this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
369 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26827 readers
2370 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Washington Post editorial predictably ignores research showing that a single-payer system would save hundreds of billions of dollars—and tens of thousands of lives—each year.

An editorial published on Christmas by the Jeff Bezos-owned Washington Post inveighed against supporters of Medicare for All in the United States, pointing to the struggles of Britain’s chronically underfunded National Health Service as a “cautionary tale” while ignoring research showing that a single-payer system would save the US hundreds of billions of dollars and tens of thousands of lives each year.

The editorial, headlined "Socialized medicine can't survive the winter," laments the "religious-like devotion to the NHS" in the United Kingdom even as "hospital corridors overflow and routine procedures get canceled due to a catastrophic event commonly known as 'winter.'"

The Post editorial board, led by opinion editor Adam O’Neal, waves away expert analyses showing that the UK government is underinvesting in its healthcare system relative to other countries in Europe, resulting in the kinds of problems the Thursday editorial attributed to the supposedly inherent flaws of single-payer systems.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

When a hot dog sign makes so much sense

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I need to know that you know that that's a Dickens line. It's from A Christmas Carol.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know Dickens owned a hot dog store

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

I'm only familiar with his cider.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Ew, no. They must be absolutely full of preservatives? Head on a spike in a prominent public place is my preference.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 28 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Conservatives in Britain and Canada continually underfund their national health Care service with the goal of eventually eliminating it. Then conservatives in the United States point at the British healthcare service in say, "Look at that, see it doesn't work."

This is literally been the case for the last 30+ years.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Underfunding government services so they break and then using that brokenness as a reason to cut funding further has been the Republican MO for decades.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 hours ago

Republican MO

*Conservative and neoliberal MO

[–] trk@aussie.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

Starving the beast

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

That's the case in Portugal too, but both of the two largest parties have been cutting it for years.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh yeah the so-called liberals are totally complicit in this farce. All they do is wave their hands and say "this is terrible" and do literally nothing to stop it.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Shocker! Rich person who can afford anything they want thinks the poors don't deserve a healthy life. Can't work the slave pits if I can't lift 5 lbs boss.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 hours ago

Whos also doing pharmacy and health insurance

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 71 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

One more wedge to drive between us.

"Don't you just hate all those people sponging off our Government?!"

No. I don't hate them, I envy them.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Where are these fabled people?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 27 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

How awful would it be if we made the billionaires pay for everyone’s healthcare.

And we have the power to make it happen; that’s their biggest fear. But do we have the will? They will do whatever they can to divide us so we don’t obtain the will.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 37 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Chronically underfunded by the Tories in order to make getting rid of it more palatable.

The only thing the UK believes in is the NHS. It is our religion.

[–] sauerkrautsaul@lemmus.org 3 points 7 hours ago

stephen fry is pretty popular

[–] qt0x40490FDB@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 hours ago

I loved the NHS while I was over there. I got health care SO MUCH BETTER than in the US. And it was way more continent and less stressful. And, assuming that the “entry fee” I paid when I got my visa wasn’t subsidized, cheeper too.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sheesh! Single payer and proper sick leave is good for business!

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Not the bezos brand of business

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Well duh! Everyone knows the weak should be allowed to die from curable conditions. And no public schools either. That way, the billionaires will have a fit, obedient work force.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

imagine having the shittiest healthcare among top developed countries and thinking it's the best. and also thinking it's better to pay insurance premiums, copays, deductibles, and constantly fighting insurance over your meds all of a sudden being "not medically necessary,"... instead of a higher tax bill that covers everything

america is so fucking stupid

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 12 points 11 hours ago

The NHS is chronically underfunded, because every successive UK government is determined to make the NHS do more with less - and at some point something has to give, which is why service declines every winter despite it being the same story every year, because the money isn't there to prevent it

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Knowing Bezos not surprising to me.