this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
356 points (99.4% liked)

196

5402 readers
1621 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 110 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just release the torrent jeez

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 93 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Torrents are for illegal stuff.

...oh, wait

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 77 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My 800TB of uploads for “Linux isos” beg to differ

[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

holy shit your ratio must be insane

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago

Funny thing is, i specifically have the client limited to 100kb/s, it's amazing what you can get by just letting it run in the background at all times.

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm looking through those and holy shit these images look like they're taken straight out of a horror game

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like investigative photos cast a very creepy "using a high powered flashlight to investigate a crime scene" vibe. Horror games with flashlights kinda got the vibe right, it seems.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I think it's all in the lighting. For a crime scene, you probably just want to get really bright light on everything the camera sees. That ends up making the shadows seem very harsh, and every other light source weak. There's probably some primal fear that if your eyes are adjusted to the light, you're vulnerable to creatures who are hiding in the shadows with their eyes adjusted to the dark.

[–] Darohan@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Who the fuck was the interior decorator? A murder clown?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What? Those are some pretty benign photos. Even the painting is hard to judge without knowing anything about who the other person is.

[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't think she is referring to what the pictures are of, but rather that the ambiance of the pictures invoke horror. Like the harsh lighting and camera angles make it seem like it could be from a horror game or movie. While they are just pictures of a house, they still feel strange.

[–] starkzarn@infosec.pub 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sort of liminal space vibes

[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Basically yeah

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Then consider the files not released yet. Where are the data of the offenders?

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some of the redactions elsewhere seem insensible, but I feel like Masseuses might be victims too, and that just seems like a list of names?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of them is basically guaranteed to be Virginia Giuffre. The fact that she does not even appear is an implicit broadcast that the DoJ is not being impartial on this, and is overtly biasing their handling at a very, very official level.

For those that had any semblance of doubt at this point, I mean, obviously.

That's possible. And yes, I think there's no doubt pretty much all parts of the administration are as far from impartial as they can get.

[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the flight logs of 1993 Donald Trump is mentioned twice.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah this has felt redacted

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If I download this am I on a list

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are worse ways to get an FBI buddy.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I got one by losing internal organs and in the process somehow pissing off a priest who was connected to a senator and decided to take a little petty vengeance.

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate it when that happens

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

right? you'd have thought i'd have learned my lesson the first time, but then i pissed off the son of a senator connected to a priest and got a second fbi guy. we should really go to lunch sometime and compare notes on each other.

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you had a nickel for everytime… you’d have ten cents which isn’t a lot but it’s weird it happened twice

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah. I like to think I'm special that I've got two fbi guys, but let's be honest I'm probably just aware of two, we've all got at least a team (of LLMs, hereafter LLaMas because those dipshits can't name anything for beancornen

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I should download it because I know I am on at least a few lists.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm curious; are you guys seeing this currently?

I've viewed this link half a dozen times in the last two hours and never once saw the rate limiting page, from Canada. I wonder if it's regional.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Same from Germany, no waiting line.

[–] stepan@lemmy.cafe 11 points 1 month ago

⁶🤷🏻‍♂️⁷

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'll commend them on good website design. Back when Obamacare first launched, government web sites were especially bad at handling high load. A website that knows it is under high load and knows how to queue requests to keep working is actually admirable, especially for the government. I guess DOGE didn't fully fuck over DOJ.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Social security website is inaccessible after like 6pm EST. They shutdown websites overnight. Wts is that about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Wait pages like this are nonsense. If the server has capacity to show you this it could just show you the content you are looking for. Its obvious artificial rate limiting.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 76 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

not really; that page is much simpler to process and upload than an entire pedophile archive

sharing anything over the internet takes resources, in this case a lot of them, and with government infrastructure they're sometimes far behind the modern day trends on purpose, for stability/reliability reasons.

[–] coffee_tacos@mander.xyz 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is also usually a load balancer in front of the actual application servers, so the page is probably being served by that instead

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

VPS with reverse proxy in front of a Raspberry Pi type shit.

[–] Cloaca@mtgzone.com 25 points 1 month ago

Also caching is a factor here. Search results in particular can be a nightmare since variations in spelling or query string parameters having a difference of a single character makes it different than what others previously searched.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 19 points 1 month ago

The other interesting thing is you only have 10 minutes when you get in to grab your stuff and go

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interestingly, if someone links you to one of the files directly, there is no wait or redirect to the wait page.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which means they have no actual issue with content delivery, else they would limit that too.

[–] TragicNotCute@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you might be overlooking human error in configuration.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 23 points 1 month ago

On a government site? Inconceivable.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Not nessissarially true, very likely the wait page is rendered from cached memory and does not require a ssd read to print whereas any actual files would. It is true that the web server does have to have capacity to show you this, but I'm pretty sure the limitation will be on the SSD side. (Read and write operations). Source 5 years webserver admin.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

You clearly have never worked on tech at real scale.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

The servers that serve the content are very often different servers from serving the web site.