this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
183 points (96.0% liked)

News

33081 readers
3957 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The deal, negotiated by a group of Democrats and GOP leaders, funds the government through Jan. 30. If it passes, it will still need to clear the House, which will likely take days.

WASHINGTON — Senators struck an agreement Sunday, projecting confidence that it will be sufficient to end the lengthy U.S. government shutdown, three sources with direct knowledge of the details told NBC News.

The agreement, reached by a group of Democrats who teamed up with Republicans, should have the necessary 60 votes to clear the Senate, these sources said. It would then need to pass the House and earn President Donald Trump's signature to become law and reopen the government.

Even if it has enough support to clear those hurdles, the process is expected to take days.

The agreement contains a “minibus” — three full-year appropriations bills that will fund certain departments like Agriculture through the end of the fiscal year next fall — and a continuing resolution to fund the rest of the government at existing spending levels through Jan. 30.

It would also fully fund the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, once known as food stamps, through next September, a major flashpoint in the shutdown.

The sources said the deal also reverses Trump’s attempted layoffs of federal workers during the shutdown through RIFs, or “reduction in force” notifications.

But in a major concession from Democrats, it does not include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. Allowing the funds to lapse would raise insurance premiums for millions of Americans unless they are extended. Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain, two of the sources said.

Even then, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., has said he won’t promise that the House will vote on extending the subsidies.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

There's no denying that what Republicans are doing is evil and will kill millions of Americans. But there's another kind of evil in standing down and allowing an evil force to do whatever the hell they want. Do not forget today, the day Democrats abandoned you to the Republicans whim.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago
[–] Seaguy05@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the argument for conceding is to let people feel the pain so they know the Dems were fighting for everyone. That is assuming they are and it's not some corpo facade. At this point who knows.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

People will die as a result of the Democrats allowing Republicans to strip healthcare funding. To allow that to happen in order to gain political leverage is unconscionable.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 14 points 13 hours ago

“Whelp, we tried. I mean, I didn’t care anyway” -every democrat that votes yes

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

Any democrats that vote for this need to become pariahs

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

Fucking pathetic.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

the Democrats settled for a promise

Typical Neoliberals: always willing to sell out the country in exchange for the assurances of liars that they're going to do the opposite of what they always do 🤬🤦

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Center Party in 1933: "Resisting won't stop them, might as well trade our support for promises. They'll keep the Reichstag and Reichsrat, they'll keep all the organs of government, they'll keep the states, they'll leave the church be, they'll inform us of what they're doing and they'll give it to us in writing."

Not a single promise was kept, not even the "give it to us in writing" bit. They still voted for the empowerment, trusting Hitler's word, until they dissolved in the face of an impending ban.

Do not settle for promises from people who won't even be faithful to their God, the constitution or the rule of law. They won't be faithful to you either.

Do not negotiate with Nazis. They'll shake your hand and spit in your face.

[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 215 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (18 children)

I think what the headline means to say is "In exchange for nothing, Democrats sell out their constituents"

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago

Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain

I wonder what will be "uncertain" about the Republicans killing ACA?

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 135 points 1 day ago (6 children)

But in a major concession from Democrats, it does not include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies. Allowing the funds to lapse would raise insurance premiums for millions of Americans unless they are extended. Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain, two of the sources said.

This is why we can't have nice things.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"With the outcome uncertain"

Everyone saying this needs to be fired from whatever position they hold. The outcome is 100% certain. Democrats just voted to gut healthcare.

[–] collar@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If this was the end result, why did we even have a shutdown? Weren’t these subsidies the main sticking point?

Classic Schumer… hold out for nothing.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago

Not for nothing. Republicans are gonna gain a lot of support because of this. So it was actually for less than nothing

[–] theoneandonlyeggboi@lemmings.world 14 points 19 hours ago

This is what "socially liberal, fiscally conservative" gets us.

spits

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

And the ratchet clicks

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 19 points 22 hours ago

Instead, the Democrats settled for a promise that the Senate will vote on a bill to extend the subsidies by the end of the second week of December, with the outcome uncertain...

... Uncertain is a word used when you aren't sure what the outcome will be.

Uncertain is certainly NOT the word to use in this situation.

