this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
425 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26307 readers
4037 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeICEAmerica@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

LOL Democrat states need to announce they are in the planning stage of building the Super Max Prisons that will be needed to house all the convicts once Trump is toppled. ALL ICE and any local and State police that helped will need to have swift trials and LIFE sentences to dissuade this from ever happening again. We were too nice to the Nazis last time. We won't make that same mistake.

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Never happen. Politicians have a direct interest in keeping the violent gang members cultivated to protect their interests out of jail. If the enforcers go to jail, how long do you think it'll take the capos to join them?

See, we never actually "punished" the nazis. We gave them jobs and government positions. We gave them benefits and Healthcare and pensions. We couldn't possibly get rid of nazis without getting rid of our neighbors and politicians, so we never did.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Really? This is the hill ya wanna die on?

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Doesn't matter because the Democrats caved so all of this was for naught and all this leverage is now gone.

The pr was getting terrible for Donnie and his party, the slide was getting steeper.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, good luck with that. People were sent their full SNAP in my state because a judge ordered those benefits to be paid. I get a case for stopping further States' distributions given the more recent judgement, but the idea that they'll be able to claw back money from the States that have already distributed the full amount seems insane. People got sent what they were entitled to, in the amount they were entitled to, after a judge's order saying to do that and before another judge's order saying not to do that. So I just don't conceive of an argument that a court would accept that would retroactively claw that money back from people.

I WANT PEOPLE TO STARVE DAMMIT

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago

Fucker can ignore a court order, twice, states can ignore whatever he says.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It's like he wants us to physically overthrow him

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 12 points 14 hours ago

Yes he does. He literally wants that to be attempted so he can impose the insurrection act and take all power.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 5 points 14 hours ago

Maybe! My money is he wants the shutdown to keep going so he can justify declaring martial law.

Because he loves democracy....And wishes to reorganize into the first galactic empire.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why would the Democrats do this?

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's because they're dirty liberals! And the nice thing about using "liberal" as an insult is that you can claim to be on either end of the political spectrum when you do it, depending on what's convenient at the time.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I've also seen both sides of the political spectrum using the term "liberal" to describe themselves positively.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 5 points 15 hours ago

Im sure the state's right ppl are real upset over this.

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It blows my mind that that ratfucked littlecoward of a traitor to America has actually managed to normalize starving citizens to his little criminal organization masquerading as “politicians”.

He’s got them all on board doing shit they probably never would have believed they’d do when they started out.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

They always were on board, they just never had the guts.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As someone from poor rural Midwest, I can tell you from first hand experience, that people have usually ran out of food stamps about 3 weeks into the month.
Meaning, most people on snap are waiting for the first to get groceries because they don't have anything.

And now we are going on week 2 of the month.

So for many. It's now getting close to 3 weeks without food money.

And with the rising food costs, I wouldn't be surprised if people are running out of snap money closer to the midpoint of the month.

So for them. It's been 4 weeks

[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago (7 children)

He’s banking on many of them resorting to crime so he can say, “see! I told you!” and justify martial law and calling the nations guard to come down hard on American citizens.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 205 points 1 day ago (3 children)

A better source.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/09/trump-administration-tells-states-to-undo-full-snap-benefits-00643887

USDA’s latest memo, sent Saturday to state directors of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, instructed states to deliver just 65 percent of benefits during the government shutdown and required those who already sent full payments to claw back that money.

There really is no bottom to this administrations evil.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

The only saving grace is that most of the people who I know that are on SNAP fucking love Trump and will probably keep loving him even after this. Maybe it's where I live but it's getting harder and harder to feel bad for these people getting hurt by Trump's policies because most of them still fucking love him.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 68 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It confirms my theory that they are desperately trying to implement the mass killing of people.

The political violence they wanted isn't happening. The dropping vaccine rates isn't fast enough. And now people aren't starving as they should be.

That indicates to me that they are finding out just how hard it is to kill 268,000,000 people. It might have something to do with the fact that 268,000,000 are more than enough to keep themselves alive.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have theory that the Republican party (note, not voters) is made of three very different factions:

  • Christians hoping to bring about Armageddon and the end of times so they can get to heaven. How they hope to get to heaven by supporting Trump is beyond me. In the mean time, they'll settle for Christian theocratic dictatorship.
  • Atheist tech-bros that can see the environment is going to shit. Their plan is to remove as many people as possible to reduce the impact of humans on the environment, replacing them with AI and robots as needed.
  • Old, oil connected and/or corrupt politicians that just don't give a fuck so long as they get a fat pay cheque. They are too rich and old to ever feel the consequences of this administration.

