this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

Television

2848 readers
460 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean, is it really a good idea to call a movie about a bunch of girls holes?

It's just asking for horrible jokes

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 18 points 1 month ago

I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought it was a poor choice.

I work with adults that mentally never left middle school. They already tell crass sexist jokes that make HR cry. I can only imagine the shit they'd come up with for something like this.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Maybe I'm just too autistic to understand, but why are all these "gender-swapped" movies going from men to women leads?

I understand that there are far more male-led movies to pick from, but I have not seen any movies that "go the other way".

Personally I think going in with the intention of gender swapping the male roles for the sake of gender swapping alone is a terrible premise. And the thought of watching The Sound of Music but with a male version of Maria is just weird. Or a male in the lead of Alien.

Granted, there are a lot of movies where the entire direction of the story, while not dependent on the person's gender, they aren't conducive to the opposite. Using my own example, Maria was a nun who became a governess, who became a step-mother. The swapped version would have to be a priest who became a (I don't know if there's a name for a male version?) live-in childcare provider, who became a step father. While not impossible, or even that wild to think about, it's not typical.

Is it just one of those "it's good to have representation" things? Like I personally know someone who thought black people couldn't be royalty because until they saw princess and the frog, there wasn't exactly a lot of diversity in Disney's princess catalogue (with apologies to Mulan and Pocahontas) so clearly there is something to be said about representation in media.

I am definitely over thinking it, but I really don't get why anyone wants, or thinks audiences want, gender swapped stories from 20/40/60+ years ago.

Thank you for coming to my TEDx Talk. Sorry you can't get the last 3 minutes back.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

because they're talentless hacks that can't come up with original content (or just refuse to pay people who can), same reason behind every reboot/remake

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I also don't get it, and don't like it. Then again I don't like reboots either like at all (exception, the KOTH continuation, they're doing alright).

Part of what made Alien so good is specifically that they had a woman in a typically-male role, Action Hero, but also it was an original movie.

To use an example you provided, I have no problem with Princess and the Frog, not exactly an original concept being based on The Brother's Grimm style stuff, but it draws from that well for inspiration and at least adds some originality, and representation is for sure important, I'm all for it! Whereas rebooting The Little Mermaid with a race-swapped Ariel is just a reboot with race swapping for good boy points and virtue signaling. Instead I'd much prefer a movie in what we could consider the expanded Little Mermaid universe that featured a black lead mermaid on some new adventure, maybe Ariel is old or dead or maybe not and they're bffs, maybe Ariel hasn't even been born and some Greek shit is happening on the mainland idk, but the possibilities are literally endless instead of "rerun same script but swap X."

(And let me be clear it's not entirely about the demographic-swapping, I hate live action reboots, reboots that don't have the same production staff, etc. Oddly the only "change" that isn't always terrible is cartoonification of live action things, sometimes that actually works like Toxic Crusaders.

KOTH gets a pass because they're doing the best they can, most OG members are back except the dead ones, the new animation isn't the best but the old way of cell animation is dead and lost, and the last fully cell animated episode was in season 8 anyway.)

I just want new and good, and preferably a return to practical effects.

Fun fact, the alien script was written without specified genders in any of the roles so it could have just as easily had a male lead or anything really.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

It's because it is now considered (more) socially acceptable for women to take an interest in historically masculine things/exhibit feminine behaviour. You do not need to be a gay woman to appreciate a film about a "tomboy". This doesn't work the other way around though, no one is really interested in films about boys/men doing historically feminine things/exhibiting feminine qualities. It's considered gay and weird/creepy, unless it's specifically played for laughs.

Like think about any famous film about a girl or a woman and then imagine if it would be successful with a male lead. It probably wouldn't, unless you massively overhaul the character and plot.

[–] justsquigglez@leminal.space 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Thank God, we did not need a reboot of this movie, let alone one with the Ghostbusters (2016) treatment. The original one did it almost perfectly.

Now if they can just make the same decision the next time someone there is like "We should reboot Hercules but in live action!" 🙄

[–] MathematicalMagpie@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"Omg, you know who would be a perfect Hercules!? Get The Rock on the line!" - some exec probably

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Maybe they could remaster old movies/shows and “re-release them” for attention like they do games? The tools they have to do it now are quite good.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Only if they don't pull a George Lucas and digitally alter the rerelease to have (their version of) Greedo shoot first completely invalidating Han's character arc.

I don't care if "that's what it was supposed to be the whole time we just fucked up," well since you fucked up that's how it is, consider it a happy accident and pretend you wrote it like that you dummy!

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago

Agreed, this was one of my favourites as a kid. Long overdue for a rewatch!

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

This is the kind of writing that should be laughed out of the room before anyone takes it another step forward. We're going to take

  1. A movie that probably cannot be improved
  2. Based on a book that didn't come out recently
  3. Swap the genders (it's called Holes, in case you missed that important detail
  4. Turn it into a TV show

Are studios truly this incapable of any original thoughts?

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Turning all the males into women for the movie Holes seems pretty fucked up.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Interesting choice to say "males" for men and "women" for women

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbh I have a habit of doing it myself, because one has been decided offensive while the other has not. The other option in this case isn't "men" either, rather it'd be "boys," Camp Green Lake being a juvenile detention facility, and "boys" inverse "girls" can often be interpreted objectionably as well. (Not to mention the whole "holes" correlation, uhh, might not want to associate that with juveniles...)

Though also I think this is the first time I've ever seen "males" called out like the inverse word.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and “boys” inverse “girls” can often be interpreted objectionably as well.

Huh? Anything like "men and girls" is weird, but "boys and girls" is completely normal

[–] smh@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

I'm just going to drop this right here: sign announcing visiting it l hours for girls and men at a small jail I took it while visiting my brother in jail. Kentucky.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Oh no, you’ve summoned THEM.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm looking forward to a female Die Hard or John Wick series - NOT!

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would watch the hell out of Janet McClane fucking up terrorists at Nakatomi Plaza. That sounds amazing.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

I will say Charlize did a nifty job in Atomic Blonde.