
politics
Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.
Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.
Take any slop posts to the slop trough
Main is good for shitposting.
Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.
Off topic posts will be removed.
Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.
I don't how even DNC ghouls don't realize she's a charisma void. She always looks uncomfortable on camera, laughs at weird times, everything she says comes off super scripted (probably because it was scripted by a commit of DNC ghouls).
You think the DNC could find a normie neoliberal who at least had some personality, I mean fuck you guys managed to find Obama, there has to be another Obama out there.
At this point the only way to understand how the DNC weirdos work is to imagine that the Habsburg family had maintained power while enthusiastically inbreeding over the last 300 years and continue to stridently believe that they are attractive and likable.
They don't want another Obama, he made a slight lip service to doing good things instead of bad things, which is too extreme for the DNC.
My turn on the lathe
Trump loopholes the 22nd amendment to run for a third term. Barfsack OCrumbo runs for a third term under the same loophole.
Trump beats Obama
Thank you for coming to my ted talk
Obama would trounce Trump. Kamala was uniquely uncharismatic and the VP of an extremely unpopular, dementia-riddled, enthusiastically genocidal president while loudly proclaiming that she was not going to do anything different if she were elected. Obama is a charismatic guy and he's smart enough to lie about doing things differently. He's also a man, which helps. I feel like people overestimate Trump's popularity because he narrowly beat two of the worst candidates of all time. Hillary Clinton is uniquely reviled and Kamala Harris is completely incompetent. Trump would've lost against 2020 Biden and he would get absolutely stomped by Obama, an actually popular Democrat.
Even Harris would've probably won, despite her awful policies and political instincts, had any of the following things been true:
-
No ongoing genocide in Gaza
-
Biden drops out earlier and lets her run a full campaign without sabotaging her
-
Kamala is either male and/or white
-
The Harris campaign doesn't muzzle Tim Walz
This is not to excuse Harris in any way, the point is just that Trump is unpopular and any milquetoast neoliberal centrist could probably beat him. It's just that his opponents so far have been a man with his brain leaking out of his ears, an unelected emergency backup on Xanax and Hillary Rodham Clinton.
this is the hard hitting 100% correct truth juice i keep coming back to hexbear for
There really was a lot of positive energy when she picked Walz. He did kinda shit himself in the debate with Vance but Vance was pretty bad too. I actually think if they let Walz be Walz and also promised to end the genocide in Gaza, Kamala would have won. But I think she was really threatened by Walz taking over the spotlight more than anything, so they shut him up quick.
I cannot fathom though, why she clung so closely to Biden. Reading those clips from her book, she sounded like she basically let him bully her around. My best guess is that she’s really that spineless, but also her and most high level dems genuinely refused to believe that Biden was as unpopular as he was. Crossing him would have made her more popular, even with Dem voters.
Kamala would have won if she lied and said she would give Americans a bigger stimulus check than trump did.
Besides Hillary lost not due to the popular vote but due to the electoral system.
Yeah, just goes to show that people don't like Trump if even fkn Hillary got more votes.
Lathe overdrive: he will be dem candidate. Donald Trump (D) vs Elon musk (R)
Obama beats Trump.
Supreme Court rules in 6-3 decision that it's illegal for Obama to have a third term, but it is legal for Trump, because "Fuck you, that's why". Trump is president.
If the Democratic Primary ends up being Kamala vs Biden vs Hillary, it will be the best primary ever.
How to lower election turnout by 25 million with one easy trick
She should! HRC too! Let's just go down in the biggest fireball possible.
Kamala with Hillary as VP so they both can loose against Trump in 2028 again.
I'm riding with Biden 2028 sorry
Damn right I’m voting for Hunter
The only candidate that can beat Trump.
I didn't think USA was doing the election thing again?
Now that they've realized the Trump administration isn't doing anything to actually target them personally and instead focusing on people with actual moral convictions and a backbone, like Pro-Palestine protestors or, god forbid, actual fucking leftists, and also other targeted minorities like Hispanics and trans people(whom they also don't care for), they can feign collective amnesia over their "Trump is going to remove elections!" fearmongering and continue batting for the blue fascist like they usually do.
Not for like 3 more years no, but you better believe we won’t shut up about it until then
Most important of our lives, I'm told. And if you can chip in $2.70, it will something something revolution, something something "my good friend" Joe Biden. Corn Pops.
good luck winning your home state in the primaries lol

