this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2025
387 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

78015 readers
3530 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Low-quality AI-generated content is now saturating social media – and generating about $117m a year, data shows

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Why it wouldn't be? You ask AI, you generate with AI, you replace humans with AI an you also watch AI.\ Wait till they change news anchors with AI.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 7 points 5 hours ago

Tell your favorite content creators to get over to Nebula. Or are there better options?

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I use freetube to kinda help deal with it but it is still a real issue. Even something like internet browser comparison videos are filed with AI voice overs and no real human input.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 hours ago

For YouTube, I've switched to Grayjay and I just subscribe to creators I like. I ignore the home feed.

This has removed AI slop, ads, and shorts, which is awesome, but I the tradeoff is jot having a useful recommendation feed. Its not as good as YouTube of old, but worlds better than YouTube of the last few years.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 46 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I’ve stopped watching YouTube shorts because of this, and the removal of the downvote count makes it harder to tell.

And hiding the date the video is from, Youtube is getting worse.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago

I will never pay for youtube while the downvote count is gone. Absolute anti consumer bullshit.

I do use the add-on to bring them back, but fuck those assholes for doing this.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Why would you ever watch shorts in the first place? First thing I did when they appeared was make a ublock filter to hide them.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 3 points 6 hours ago

100% this I do everything I can to ignore shorts

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Considering a lot of the full YouTube videos are full of padding, taking over ten minutes to get to the point, I can understand why the shorts would have appeal.

Problem is one way or another people are being incentivized to target a specific runtime regardless of whether they have the material to fit.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I just skip those. There's almost always a better one that was easy to find.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 hours ago

"Stay tuned for part 2"

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago

0 people liked the removal of the dislike button.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 69 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It’s probably going to get worse before it gets better. The YouTube algorithm favors low effort frequent posting, so AI slop is perfect for the platform.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 41 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Every algorithm is based around frequent posting and farming engagement. Everything is optimized to ruin the internet.

[–] qt0x40490FDB@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 hours ago

It’s almost as if there is a financial incentive to enshitify everything.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Not until we make our own video hosting site - with blackjack and hookers!

[–] Laser@feddit.org 8 points 9 hours ago

I mean peertube exists, and it actually integrates into the fediverse...

[–] saltnotsugar@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

In fact, let’s forget the video hosting site.

[–] DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz 20 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wait that means YouTube might be dying? Im actually mildly happy with that, maybe it ruins their Monopoly and opens the web for smaller niche platforms (not sure how they would survive AI but if they don't reward low effort high freq it might be something?)

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

For it to die there has to be an alternative for the content. I don't see anything that could replace it at the moment.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago
[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] blaue_Fledermaus@olio.cafe 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Peertube still needs improvements to start looking attractive.

While it is technically federated, using it still feels like it's just a bunch of small disjointed sites.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 6 points 8 hours ago

That's fair. I just hope mentioning and drawing more people to the platform helps (or provides incentive) for it to improve.and become a viable YouTube replacement. Or at least a supplement to something better than YouTube.

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world -5 points 11 hours ago

Rumble is getting there. If it can drop all the right wing bs it would be a decent platform. The gaming section is decent though

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Manosphere fanfic everywhere.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

2 years ago I went to youtube without logging into my account. The amount of right wing manosphere crap being recommended to new accounts was frightening. Within 5 minutes there was a video playing of how women should be subservient to men because their role is basically a house cleaning baby factory with no free will.

I genuinely think google should be sued the everliving shit out of them for allowing this crap to be pushed. They looked at what facebook did and went "Oh, that's great. Let's do that as well!"

[–] Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I just went there after years of avoidance because my kids are there are lot. I needed to see. They're not there anymore. Manosphere, I hate those different than me, racism, outright hatred. It's fucked.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't regularly use it, but I run into yt in search results every now and then. If I've looked, the front page and lots of recommends have always looked like cancer, I've never seen anything like that. Could it be a localized thing?

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

“Generating” $117m, or allocating ad revenue and watch hours to these videos? Because it sounds like businesses will pay for advertisements to see numbers go up, and if numbers go up then people think ads are working. This whole economy is stupid because unless the money is coming from a consumer then it’s false. If the only thing being consumed is content, the ads are simply a hurdle that people love to keep throwing in the way and propping up this shit content. At some point market economics needs to win and balance things out and advertisers need to check their ROI, but that will never happen because new metrics will be made to justify the marketing teams or 3rd party consultants these companies are paying to put out these ads.

If there was a filter for “unmonetised” this house of cards would fall on its ass. Real people uploading real content to share for real consumers to enjoy and view.

[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 6 points 13 hours ago

Horrendous amounts of BS on X, Facebook, Insta, TikTok, etc. Applies to ' news ', images and videos.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

So what percent is AI?