this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
332 points (99.4% liked)

News

36966 readers
2205 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk’s brand sold 12,130 new cars across the EU last month, down from 18,430 in November 2024

Tesla continued a run of weak sales in the EU in November, with new car registrations of Elon Musk’s brand down a third, while Chinese carmakers’ sales soared.

Tesla sold 12,130 new cars across the EU last month, down from 18,430 in November 2024, shrinking its market share from 2.1% to 1.4%, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association (Acea), a lobby group.

The Chinese carmaker BYD recorded by far the fastest sales growth, with registrations across Europe almost tripling year on year up to November, to 42,500. Chinese state-owned SAIC, the owner of the MG brand, recorded sales increases of 26% to push sales to 217,000.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aarrodri@lemmy.ca 79 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My thoughts exactly

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 50 points 3 months ago (5 children)

I get why Americans might still buy them. But why the actual fuck would someone from the EU buy a Tesla now?

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't get why Americans would still buy them but then again I'm not a Nazi or pedo

[–] NullTheWolf@pawb.social 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I realize this isn't a real question but the US doesn't have access to the cheap Chinese cars

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago

The US has access to lots of cheap used EVs. What’s holding up American adoption isn’t cost, it is propaganda and charger access for renters.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They also don't have access to quality European cars without steep tariffs.
The US market is massively favoring American cars. Meaning they can only have shitty expensive American cars.
I just bought a used 4 year old VW ID.4 with 120.000 km (75.000 miles) on it, not a squeak to hear when I drive it. with Tesla they make noises already when delivered new from the factory!! At least the ones we get in Denmark do.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the US has very little choice in the EV space. Tesla is the cheapest and most technologically advanced. Anything else you buy here has some sort of compromise compared to the comparable Tesla product. I’d buy Renault if they weren’t banned here in the US.

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hyundai electric cars are better in every way, from what I've read

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

With the Ioniq/Ev6(3), their closest competition is the model y because it’s priced way above the model 3. The displays in the Korean EVs today are paltry and nowhere near as well considered as Tesla software. Tesla software is like using an iPhone, while everything else on the market is like using a flip phone. In the US, our available “Android” option is either Rivian or polestar (neither of which are in the model 3/y budget, nor as smooth and well considered as Tesla). There’s a reason why the model y was the most popular car on the planet until China started making cars with software to match. Here is the US, I would only buy an Ioniq/Ev6 if it were 20k because of how small the screen is and how bad the software is.

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 25 points 3 months ago

0% finance which most other car companies don't offer.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

Fleet buyers getting massive discounts probably

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I see Teslas on the road here in England, but seldom one that looks new. The new EVs I see are Kias, Renaults, MGs, and a small but growing number of BYDs. Once in a while you'll see a new Jaguar EV or Polestar.

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Not everybody reads the news or is online a lot.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Who is still buying from Elon at this point?

Also, why aren't we buying European or Japanese EVs? Where are they?

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

There are no competitive Japanese EVs. European EVs are basically only available as premium brands outside of Europe.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are no competitive Japanese EVs

Gonna have to agree there.

Years ago, I thought Toyota would pivot and become a forerunner in the EV revolution. They already put electric motors in their cars, they had hybrid versions of nearly everything they made a decade ago already!

Now it's been over a decade since Tesla made EVs an actual thing you could drive in the public's eyes... and the only electric Toyota that's not a van, that I can buy right now, is still the bZ4X which was kinda uninspiring when it came out.. let alone now.

At least earlier European electric cars (Volvo, BMW, Audi mostly) have started depreciating enough that they're in my ballpark now. I don't want to pay 30k EUR for a car that costs 30k EUR new, but I'll pay 30k EUR for a car that was 80k just 2-3 years ago. It's just one of my quirks, I want to get as much car as possible for as little money as possible, and to make up for it, I'll do my own repairs on formerly expensive, complex European automobiles.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Toyota went all in on hybrids and hydrogen. Which isn’t available outside of California.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are many advantages to hybrids over EVs, especially plug-in hybrids. In many scenarios PHEVs are not only more convenient/viable than EVs, they're cleaner than EVs over the vehicle's lifespan too. Think: shorter daily trips, mostly runs on electricity but with a smaller battery, in a scenario where electricity production comes from combustion.

For a majority of the world hybrids simply make way more sense, and that will continue to be the case for a decade at least. While I personally would prefer an EV for myself, I'm glad that Toyota is prioritising hybrids.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

There are some unfortunate facts to consider.

  1. PHEVs get nowhere near the claimed CO2 emissions because a lot of people simply don't charge them
  2. PHEVs that DO get used mostly as EVs can develop issues with the ICE not being used enough (cars are funny: parts that are supposed to move, wear when they move, but also don't like it when they don't get to move enough)
  3. Okay, cool, you like PHEVs. Toyota now finally has options for you on that front (They even lagged with that, at least here in Europe they had mostly non-plugin hybrids for the longest time), but what about the people who'd like to cut their emissions now rather than in 2040? Toyota offers them no viable solutions unless they want a BZ4X which is a boring box. Which is what Toyota has always done, but here's the thing: The boring Toyota box was always more reliable than the non-boring competition. With EVs this is no longer such a clear-cut case, as the most important bits get an 8 year warranty from nearly everyone, and there's no quad-turbo setup to go wrong on BMW EVs, no expensive timing chains on Audi EVs, etc. THe BZ4X doesn't really stand out in anything.
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Toyota made a huge mistake going all in on hybrid cars.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hybrids are not a bad transitional technology, and Toyota's hybrids are better than anyone else's. Their much bigger strategic mistake was sinking hundreds of millions into developing hydrogen-powered cars that nobody wanted, at the neglect of building up EV expertise.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

The problem with hydrogen isn't that no one wants the cars, it's that it fundamentally makes no sense.

And it never will.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I thought they gambled on the hydrogen car?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah they did, and lost their shirts.

[–] redplayer5@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not true. They had record sales on their hybrids.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

And still do. They're also about to release their solid state batteries, leapfrogging over lithium ion packs, which seems like the way to go considering people want more than 200-300 miles of range out of their vehicles.

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I see plenty of Nissan Leafs on the roads. Sweden, EU.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The leaf is uncompetitive in the US at least because it still uses chademo charging, which is really outdated and will disappear

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

SpaceX. No joke, Elon is just selling Cyber trucks to his other companies to pump up the sales numbers.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Nazis with money. That's who

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Marketing. With Tesla, you're buying a future and a promise, and anyone criticizes Tesla also wants that future to not happen.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That aren't skipping Teslas because of the car, they just don't want to do give Musk their money.

In a company with a LOT of problems, he is the company's biggest problem, by far, and as long as he helms the company, it will continue its slide. Ejecting him from all control of the company is the only chance that Tesla has to survive, although it is probably already too late.

With him, I predict that Tesla will be bankrupt within two years.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's 2035. Chinese EVs are still banned in the US market. The Trumpist regime still hasn't provided suitable alternative modes of transportation and the air is unbreathable. I have just snucked out of a San Diego harbor with a BYD electric hatchback. Life is good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago

Quick give Elon more money!