please no i can't take this anymore
Please don't Kamala. You contributed in no small part to the genocide in Gaza, had no plan for sweeping change to Campaign Finance Laws, caved to Anti-Immigration sentiments on the right, played footsie with Cheney, not to mention all that shit with catering to cops while you were a lawyer, and...
Look, we have short attention spans sure, but we also can look up your track record and it's not looking too good. Go fucking home Kamala, it's better than you deserve.
EDIT: wording.
She's a great candidate and I loved what she said about the coconut trees, but I'm voting for the cancer in Biden's prostate this time
The 5,000 vote presidential election can happen within our lifetime
YAAAS QUEEN! It certainly won't be embarrassing a second time.
*third time
Former US Vice-President Kamala Harris has told the BBC she may run again for the White House.
In her first UK interview, Harris said she would "possibly" be president one day and was confident there will be a woman in the White House in future.
Making her strongest suggestion to date that she will make another presidential bid in 2028 after losing to Donald Trump last year, Harris dismissed polls that put her as an outsider to become the Democrats' pick for the next election.
Speaking to Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, Harris also turned her fire on her former rival, branding Trump a "tyrant", and said warnings she made about him on the campaign trail had been proved right.
As the Democratic party searches for answers about Republican Donald Trump's decisive victory one year ago, much of the blame has been directed at former President Joe Biden for not standing down sooner.
But there have also been questions raised about whether Harris could have run a better campaign and set out a clearer message on the number one issue, the economy.
In the BBC interview Harris entertained the prospect of another run at the White House, saying her grandnieces would, "in their lifetime, for sure", see a female president.
Asked if it would be her, she said, "possibly", confirming she is considering another run at the top job.
Harris said she had not yet made a decision, but underlined that she still sees herself as having a future in politics.
"I am not done," the former vice-president said. "I have lived my entire career as a life of service and it's in my bones."
Responding to odds that place her as an outsider to win a place on the Democratic ticket - even behind Hollywood actor Dwayne the Rock Johnson - she said she never listened to polls.
"If I listened to polls I would have not run for my first office, or my second office - and I certainly wouldn't be sitting here."
Harris also said she believed predictions she made about Donald Trump behaving as a fascist and running an authoritarian government had come true.
"He said he would weaponise the Department of Justice - and he has done exactly that."
She pointed to the suspension of late-night comic Jimmy Kimmel by ABC after he made a joke about Republican reaction to the death of right-wing influencer Charlie Kirk.
His removal from the airwaves, celebrated by Trump, came after the Trump-appointed regulator threatened Kimmel's broadcasters.
"You look at what has happened in terms of how he has weaponised, for example, federal agencies going around after political satirists… His skin is so thin he couldn't endure criticism from a joke, and attempted to shut down an entire media organisation in the process."
Harris also slammed business leaders and institutions in America who have, in her view, too easily bowed to the president's demands.
"There are many… that have capitulated since day one, who are bending the knee at the foot of a tyrant, I believe for many reasons, including they want to be next to power, because they want to perhaps have a merger approved or avoid an investigation."
The White House was dismissive when asked for a response to Harris's comments about the president.
"When Kamala Harris lost the election in a landslide, she should've taken the hint - the American people don't care about her absurd lies," said spokeswoman Abigail Jackson.
"Or maybe she did take the hint and that's why she's continuing to air her grievances to foreign publications."
Harris has just published her account of her rollercoaster campaign, 107 Days, the time that was left to her to run for the presidency after Biden withdrew from the race following months of speculation about his mental acuity.
In our full interview with the former vice-president, to be broadcast in the UK on Sunday at 09:00 GMT (05:00 EST), I pressed Harris several times on whether she ought to have urged Biden to make way for her sooner.
How much did she really know about his health? And a question that may haunt her - whether she would be president now, not Donald Trump, if Biden had withdrawn earlier?
The answer is plainly, unknowable - the great "if" that could have changed the fate of America.
Among the Democratic soul-searching, Harris' candidacy is often disparaged, her weaknesses as a leader pinpointed as the reasons for her defeat, not just the last-minute nature of Biden's decision.
When questioned about what went wrong, rather than plunge into deep analysis, her contention is because she started so late, it was almost impossible to win.

