this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
29 points (100.0% liked)

Main, home of the dope ass bear.

16066 readers
128 users here now

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN "MAIN" OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion's Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


gun-unity State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

guaido Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

smoker-on-the-balcony Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

frothingfash Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

just-a-theory An Amainzing Organizing Story

feminism Main Source for Feminism for Babies

data-revolutionary Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


ussr-cry Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

what do you think of cloudflare, what can we do about the ceo of the cdn company, and are there any alternatives to their cdn?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Given this brazen lack of stability and accountability, I believe the only solution is to nationalize Cloudflare.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i think all monopolies should be split and collectivized by the workers. seriously!

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

It's counterproductive to split monopolies before collectivizing them. Collectivize them as monopolies. There's no need for the people to compete with each other / themselves.

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Depends on the nature of the monopoly. A lot of modern corporations have extensive ~~vertical~~ horizontal integration that might not make sense to preserve in collectivization.

[–] LeninWeave@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's true, but in those cases they're not being split to create competition, since the resulting companies wouldn't be operating in the same fields.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Why would vertical integration not be worth preserving in a state monopoly?

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It leads to a lot of unnecessary redundancy. Say you fold Department X from Corporation L into Agency B during collectivization, and then later collectivize Corporation M that has a department that does pretty much the same thing as Department. Unless there’s something particularly specialized about the nature if that department within the context of Corporation M, it’s more efficient to just roll it into Agency B as well.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but wouldn't doing that tend to increase rather than decrease the overall amount of vertical integration within Agency B?

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bugger, I just realized I got it backwards and should’ve been using “horizontal integration” this whole time

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Okay, but that would also increase by folding multiple competing companies into the same state agency

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

i mean split all monopolies into different companies, and have those collectivized by the workers. seriously!

[–] booty@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

the west has fallen everyone celebrate officer-down

[–] Big_Bob@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

crab-party hell yeah, fuck the internet. It's been useless for years now anyway. Can't search for anything that isn't AI generated trash or some scam website.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

do you think that in a communist society, the internet would be a bit more decentralized? also, have you heard of "reds! a revolutionary timeline"? it's an althistory timeline about what would happen if leon czolgosz gets arrested before he shoots mckinley, culminating in the us becoming a socialist country a lot like the ussr but with a more democratic and libertarian twist. seriously!

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

“The internet” is just at its core a network, and having a big networked library/archive sounds great for central planning.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Exactly. That’s what the internet will resemble under communism.

[–] Big_Bob@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, I don't see a timeline where the internet doesn't become a centralised tool for extreme surveillance.

It's why it was made in the first place. Besides, any real socialist revolution needs an iron grip on any mass media, digital or otherwise, to track down and stamp out counter revolutionary movements.

Decentralised networks would be a catastrophic weak spot and a breeding ground for fascists.

The golden age of the internet is over and the era only served as a means to get everyone on the grid for surveillance purposes. Now, governments all over the world are taking off the masks and reigning in any free use of the internet through waging war on privacy, free speech and imposing Chat Control everywhere.

The internet was always a weapon for class rule. It can not and will never be anything else.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

i think the internet being used for extreme surveillance counts as coercion which is against the non-aggression principle (DON'T use force and coercion to anyone). seriously!

[–] ghosts@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, I tripped on the cord and spilled my beans all down the back of the internet. Should be good now, sorry.

[–] DylanMc6@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

are you eating baked beans or tomato beans?

[–] ghosts@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

It's actually black beans and tortilla chips, good question though

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago
[–] 21Gramsci@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

I guess I'm happy I moved piratefeeds.net off of cloudflare a few days ago...

Who could have foreseen that centralizing critical internet infrastructure under a handful of providers could be a bad idea? Except the people who built the early internet as intentionally decentralized ofc

[–] aanes_appreciator@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Just stop using CDNs, just ship fewer assets. I will not be convinced otherwise.

Seriously though I did experience this first hand because my home server is exposed to the internet via Cloudflare's DNS. And shortly thereafter when my CTO was like "ah yes the website and app is down and no one can access the company services because our VPN is also cloudflare.