic level of consideration, for effective navigation.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Don't you dare disagree with me, or I'll get really hostile and ban you" doesn't demand consideration or respect.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I mean its still their space, but its hard to disagree with you on that

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have no power to stop Lemmygrad from existing, and it is unlikely that I would find cause to advocate against its being allowed to continue existing, as long as it operates simply as a site for activity that many would recognize as protected freedoms of expression.

Additionally, I am using an instance that is not federated with Lemmygrad. As such, my experience in the Lemmyverse is just the same as though Lemmygrad did not exist, which I find quite optimal. LIkewise, Lemmygrad users would not be receptive to my politics, as much so as I am not agreeable to its politics.

Among the virtues of a federated design is that we may choose the experiences we prefer, against the inevitability that others will exist who prefer experiences quite different.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All of that, I agree with. It's fine. In the same way, I certainly believe that maga.place should be permitted to exist.

My point was that implicitly asking people to give "consideration" in the way that you did, is asking that some level of respect be granted to people who are giving none in return. It's the paradox of tolerance. It's okay to shun people who are making excuses and apologetics for literal mass murder, even to laugh at them for balling up their fists and shutting their eyes tight, and insisting that you are the one who is jingoistic, hostile, counterfactual, unreasonable, and all that, if you aren't fans of the same mass murderers they are.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

I meant "consideration" in the sense of reaching decisions based on awareness.

I think you simply misinterpreted my phrasing.

I know some apps tryto obscure that shit by default and I hate that so much.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lemmy.zip is one of those no-defed instances so it's not that surprising that they continue to be federated even with instances which exist to spread hate and propaganda.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

It seems like a misguided policy, and not particularly consistent with the "Code of Conduct".

Much of the value of the federated design is lost without the threat of defederation to incentivize good behavior and to isolate bad behavior.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you don't know what led to the ban?

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Probably something "super controversial" that got downvoted here

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Another poor pure soul was oppressed by the communistic regime. Sad.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More like another communist was oppressed

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Valid point, but I would rather say some communists, not just one, especially assuming how fragile their ego is sometimes.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought I was the oppressed communist

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It says right there in the modlog that you're an anti-communist troll, actually

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

It says in the post headline that yet again the accusation is a confession