A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Yet another example of Russia being the war crime committing aggressor in the war.
People who take Russia's side embody values far closer to the Nazis than Ukraine ever has.
Don't worry the US wants a peace treaty that wipes all the war crimes clean
the US wants a peace treaty that wipes all the war crimes clean
And gives the invaders all the land they stole, while giving the victims of that invasion nothing but an empty promise to not do it again.
bombed
Chernobyl
Two words I'd never imagine seeing together in the same sentence
Whoever decided to do this should go toes first through a wood chipper
It's the same people who ordered their soldiers to dig trenches in the irradiated soil close to Chernobyl, in the brief time they occupied it, at the start of Russia's war. As long as it's happening away from Putin and his kelptocracy circles, they don't care about consequences to friends or foes, only how it will benefit them.
Why not? In a war nuclear sites immediately become prime targets.
No they don't, it's a really REALLY bad idea.
Think about it. If you win, you will win a nuclear hell scape that will cost you huge amounts of money to control and maintain, awesome!
There is a difference between what we want reality to be and what it actually is.
If we were talking about what we want, we wouldn't have this war in the first place.
I don’t remember who did it, but there was a good video explaining the issue months ago. It’s not just that there is a hole, but there are multiple layers in the system that are compromised. . A hole was made and a fire started in a lower layer. The fire spread in that space and firefighters needed to make more holes to put the fire out. It’s a major repair in a location that has major restrictions on the ability to execute repairs.
I've seen a documentary describing in detail the construction of the shelter, as well as a recent video by B1M talking about the damage caused by the drone, and this one. I believe you're talking about this discussion of the damage by Kyiv Independent?
3.6 roentgen, not great, not terrible
Chernobyl is the best mini series of all time hands down.
And absolutely terrifying.
Second to Generation Kill.
And Band of Brothers, but ahead of The Pacific.
And at the exact same site that birthed the meme
My first question was, why is this a target? This is terrorism and outside war rules (insane that we have rules for war instead of just not having it). Laws are only as good as their enforcement though.
Because russia thinks "we can take that and they wont risk defensing it or attempting to take it back because theyd be risking a nuclear disaster"
Its literally the exact same reasoning for why they didnt expect the rest of the world to get involved, because they have nukes.
Aside from the terrorism aspect, the remaining non-blown reactors were still providing power up until I think 2000 before it was finally fully shut down. Russia has obviously had a fixation on trying to destroy Ukraine's infrastructure and outside of any other potential fuckery is probably concerned that Ukraine will be able to power it back up again if they need to, especially if more of their infrastructure elsewhere is blown up.
Plus, even if the Russians lose Ukraine will still be left holding the bag for cleaning up and repairing whatever additional damage was done to the containment structures.
This is a clear example of Russian military interference and incompetence.
It's not incompetence. Incompetence is "My unguided drone veered off a few hundred feet and picked the wrong building." Someone high up intentionally picked Chernobyl as a target because they knew the west would foot the bill at any price, and this war is a spending game top to bottom. They hit their planned target, probably with a meter or two. This wasn't negligence or incompetence, it was pure malice.
I remember watching a real life lore video where the said the elephants foot is still molten and slowly melting through the flood of the basement of Chernobyl and it could eventually hit the ground water that’s underground and it could explode causing an even bigger situation then the original meltdown.
Afaik it's no longer fissioning, and it hasn't been for awhile. So it's not actually molten, and not particularly hot at all.
But it still has a lot of that spicy air
Bring in European/NATO country civilian aid to fix it. If Russia strikes again, you now have a reason to escalate support for Ukraine (including interpreting this as an attack on non Ukrainian assets). If they don't, the sarcophagus gets fixed. Which is the main goal.
It has a much cooler name than "shelter".
Chernobyl Cozy?
"New safe confinement". But you gotta put simple words for simple minds in the title.
Crazy Ivan?
The absolute most efficient method for increasing the likelihood of american and european military powers giving larger amounts of military aid to Ukraine.