this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
91 points (100.0% liked)

movies

2217 readers
316 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Spaceballs 2; super original guys.

Another Naked Gun; ooh! original!

The Matrix 5; we're original, i swear!

"New" Malcolm in the Middle; originality overload!

"New" King of the Hill; such original.

48th Aliens reboot; I'm dying from all this originality!

94th Predator movie; buy one original, get one free!

That's just what i can think of off the top of my head right now. I think he might have noticed a trend, or something...

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I’m hoping that the success of the original movies this year will lead to more.

Also, crazy how people have already forgotten about Sinners. That’s how great this year has been.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

People have not forgotten it, it's been rereleased into cinemas twice now and it hasn't even been released for a year yet.

I went again both times and the room was still packed

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, crazy how people have already forgotten about Sinners. That’s how great this year has been.

People live so fast nowadays, nobody talks about DBZ Sparking Zero or Silksong anymore for example (Metroid Prime 4 next).

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

DBZ Sparking Zero was underwhelming. People still talk about Silksong

[–] kratoz29@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

DBZ Sparking Zero was underwhelming.

Maybe in some regions, in LATAM is like the GOTY lol.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ummm, isn't Bugonia a remake of a Korean movie? Definitely not original.

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It only counts as a remake if it's a white movie. /s

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Oh i didn't know this

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One Battle After Another was great

[–] jbone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Saw it in the cinema, it was really good.

Was fun to see DiCaprio in a slightly different role than he usually plays.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Hollywood greenlights some original stuff but, judging by box office returns, the audiences don't go to see them.

I think Zootopia 2 will have beaten all the films he listed, plus Sinners and maybe One Battle After Another combined in it's first week or so.

So, assuming you're a producer, would you put your money into a safe bet like Jurrassic Park 12 or some indie project that hopefully makes its money back and maybe goes on a bit of a run?

[–] kaki@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think Zootopia 2 will have beaten all the films he listed, plus Sinners and maybe One Battle After Another combined in it’s first week or so.

I just checked, and you only need to combine Sinners and Weapons to beat Zootopia 2's first week ($620M), for a lower combined budget.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Oof, you're totally right, I was looking domestic for Weapons.

But, I mean, I think the point still stands. That's one weekend of one sequel which itself is unlikely to be the highest grossing movie of the year.

People don't really watch the original and interesting stuff.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I see tons of movies they have no idea I've seen. That's the natural result of making going to the theater a shitty experience. I'll still watch what I want to, you just won't get any benefit from it.

I would like it if there was a way to pay a studio / director / production company directly for their work on a film. The old ways of monetizing films don't really mesh with the way I engage with them.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago

If we keep stealing the good stuff, what on Earth is the incentive to make good stuff? Like, they'll make something SO good that we'll stop stealing?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And at Disney: “Let’s recycle our cartoon hits into live action. Then make them a musical. Then make them a musical cartoon.”

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 10 points 5 days ago

Sadly, that rehashed slop makes WAY more money than original films.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

The existence of massive or unoriginal franchises doesn't mean he's wrong.

[–] JoshsJunkDrawer@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's so funny about this is 1. Bugonia is a remake of a Korean film, 2. the director of Weapons was immediately hired to make yet another Resident Evil movie, and 3. Marty Supreme was based on the life of a real person. He's 0/3 on his examples.

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I'd call that 2/3. Bugonia is a remake of the Korean "Save the Green Planet", so he's wrong about that being original. "Weapons" is indeed an original film; the director being hired top make yet another Resident Evil film doesn't detract from that. "Marty Supreme" may be a biopic, but it's still an original film, rather than a remake of an earlier film. That does mean that it's an original project.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 1 points 3 days ago

I gave up on Hollywood years ago. Even the original movies are mostly meh and you have to watch a lot of them to find anything interesting. And the good ones are rarely marketed to you really have to look for them.