this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

electoralism

22218 readers
30 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

New York City Mayoral elect Zohran Mamdani previously called for the boycott of Cornell Tech over its public-private partnership with Technion — Israel Institute of Technology not long after he won a seat in the New York State Assembly in 2020, according to reporting in The New York Post.

As per the reporting, Mamdani allegedly discussed the boycott in a podcast called “Talking Palestine,” hosted by democratic socialist Sumaya Awad, citing Technion’s ties to the Israeli Defense Force in the Israeli-Palestine conflict and weapons development program.

“If you were to look at the lens of [the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement] and how it applies here in New York City, you would say that Cornell-Technion is something you would be talking about,” Mamdani reportedly said on the podcast, according the The New York Post.

“I’m sure that if we look close enough, there are either municipal subsidies or state subsidies granted to a project such as this on Roosevelt Island,” Mamdani said.

As Mayor-elect, Mamdani was asked by the Roosevelt Islander at a press conference whether he “currently support[s] a boycott of Cornell Tech [or if] has he ever supported a boycott [of Cornell Tech].” While Mamdani did not explicitly say he would no longer boycott Cornell Tech, he did not think the partnership was out of compliance with international law.

“Wherever the [Eric] Adams administration and previous administrations have taken us out of compliance with international law, we’ll return the city back into that compliance,” Mamdani said.

Upon further questioning from the reporter, Mamdani elaborated that he does not “think that [Cornell Tech] applies to what the Adam’s administration’s done,” appearing to say that he does not support a boycott of Cornell Tech

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Even as someone that didn't see Mamdani as the second coming of Marx lol, I don't want to hear about Mamdani again because it's all downhill from here and it's gonna be such a disappointment.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Consider blocking c/electoralism?

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sorry for pointing out zohran sucks

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't want to hear about Mamdani again

Just was trying to help.

[–] Monk3brain3@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Oh ok. Nah that was just a figure of speech.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The question now is if there is anything he will not "walk back" or "moderate".

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

fell-for-it-again-award

Just to be clear this isn't aimed at you but his voter base.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's 100k people that knocked doors for this guy and a few million that voted for him... what's stopping these people from getting organized and doing some sort of rolling strikes or slowdowns to force Mamdani to do what he said he would?

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because those people signed up to elect a Democrat, not fight one. If they wanted an independent working class force that could make politicians do what they want, they would have formed that party, rather than voting blue. Plus when you’re not organized, it’s pretty hard to pressure a person who’s already elected

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe having a pessimistic view of the working class army that materialized under this campaign will not help us get what we want. I will continue being optimistic because this team was not only massive, it was also AFAIK the first time in a long time that people were knocking on doors to talk about working class issues for a change.

They are probably not even majority Socialist, yes, but getting these people to talk about freezing the rent is a hell of a lot closer to our politics than 99.999% of Dems. This is an opportunity that I hope organizers on the ground in NYC are seizing!

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not pessimistic, realistic. They put in the work during the campaign and will go back to their lives, rather than fight the administration they just elected. NYC DSA certainly won’t be marshaling those people to work stoppages. If you want to be optimistic, go for it, I’m just outlining what’s preventing a mass movement from shutting down NYC until Mamdani follows through

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, be realistic. Just go beyond complaining and organize these people if you live in the area. Otherwise it's just leading to doomerism and dampening people's desire to log off and do some real organizing.

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

The more people think organizing for socialism means doorknocking for democrats, the longer we spin our wheels in this predicament. When did it become doomerism to critique socdems

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

The extra 6 upbears are the only thing keeping me going, as the clout demon that I am

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

The NYPD is more organized and armed than a mob of disgruntled voters.

[–] space_comrade@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People who are willing to actually follow through with stuff like that aren't really the majority of his voter base. I don't think much of his voter base is actually radicalized, they just want a slightly more left leaning democrat, which he is.

[–] MayoPete@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

How can the more left part of that group radicalize the majority of Mamdami's army? If 100k people can be organized to knock doors how many can be organized to picket city hall or occupy a landlord's office? Even getting 2% of those people really active could be a big deal!

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apparently, he's even ratfucking a DSA elect by endorsing Landers over them in a campaign. Even doing socdem politics isn't good enough to avoid being ratfucked.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

I am aware, I'm saying socdem (DSA elected) is getting ratfucked by transactional politics with another socdem.

[–] nasezero@hexbear.net 31 points 2 days ago
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago

The quotes in this article are being absolutely tortured to say what the headline says.

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 23 points 2 days ago

backwalking is the new hotness

[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Here's the clip so we can dispense with the desperate media spin

“I’m sure that if we look close enough, there are either municipal subsidies or state subsidies granted to a project such as this on Roosevelt Island,” Mamdani said.

“Wherever the [Eric] Adams administration and previous administrations have taken us out of compliance with international law, we’ll return the city back into that compliance,” Mamdani said.

So yes, he supports the boycott in theory, but is couching it in his usual line about "compliance with international law"

I don’t think that this applies to what the Adams administration has done

?????? Not sure what this ambiguous politician speak is supposed to mean, if it's a no, then it doesn't make sense considering the two comments he made literally ten seconds before, maybe the "this" he's referring to is the reporter's line of questioning, or he thinks Cornell is a separate beast to Adam

Either way the first two responses were overly-cautious but acceptable, the last response is dogshit and ambiguous and makes no sense in light of his first answers, creating not a "walk back" but self-inflicted confusion

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

Mamdani did not explicitly say he would no longer boycott Cornell Tech

ok

international law

since when has any american ever given a shit?