this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
431 points (99.1% liked)

News

33791 readers
3426 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An Oklahoma man who was doing target practice in his backyard on Christmas is believed to have shot and killed an elderly woman a few blocks from his home, authorities said.

Cody Wayne Adams, 33, has been charged with first-degree manslaughter in connection with the deadly shooting, court filings show.

The victim was on a covered front porch with family members at a residence in Comanche when she was shot Thursday afternoon, according to the probable cause affidavit. She was holding a baby in her left arm while seated on a love seat when she was struck in her right upper arm, according to the affidavit. The bullet then entered her chest cavity, it said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The dumbfuck Adams is one of many reasons why the USA needs stricter gun control. I wonder if the worthless POS is a Charlie Kirk supporter.

[–] Cloudstash@lemmy.world 27 points 12 hours ago

"I'm a responsible gun owner, i have owned guns since the dawn of light" - Proceeds to 360 no-scope the neighbor.

Well, no, the average gun owner in USA is not a responsible gun owner.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

There’s a bullet hole in the flashing under my second floor gutters, facing the street. Doesn’t look like it came from nearby, like it’s not slanted down toward the street or anything. No idea how long it’s been there, but I found it a few years ago when cleaning the gutters. Bullet might still be lodged in there.

It’s genuinely wild to me that people just fire this shit off willy-nilly.

[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Coworker of mine was shot through her apartment floor (accidental discharge). She almost died.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 29 points 16 hours ago

My wife worked with someone that didn't know that bullets come down after you shoot them in the air. People are fucking stupid.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 15 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

While in military school after boot camp, I was stuck in the barracks because our Chief was extremely strict about letting us use our evening time how we’d like. While mopping the same spot for the 4th hour, I get a call from my wife advising that she’s really scared. A gun had just discharged from the neighbors house, went through our wall, got lodged in our dresser about 2” from my 1.5 year old daughter’s leg. I went to my chief and other instructors, asking to be let out so I can comfort my family. They said no, there’s nothing I can do if I leave and my family can drive to a motel if they feel unsafe.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You’re expecting military people not to be insane about guns?

[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago

Honestly, I know you're making a joke but I habe 17 years in Enlisted and if a troop came to me with this story and said "My family is scared" Id be like "Yeah that makes sense go the fuck home".

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 21 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

It’s genuinely wild to me that Americans let just anyone have the capability to do that.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I agree, frankly. I am expert qualified (former military), and inherited firearms when my mom died. I don’t have any firearms currently, as I sold those off (very very old farm weapons; we were on a farmette) nor do I ever intend to get more. All that training, and I’m still not comfortable owning something that is designed specifically to kill something.

That is to say you can hypothetically do nothing, and still end up with firearms, which is a really big problem. Zero background check on inheritance..

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 53 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Yup, that's why if you're going to practice, do so on a range and always consider: what the hell is BEHIND/AROUND my target?

JFC for a nation as obsessed with firearms as the United States, the level of firearms safety knowledge is shockingly low.

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

People in my neck of the woods talk about fire arms the way I talk about video games or TV shows. They sound like recreation rather than self defense. I don’t know if knowledge is the only factor; a sense of seriousness about firearms seems to be lacking.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

To be fair if guns were legal in my area I'd totally have one for fun. They look like a ton of fun. Probably best I'm not allowed one

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

In civilized parts of the world, it is illegal to discharge a firearm in an urban area or within X metres of an occupied building etc.

In the USA people shoot in their suburban backyard.

[–] Faildini@lemmy.world 31 points 16 hours ago

For what it's worth, it's illegal in the USA too. Obviously that didn't stop this moron.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Well there’s the problem: Americans don’t understand meters.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

I can't think of a place I've lived where discharge of firearms within city limits was not illegal. This moron probably didn't care.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 73 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If only that baby were armed, it could have returned fire and everything would have been okay. More guns is the solution!

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 20 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

It’s insane to me how many people think that taking guns away will actually increase the violence.. like the people that would normally shoot up a place would suddenly become experts at building bombs and take out WAY more people.. when the reality is that those people would probably be more likely to blow themselves up trying to build a bomb.. guns are so simple to kill with, a toddler could do it. Building a bomb or something equivalent is much harder than pulling a trigger.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 minutes ago

Name and shame em

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If the polive was actually useful, then maybe getting rid of guns could be a good thing.

But as an Asian American. I know about the Korean Americans during LA Riots who had to protect their stores by themselves because the authorities didn't give a shit.

Asian Diaspora are one of the most vulnerable groups. Because a lot of us have successful bussinesses and racists are jealous and like to target us.

So I'd prefer well regulated militias than police. Especially in the context of America where cops are horrible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 142 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Just gonna politely point out that America is living under extreme corruption and tyranny right now, and the 2nd amendment aint doing shit to help with that problem. Sure gets of innocent citizens killed, though.

Just like any expected conflict ever, the 2nd amendment caused an arms race - and the govt is far, far more heavily armed than the people.

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 4 points 14 hours ago

The common modern interpretation of the 2nd amendment being that gun sales and ownership must be almost completely unregulated is bullshit and not at all the way it was intended to be interpreted. It was supposed to protect the right of people to form and maintain local militias independent from the federal government, hence the "well-regulated militia" wording. The idea was that if local governments maintained their own militias consisting of private citizens it would create a collective military force capable of keeping the federal army in check. The modern emphasis on individual gun ownership with no organization has clearly not served this purpose.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And here I am at 42 considering a pistol for the first time, to protect against other crazy citizens.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Statistically speaking, buying that handgun is going to dramatically increase your odds of dying by firearm.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

Buying a gun does make you more suicidal, as we can see the rise in suicides after buying a gun

[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago

Not sure who’s downvoting this but the claim is verifiable.

Here’s a John Hopkins report from 2023: https://publichealth.jhu.edu/center-for-gun-violence-solutions/data/annual-gun-violence-data

What I think is the most interesting, and a fact I learned taking a firearms safety course here in Canada, is that the highest risk remains suicide.

From the report: Gun suicides have accounted for the majority of all gun deaths each year since 1995.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I know, probably partly because if you intend to use it, you're more likely to get shot instead, or shoot yourself.That's why it's only a consideration, but also, domestic tensions are...less than ideal.

But I have no kids, I'd take lessons and practice first, and I'd never leave ammo loaded. I do not want a gun in my home. I'm fine keeping them animated and fired with a gamepad.

And I'd like to think in the very unlikely situation I'd need it, I wouldn't, like, engage, like an idiot.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›