Republicans in December: HAHAHAHAHAHA fuck you Dems, we vote no. Next.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theoneandonlyeggboi@lemmings.world 23 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Does anyone else think it's bullshit how Congress gets paid while the shutdown is going on?

[–] Jerkface@lemmy.world 26 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's bullshit that we don't elect an entire new Congress when this one can't govern.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

The US has virtually no "emergency brake" option in government. In a Westminster-style system not being able to pass a budget immediately triggers an election, while government remains funded based on the previous budget.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Not really. Withholding compensation only impacts those with the least amount of outside money. In other words, the most corrupt would be able to leverage it against the least corrupt.

I think it's bullshit that "keep the government open" hasn't been made permanent yet. Same with paying our debts.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Democrats as so spineless. If they had even 50% of the fighting spirit that Republicans had (though they fight for things like taking away rights from minorities and taking money from the poor to give to their wealthy buddies), then we'd have universal healthcare, CONUS high-speed rail, complete renewable energy power, etc.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 14 points 19 hours ago

OLD Guard dnc is only electable because of republicans mismanagement of the previous admin, they dont really have any campaign promises of thier own, other than "promises", they are codependent on gop to fuck, up so they get elected. thats why they dont often repeal what the gop legislate, because also benefits them, and they usually have the same donors.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 95 points 1 day ago (4 children)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Frankly, these are just the ones that were most convenient for the Dems to throw under the bus. Many more are complicit, Chuck Schumer most of all. Let's be as loud about demanding his resignation as we are about the Epstein files. He's failed the American people far too many times.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

“Chuck the cuck gotta go!” Has a nice ring to it…

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 50 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

And they're all retiring. Don't bother remembering their names, and instead elect good candidates. Pay attention to your local elections and don't just vote for someone because they have a D next to their name

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 16 points 22 hours ago

Vote in the damn primaries!

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, I thought Obama was going to be a change candidate instead of an inspiring war criminal

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

He betrayed Ukraine by letting Russia take Crimea and not sending arms during the Donbass war. The current war is proof the US was weak on Russia

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Call these fuckers up. Tell them to grow a spine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 100 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If the GOP isn't going to fund the subsidies now, they're not going to do it in a couple of months. A teenager could see through a lie like that. I knew the Dems were cowards, but before this year I really didn't know just how leaderless we've been.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did they cave? Of course they did. Vote them out if they caved.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 day ago

Everyone who caved was already either retiring or otherwise not up for reelection. Do you think it's a coincidence that they got exactly as many yes votes as they needed? The entire democrat party needs replaced.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

BREAKING: Democrats officially take credit for longest shutdown in US history

I'm so livid. The Democrats just threw away the most politically advantageous position they've had in the last 197 years. They could have just done nothing until the next election cycle and guarantee a monumental blue wave, a blue fucking tsunami, as people would vote en masse to replace Republicans with Democrats because this shutdown was obviously 100% on the Republicans. Instead they decided to turn that politically advantageous position against themselves. They saw the Republicans tying themselves a noose, and leapt right into it.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

All the dems responsible are either retiring or not up for reelection at the midterms, theres a reason Schumer moved behind the scenes and tapped who he tapped. They should all be held accountable. Staged reistance from Chuckle fuck

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 27 points 23 hours ago

The agreement contains a “minibus” — three full-year appropriations bills that will fund certain departments like Agriculture through the end of the fiscal year next fall — and a continuing resolution to fund the rest of the government at existing spending levels through Jan. 30.

Cool. So those departments are going away next year.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Anyone know who the Democrats are in the "group of Democrats who teamed up with Republicans" to get to 60 votes is? I want to know the names of the ones who turned coat and caved.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MelonYellow@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well we knew this would end once the flights were getting cancelled. It’s all for show. 🙄

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 34 points 23 hours ago

Senate democrats casually sacrificing 44 million lives so that their thanksgiving plans won't be interrupted

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

We need to make it clear to the Democratic Party that we won't just primary the Senators that do this. We will primary every Democrat up for election in 2026. They need to have their futures tied to the defectors. Republicans seem to be able to keep their delegation in line. Time to start playing hardball.

load more comments
view more: next ›