While they have wildly different motivations, they seem to agree on letting people die serves their goals.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

It's actually, in order of demographic size, biggest to least:

  • Politicians that just don't give a fuck so long as they keep a fat pay cheque.
  • Tech-bros that want to replace people with AI so as to get keep fat pay cheque..
  • Christians/religious whose hate, xenophobia, and intolerance is more important than anything else
[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ok but that middle one sounds way different from the other two. Js, the 1% are responsible for 99% of our pollution.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but if enough of us die...? To be clear, these tech-bros are truly evil, they will do whatever it takes to secure their wealth and lifestyle.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, thats kinda what im getting at. Currently, behind fossil fuels, the most polluting/environmentally unfriendly industry im aware of is ai development.

Full controversial disclosure: ive been studying actual AI since the early 00s. I know what the tech is capable of and im very well versed in it. Llms are a nichely useful tool, but thats it. That is not even close to the max potential for AI. Most of the things the tech bros promise are theoretically possible, but theyre so wildly misleading about it as to basically say that they are just lying. The current AI bubble WILL pop before we see too much cooler stuff, but I am confident that the tech will still be looked into, just at a regular scale instead of being massively blown out of proportion. Eventually it will be like it used to be, with small incremental inprovements in multiple different fields and the occasional breakthrough where someone combines the fields. And this should all be happening without consumers being aware of it, basically. Not that is shiuld be hidden, but they shouldnt be writing news articles about it because real progress is slow. LLMs absorb a shitload of energy and require extreme cooling, but we know thats not a requirement for human level thought because... you dont require any of that.

If you want to actually keep up with the real progress in actual AI instead of tech bro crap or llm crap, follow Two Minute Papers on youtube. Hes far from the only source ive looked into over the years, but he has some distinct advantages over most other ai sources. He does all the paper scouring for you so you can stay up to date on the latest ai progression(again, NOT LLMS, THIS TECH HAS 0 TO DO WITH LLMS. THEY DO NOT SHARE THE SAME ARCHITECTURE, THEY DO NOT RUN ON THE SAME HARDWARE. IT IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT.) and he breaks it down succinctly, simply, and without overselling it or any of the other propaganda. He reviews papers that are currently released and checks out the AI behind it. He also handles algorithms which are super cool!

[–] atmorous@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How does open source Ai Proton Lumo compare to the others?

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago

Id have to look into it specifically. If i can remember ill give you an update when i get home from work

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s a plausible theory. They want to create a system that inevitably leads to revolution, so they need to weaken those that might revolt as much as possible. They are also stubbornly sticking to the old rightist tactic of inflicting pain and suffering while trying to blame that pain and suffering on their opponents. That tactic is starting to fail, which means they have to fall back to weakening those who will rise up. They are openly admitting that they know their criminal coup has been noticed and won’t be forgotten.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

It's so unnecessarily cruel.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 131 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You MUST Stop FEEDING STARVING AMERICAN CHILDREN!

-Republicans LITERALLY!

[–] Inaminate_Carbon_Rod@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

Republicans when handing out business loans like candy during COVID:

It’s just too difficult to get all that money back. Just forgive all the loans.

Republicans when children are fed with government benefits

GET THAT FUCKING MONEY BACK RIGHT NOW

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (20 children)

It's even worse than that. It's quite literally taking food BACK out of their mouths.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

From the admin whose favorite way of passing the time is ignoring court orders.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, the Trump starvation agenda.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 21 points 1 day ago

He should come take mine back personally so I can ruin his day.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please stop linking to CBS News.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 32 points 1 day ago (11 children)

so what is the purpose of this? Besides the obvious "evilness". Is it to better control the masses? Or retaliation for protesting? For force people to get a second or third job to say he is creating jobs? What is the logic behind this?

[–] chisel@piefed.social 47 points 1 day ago

It's a tactic to get the Dems, who actually give a shit about starving children, to fold and allow the Republicans to take away our already shit healthcare and to protect pedophiles and child traffickers.

[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are holding the most vulnerable Americans hostage in the hopes that it will convince the democrats to allow them to be hurt in a different way, by agreeing to the proposed budget.

But most importantly, they are also trying to extend the duration of the shutdown, while making it seem like they aren't the ones doing it. So the deal they are offering has to stay something that the democrats would never agree to....

So they also benefit from anything other than that being what is in the news, but they have lots of practice making sure the news is talking about stupid stuff instead of important stuff.

As long as the government is shut down, the vote to release the Epstein documents can't happen. Currently if it happened, it would pass. That will be devastating not to just trump, but a large percentage of rich republicans, in and out of government. (As well as a small percentage of rich democrats) so they are just waiting until the situation changes enough that they think a vote would go their way.

And while that does seem both comically evil and too simple to possibly be what it is all about.... or wait... does it still seem too evil and simple to be the real plan?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›