What he says and what he does is two DIFFERENT things.
He SAYS things to distract you from what he is DOING.
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
399 points (99.3% liked)
politics
27195 readers
2059 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
“I dont care if the files get released” says man who happens to also be furiously shoving documents into paper shredder
Who cares what time it is, I have a Rolex.
load more comments
(2 replies)
What happened to, "there aren't any epstein files, it was all a hoax by the radical left?"
It's not real but if it is then it's a hoax and if it's not a hoax it's okay to fuck kids.
Because they're older kids, it's not pedophilia, right? Just gotta think of a new angle!
15 is basically 16 is basically 17 and de facto 18. Wham bam, case closed.
load more comments
(8 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Even better, just release them :3
He doesn't care?
Then tell us who bubba is!? Who'd you blow? Who's knob did you gobble? We're all dying to know, Mr. Doesn't Care.
Thought they didn't exist, Donny boy?
It's very simple...
He doesn't care if the files, which don't exist, get released, which he could do unilaterally, but he won't, since he doesn't care, because he's not in them, and they're a political hit job by the democrats, or they would be, if they were real, but they aren't.
Got it?
He's tried every other argument, now he's trying reverse psychology again
load more comments
(1 replies)
Demented old fool has forgotten he's in them
Nah. I'm sure he knows he's in them. He probably just thought he could tell one of his sycophants to remove or redact his name like they could just do a "find all" and delete. He probably thinks his name has been scrubbed.
They probably did that but it didn't match DONNI TEE which is how that email got released
Maybe the only part he was worried about getting out was him sucking a guy's dick
Unlikely
Why should he care if they prove he committed heinous crimes? Nothing is going to be done about it
Sucking a guy's dick isn't a crime, but sex with a minor sure is.
He has already been convicted of multiple other felonies and doesn’t serve time. Why should this be any different?
I don't know that it would be, but he sure seems to think so. I think him trying so desperately to cover it up for so long has made it more damaging than it would have been if he'd just owned it when his cult was clamoring for the files to be released. He'd downplay it with his usual word salad, news articles would be written about how terrible it was, and nothing of consequence would happen to him. Now, though? It's not just about the horrendous crimes, but his betrayal of his conspiracy theorist cult. Maybe it would still amount to nothing, but he hasn't done himself any favors by alienating his cultists.
I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how Trump will face repercussions for these crimes when he hasn't for any other crimes. Who is going to prosecute him? What is the plan if the files prove he committed heinous crimes? Since he's clearly immune to all consequences of crimes, I think he's more concerned about people thinking he's gay
IF anything happens to him, it will be because he has eroded the trust of his conspiracy theorist cult by trying to cover up his pedophilia more than the pedophilia itself. A lot of his power is derived from his cult, which the Republicans are terrified of alienating. If he loses enough of their support, Republicans won't be so hell-bent on protecting him at all costs. It's a big "if."
load more comments
(2 replies)
Which is what they just said?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Suuuure he doesn't care..
(That's why he's got Pam Bondi digging through them to find dirt on the Democrats.)
He's gotta act cool, no matter what..
I'm 100% sure there are democrats in the files. However, the fact that they haven't released any den names or tried to prosecute any sure is interesting.
Would be difficult to use the actual documents to pick and choose only Democrats to prosecute while protecting Republicans. Might as well just make everything up at at that point.
Isn't that what they are already doing? They have been cherry-picking dems and blue states to prosecute for everything else. Even the redistricting in Texas is being looked past while they turn around and do it to California.
load more comments
(3 replies)
He thinks the ones his fbi has redacted are the ones we're gonna go with
What I still don't get is why the dems didn't release the files when they could. We could have been freed from Trump and other pedophiles.
I’m assuming it’s most likely those files are also riddled with dems in them.
At this point, release the files and put everyone in them who’s guilty away. If they’re guilty of raping children castrate them.
America needs to rebuild its government from the ground up.
Death to pedophiles.
For most of Biden's term they were sealed under court order. But that ended Jan 1st, so there was 20 days to issue the order.
load more comments
(1 replies)
After dodging this issue for over a year? Press X to doubt.
Translation: he really, really cares.
That's not what he's telling his toadies in Congress
gets punched in face
IT DUSNT HURRRT
There are no consequences for anything that he’s done, so why would he care?
load more comments
(1 replies)
The Narcissist's Prayer
- That didn't happen.
- And if it did, it wasn't that bad.
- And if it was, that's not a big deal.
- And if it is, that's not my fault.
- And if it was, I didn't mean it.
- And if I did, you deserved it.
by Dayna Craig
We're at line 3, it seems
load more comments
(1 replies)
Good news everyone!
view more: next ›