this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
1120 points (96.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35322 readers
3991 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Imagine falling for this boomer rage bait when half the details are obviously and clearly censored.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 61 points 2 days ago (29 children)

I feel like I'm going insane reading these comments about how difficult it is to read analog clocks, how it needs too much understanding of maths, how it takes too long,...

Can someone please confirm: you just look, for a fraction of a second, at the clock face and know the time, right?

Learning to read the clock was like... A couple of lessons and some homework in the 2nd grade, and everyone got it.

[–] Jyrdano@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I can confirm. You are not insane.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am in the transition age range of people who have trouble reading analog clocks and I must admit I had trouble with it until I started wearing a watch as an accessory as a teenager. The issue isn't that it's hard, it's just something that you need practice at to do quickly and a lot of young people just don't look at analog clocks to tell time very often. It's not a matter of being stupid or not being taught how to do it, it's like mental "muscle memory" that just isn't built up in a world where digital clocks are everywhere, including in your pocket 24/7

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I feel like I'm going insane reading these comments about how difficult it is to read analog clocks,

Some of these comments are made by lazy idiots arguing that there is nothing wrong with being lazy idiot.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I had to check the community to verify I accidentally opened c/fakeconservativememes.

It was a relief when I realized this wasn't c/Lemmy Shitpost.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)
[–] Karl@literature.cafe 6 points 2 days ago

Some ppl who just badly want to be angry.

[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't really get it. Snopes says "mostly false", but then confirms that the UK made a recommendation to replace analog clock for digital ones because "some students had trouble estimating the remaining time".

While OOP is a shortcut/overgeneralization, it doesn't sound "mostly false" to me.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It could be to deal with learning disabilities not the average kid which makes it mostly false.

Also a recommendation doesn’t mean it happened.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 121 points 3 days ago (111 children)

First: Some UK teachers exchanged the analogue with digital clocks. This was only to reduce interruptions by some students (during a specific kind of UK exams), who had trouble determining the remaining time in the heat of the exam battle.

Secondly: The use of analogue clocks is taught at UK schools. What's missing is the practice that former generations of pupils had. No more wristwatches, public clocks all but gone, and (what I am nostalgically missing from my youth) no more peeking onto parked car's dashboards to read the analogue clock there. Times have changed, and this specific partially lost ability is not the schools' fault. (Not to say that other things aren't...)

Can we please bury that stupid old meme, as it has been based on some inaccurate buzz and largely giving a completely inaccurate impression of the topic from the start...

load more comments (111 replies)
[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Every year I taught for the past 30 years I have heard this but I will say that every year I had to go over how to read a clock at the beginning of the year and every time a kid would ask me what time it is I would point at the clock and ask them what time they think it is? At least they left the class knowing how to read a clock even though they were shit at writing essays.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

"Don't test for Covid, it will only make our numbers increase!" -Donald Trump, 2020.

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 3 days ago (29 children)

Analogue clocks are a great example of kids having to understand a concept and apply it. And it's simple enough that anyone can learn it.

I often see examples where children are required to memorize a set solution, instead of showing understanding and reaching the solutions themselves.

These clocks are somewhat dated, but removing them just feels like another symptom of a failing educational system.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Schools removing books as teenagers cannot read them.

[–] DeadMartyr@lemmy.zip 38 points 3 days ago (16 children)

I think removing everything that kids have a bit of a hard time trying to grasp just teaches kids to give up if anything isn't immediately apparent. Its not as much of a waste of time as cursive, and it's to be taught to think in another way.

I think that kids "learning how to learn" is really important, especially with how these AI models are stunting like a whole generation of people.

This is minor, but I also think less things need electronic displays/components that are hard to recycle and increase dependency on exploiting X country for Y resource. Its also cool to just be able to build a physical mechanism which digital clocks have no real feasible option to do

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Ive tried to teach my students (High School) how to read an analog clock. Keep in mind, I dont have time to teach a whole class on it, just a little lesson on how now and then when they ask what time it is. They can read it for the class, but the next day theyve forgotten how completely.

Its not because theyre stupid or lazy. Its because they rarely get practice with it. We know how to read an analog clock because, yes we were taught it in school, but they were everywhere so we essentially had practice with it all the time. These kids see digital clocks 99% of the time. So when do they ever apply their knowledge?

The only students who can read the clock are the handful who have analog watches for fashion reasons because they use it all the time.

Its a matter of practice but in truth these kids dont really have to read an analog clock in the modern world.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] toppy@lemy.lol 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Next schools will start removing textbooks because students cannot read. They will replace with audio books.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Father, I cannot click the book!

[–] Mickey7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

People reading this comment might think it's absurd. But sadly it is more than likely true and will happen soon. Why burden students with the hard work of learning - you might hurt their feelings

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (15 children)

This has got to be AI written or cherry picked data. They’re pulling clocks to save a few $ if anything. Old schools used to have synchronized analog systems. I could easily see those things being removed.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I loved when a class would get quiet enough to hear the seconds hand click on the mechanical motor. I lived to see how close it was to the end of minute. One time in class I counted how black dots were on the ceiling. Wow I was bored

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›