this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
168 points (85.3% liked)

Men's Liberation

2236 readers
2 users here now

This community is first and foremost a feminist community for men and masc people, but it is also a place to talk about men’s issues with a particular focus on intersectionality.


Rules

Everybody is welcome, but this is primarily a space for men and masc people


Non-masculine perspectives are incredibly important in making sure that the lived experiences of others are present in discussions on masculinity, but please remember that this is a space to discuss issues pertaining to men and masc individuals. Be kind, open-minded, and take care that you aren't talking over men expressing their own lived experiences.



Be productive


Be proactive in forming a productive discussion. Constructive criticism of our community is fine, but if you mainly criticize feminism or other people's efforts to solve gender issues, your post/comment will be removed.

Keep the following guidelines in mind when posting:

  • Build upon the OP
  • Discuss concepts rather than semantics
  • No low effort comments
  • No personal attacks


Assume good faith


Do not call other submitters' personal experiences into question.



No bigotry


Slurs, hate speech, and negative stereotyping towards marginalized groups will not be tolerated.



No brigading


Do not participate if you have been linked to this discussion from elsewhere. Similarly, links to elsewhere on the threadiverse must promote constructive discussion of men’s issues.



Recommended Reading

Related Communities

!feminism@beehaw.org
!askmen@lemmy.world
!mensmentalhealth@lemmy.world


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I think a large part of the very real issues in hetero relationships do come from patriarchy. But there is now a life-style genre of gender grievance and content. Heteropessimism sells and there is engagement from women who are tired of men, men who are tired of women, and either who is tired of the discussion.

But it generates ad revenue.

The issues are very real, and we benefit from learning more and engaging with feminist theory and praxis. But at some point we have to stop engaging and meet people where they're at.

Like even if you engage with a lot of theory sharing a great deal of what you learned could be called "performative." Get out of the doom scrolling cycles and engage with women in your community.

[–] spaduf@slrpnk.net 87 points 1 week ago (6 children)

From the article:

Not the feminism aimed at merely—in the words of psychology professor Darby Saxbe—"emulating men and outcompeting them on the terrain they have constructed.” Not the feminism the late bell hooks called “trickle-down theory: the [flawed] assumption that having more women at the top of corporate hierarchies would make the work world better for all women, including women on the bottom.”

No, the feminism that fights for a society where everyone of all genders has more time and energy to care about people outside of work.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago

Reject Pop/Girlboss Feminism embrace Gender Liberation!

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Trickle-down feminism is an ingenius way to describe that whole subject ngl.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jaselle@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Cut away the fluff of the article, and what they're actually saying is: interact with your community and help out your friends more. I think this is good advice for women too, it would probably be good for me.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Couldn't agree more. I have very loose friendships with old high school buddies and we rarely hang out. My wife however is doing something with her friends 2-3 times per week, having "women only" retreats, calling them almost daily, buying them birthday gifts even if they live out of state, and so on. She's infinitely more connected to a community than I am and for some men I think it's a real challenge to put themselves out there and to try and build up that trust and dependence to a certain degree. Men like to think we're Batman: we want a bare minimum of relationships so they can't be used against us.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

I was going to say there are many flavors of feminism from basically communism to gloria stienman. The interact with your community and help everyone to do well is the type that jives with me. hull house style.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 29 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I'm not sure if this is intended as ragebait or you wanted to pull readers in but please for the love of god stop saying the cure for men's problems is feminism. Its the most performative male thing ever.

This guy does not get it. He will never reach the average man with his message. It is a similar to the redpill message but worded in a worse way and has tons of political baggage shoved in.

Its so reductive to say "just care" as if lonely men are going around having all these social interactions but the problem is that they aren't caring hard enough. Bro the problem is they are NOT having social interactions. Saying "you just need to talk with your partner about the division of house hold labour" or "have you considered watching over your friends children?" they dont have a partner, they dont have friends thats why they are lonely. "You just need more free time" free time won't do shit they have enough free time thats not the issue.

We’ve been told that anything outside of going to work or optimizing ourselves by lifting weights, sitting in ice baths, and pounding creatine isn’t worth much. That caring for others isn’t a “productive” or “efficient” use of our time. That someone else will always end up doing it. That we’re not supposed to do it because women are naturally, biologically designed for it and we’re not (which is untrue). That if we do it, we’re less valuable, like a woman, less of a man.

No we havent. No one has ever said this. I hate this stupid meme that men are raised as souless golems. Every man enjoys being around people and laughing. Everyman enjoys having a relationship. The problem isnt that they dont value it or "society has told them they can't". The problem is they not comfortable enough to put themselves out there and expose themselves to the social risk that comes with making friends or dating.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

because saying stupid crap like 'feminism is the answer' is easy. 'just follow these simple steps and your it will all be magically fixed!!'

fixing real social problems... are very very hard. and pointing out the legit real problems... and people don't want to do the work. the problems are decades in the making and deeply entrenched in the culture and the economy, and most people are totally allergic to the solutions.

amen for poitning out the sexist biases of these articles. men are not 'less than' by default. or 'less than' for not adhering to some social ideal that we must all be happy success machines. god forbid we just be average and content.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This reeks of the same type of stuff as "just get outside to cure your depression" or "have you tried just not thinking like that?" for mental health issues.

If someone could be reached by telling them "just reach out, its that simple", they weren't the ones we need to be reaching. For sure it'd help, and there may be some people this resonates to. If so, great for them. But we have a major problem with isolated men, and those usually aren't ones who this will be helpful for, any more than an article addressing the mental health crisis by saying "just try more" solves that problem.

I think we need to be reaching out, but IMO the focus isn't on using words that are incredibly loaded, particularly for those people we're trying to reach and connect with. Those of us who are doing better should be reaching out, like the author said, and making those connections, but that won't solve this loneliness crisis.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

like any social issue, reaching out isn't doing shit. you can't 'reach out' to the homeless really.

what you need to do is change the material conditions such that homelessness isn't an appealing option... you have to give people opportunity. and we are living in a society that is destroying opportunity and then shifting the blame back on individuals for being 'failures' for not somehow squeezing blood out of a stone.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's a struggle. I try to do this with my union hall. Try and get out there and make connections with people. It comes a little easier when you're thrusted into social interactions ,because of your children, as a parent.

It's so much easier to just disassociate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 week ago

You gotta find ways of disguising it though. Fuckers get allergic reactions to words that sound all pink coded and woke

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Using no true Scotsman type arguments to define gender equality is distractingly bonkers. Otherwise, well written and interesting read.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The cure for male loneliness is a better economy, as in improving their material conditions. not ideology.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What if I told you that feminism is part of a better economy?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah, sure. Feminism is a magic catch all for everything that's good.

Feminism is a force for good, but it's not a magic fucking word that fixes everything.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (21 children)

No it isnt. Community existed before capitalism and will exist after, too.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It would be nice if we could set aside our petty differences to build towards a sustainable future for all. I believe that would fix most of our current problems. But that gets in the way of profits or whatever.

load more comments
view more: next ›