this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
221 points (99.1% liked)

News

36966 readers
1774 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia on Monday accused Ukraine of trying to attack President Vladimir Putin’s residence in northern Russia, which President Trump said he was “very angry” about, even as Kyiv has denied it happened.

The Kremlin’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow’s negotiating position to end its war in Ukraine was under review after it claimed Kyiv tried to attack the presidential residence in the Novgorod region overnight with 91 long-range drones. Lavrov said all drones were destroyed by Russian air defenses, with no injuries or damage.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, meanwhile, said Russia’s claims were “a complete fabrication intended to justify additional attacks against Ukraine” and undermine peace talks, according to a post to the social platform X.

But Trump later on Monday appeared to take Russia’s side.

“I don’t like it, it’s not good. I heard about it this morning. You know who told me about it? President Putin told me about it. Early in the morning he said he was attacked. That’s no good, it’s no good,” Trump told reporters at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Fla., of the claimed strike.

“It’s a delicate period of time. This is not the right time,” Trump added, likely referring to ongoing peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. “It’s one thing to be offensive, because [Russia is] offensive, it’s another thing to attack [Putin’s] house. It’s not the right time to do any of that. … I was very angry about it.”

Asked if there’s evidence of the attack, Trump replied: “Well, we’ll find out. You’re saying maybe the attack didn’t take place? That’s possible, I guess, but President Putin told me this morning.”

Asked if there’s evidence of the attack, Trump replied: “Well, we’ll find out. You’re saying maybe the attack didn’t take place? That’s possible, I guess, but President Putin told me this morning.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Trump’s call with Putin, saying in a post on X that the president had “concluded a positive call with President Putin concerning Ukraine.”

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) later criticized Trump for appearing to side with Russia, accusing Putin of frequently lying.

“President Trump and his team should get the facts first before assuming blame. Putin is a well known boldface liar,” Bacon wrote on X.

Russia has already promised to retaliate against Ukraine and said targets had already been selected for such strikes.

“Such reckless actions will not go unanswered. The targets for retaliatory strikes and the timing of their implementation by the Russian armed forces have been determined,” Lavrov said.

Zelensky in his post warned that Russia would use the alleged attack to justify strikes against Ukraine, including government buildings in Kyiv.

“Russia is at it again, using dangerous statements to undermine all achievements of our shared diplomatic efforts with President Trump’s team. We keep working together to bring peace closer,” he wrote.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 88 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh noooo. How many assassination attempts have been made against Zelensky? I remember at least 3.

This is the bully screaming for the teacher because the bullied dared to swing back.

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So.....Donald is just default going with Putin on most of this? How is he even still in office???? Dumb question, I know

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

That's who he last talked to, so of course. Next time he talks to Zelensky it will be about what Ukraine wants.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Seriously, even if they had done it, Trump should have responded well no shit, you invaded their country and tried to take it. Don't be a little wuss about the consequences. If they slit your throat in your sleep, that's your fault. Want them to not; and us to care, remove all your troops from Ukraine and pay reperations.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why. The. Fuck. Would attacking the person who is directly leading the invasion of his country be considered off-limits? There should be no reason the person at the head of a country should be considered off limits when the two countries are at war.

The only reason that Trump wants Putin to be off limits is that it means if Trump starts a war, he doesn't want to be considered a valid military target.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They want this to be a debate about whether it happened or not. I think it may be wise to turn it into a debate on whether it should matter, as you’ve pointed out. Let this be a fuckup that normalizes more danger for Putin.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 42 points 3 months ago

If Trump said it happened, that's strong evidence that it didn't.

Trump taking Putin's side? No way!

[–] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 months ago

Wow guys, seriously, let's be civil here, attacking the aggressor leader during a war? That's just not polite, clearly.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Fucksake, why wouldn't they attack Putin persona lly? The bastard invaded their homeland.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 17 points 3 months ago

Imagine being such an immense pussy that you start a full blown war and complain that your opps attacked one of your houses...

[–] sandwich@piefed.social 15 points 3 months ago

I can’t believe Trump sided with Putin! /s

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And why the fuck wouldn't they do it? Of course they would. Does anybody believe Russia wouldn't target Zelensky? It's not the 18th century anymore, it's no longer "dishonourable" to shoot officers and of fucking course you try to cut off the head of the snake if you can. What the fuck?!

[–] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

They did target Zelensky, right at the start. The special forces were surrounding the compound he was in.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/29/russian-forces-reportedly-came-close-to-capturing-zelenskiy-during-first-hours-of-invasion

[–] Grogon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (21 children)

If people were normal they'd throw Putin, Kim, Winny Poo, Trump, Merz, ... basicall all politicians in a random arena and just add in a few tigers.

Does anyone actually even like their own "leaders"? I'm not even talking about Democrats at this point, throw them in the arena too.

Throw em all in, no matter party. They all corrupt. Throw the rich people in the arena too that dont give anything to charity at all and just bs stuff with the money.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Who cares. Swing away!

[–] MOARbid1@piefed.social 9 points 3 months ago

It seems like killing Putin should have been the first move. Why is everyone surprised he was allegedly targeted now?

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

That just means that it's definitely not true. It's generally safe to assume the opposite of anything Trump says.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

That picture of him blowing Bubba is Putin's most prized possession.

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

News? Putin's cock-holster is fellating Putin as usual.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

If Big Zaddy's crew could hit putins house, the fucker would already be dead.

Simple as that

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

OK? Shame it didn't work, but legitimate attack I'd say. Behead the snake, end the war.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nobody attacked Putin. You can't pretend to be the victim if you don't hide your war crimes behind a false flag

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 3 months ago

Now here's the scandal!

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 3 months ago

If they didn't do it before, now is a good time to do the deed anyway. They'll get blamed either way, so they might as well do it.

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

The residence of the opposite teams leader is a legitimate millitary target

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 5 points 3 months ago

Could have just shortened the title to 4 words...

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gotta side with the side you've been compromised by.

Dance with the one who brung ya

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
[–] lennee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

blow that fucker up

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Attack both next.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

It makes it angry, do it again. Fail a dozen times if you have to.

load more comments
view more: next ›