But having sat down with the Californian former prosecutor in the gilded surroundings of a luxury London hotel - rather than the increasingly golden surroundings of the Oval Office as Donald Trump glitzes up the decor - the possibility of power is something she is not willing to leave behind.
Previous hints of her future presidential ambition seemed coy, non-committal - "maybe, maybe not", or "I'm not focusing on that right now".
Her candour in our conversation was more striking. She was quick, eager even, to put herself in the frame for another tilt at power. But she stopped short of making any concrete commitment.
That may be surprising given the thoroughly bruising nature of a defeat she has described as traumatising. She and her team were devastated by the defeat, which came as a surprise to them.
"My god, my god, what will happen to our country?" Harris says she repeated when the result came through.

Her attempt to explain it focuses on how narrow the gap in actual votes was between her and Trump.
The popular vote was, indeed, very tight, with less than 2% in it. However, Harris was trounced by Trump in the all-important electoral college, where each state has a certain number of votes that tally up.
Harris was willing to drop heavy hints about her own future. But there's less willingness from her, or frankly any other senior Democrats, grappling with their party's long-term dilemmas.
How does a centre-left party with mainstream leaders take on a right-wing populist leader? Is the answer to focus on Trump? Or is it to argue more forcefully for Main Street?
When I challenged the former vice-president on why her campaign did not better connect with working people, she said she needed more time to do that, and pointed to a longstanding drift away from her party among that group.

She regrets she didn't have long enough in 2024 to make her own pitch on bread- and-butter issues like housing, or childcare.
But if she had longer next time round, it's far from guaranteed her arguments would be more compelling, or more gladly received.
Kamala Harris still travels with the trappings of an entourage. Aides anxiously watch the clock as her every minute is planned with military precision. Non-stop travel, choreographed events in different capitals, a tiny number of carefully planned TV interviews.
This time, Harris is on the move for a book tour, not a presidential race. But maybe, if she has her way, this is the start of another campaign after all.
she didn't have long enough in 2024 to make her own pitch on bread- and-butter issues like housing, or childcare.
love this total bullshit line. she could have used the time she spent talking about having the most lethal military for this
"Hey you wanna take a break from fangirling over fracking (and, by extension, the breakdown of the planet's climate) until you're foaming at the mouth to throw some bones to the working class?"

"No?"

"What about talking about the benefits of a diverse and pluralistic society?"

"Okay, how about ending an ongoing genocide?"

"Oh, so just the fracking and the murder then?"
She and her team were devastated by the defeat, which came as a surprise to them.
excuse me but didn't we find out that they never had polling where they were in the lead and pretended confidence anyway
Responding to odds that place her as an outsider to win a place on the Democratic ticket - even behind Hollywood actor Dwayne the Rock Johnson - she said she never listened to polls.
"If I listened to polls I would have not run for my first office, or my second office - and I certainly wouldn't be sitting here."
They were surprised because they think polls are wrong on account of their very big brains and smashing electoral successes
Yeah, they're trying to rewrite history, something amerikans do all the time.
Why the fuck would the DNC do that?
Oh right, they’re fucking morons.
She needs to fuck off
If she really wanted to be president she should have pushed Biden down some stairs and then immediately pardoned herself while she had the chance. She could have made a real funny decades in weeks moment happen all on her own, but she was too cowardly.

