this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
47 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23761 readers
554 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I keep hearing about this guy. Who is he. Is he based or is he cringe

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He's an old old man who had his entire career destroyed for categorically disproving Alan dershowitzs lies about Israel and continuing to fight for Palestinians regardless. He has bad takes on trans people, which should be ignored because it's not what his work is about and he's so old he doesn't own a phone.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So he's based on Palestine but gets the wall anyway because there is no liberation without trans liberation. Fair enough

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i personally think that the man who has fought against the genocide of palestinians literally his entire adult life and had one bad take about trans people a couple years ago probably doesn't deserve to get executed by a revolution. asking this man to have takes on modern culture is just a dumb idea, and we should wall the people who got him to do it.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I personally don't think it's that hard to understand that liberation cannot be achieved for any oppressed group without liberation of every oppressed group

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

do you genuinely think trans liberation is contingent on either sacralizing or shooting an old man who has fought against the world's two best propaganda machines his whole life? i'm not saying he gets a "bad trans takes" pass, just that it's not a useful mental structure for building any kind of liberation. is your political project genuinely centered on finding jesus, or what?

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think liberation without intersectionality is impossible, yes

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

that's not what we're talking about though. of course general full liberation, whatever we mean by that, will require intersectionality. my point is that do you think it's actually worthwhile to discount every single person who has an uneducated and reactionary take that they spend very little time engaging with or defending? we're not talking about a politician, or even a regular garden variety everyday transphobe reactionary. we're talking about someone who has dedicated their entire life to trying to advocate for the specific and immediate case of palestinian emancipation. so we're not talking about hypotheticals or building a communist movement in any particular place. we're just talking about whether or not one should simply mentally dispose of the usefulness of norm finklestein despite his track record on the political situation of occupied Palestine.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can I ask why you're going to such great lengths to defend someone you have admitted yourself is a transphobe? Can you ask yourself why you thinking defending a transphobe is something that's somehow valuable to leftism?

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

CW: Mention of Domestic ViolenceI'm defending an academic who got kicked out of academia for crossing Alan Dershowitz, an academic that has spent the majority of his time getting literally slandered, libeled, and sued for defending Palestinians. So I'm not defending his transphobia, I'm saying that his transphobia is an extreme L on his part that is bad for his own cause. But I don't want to kill the man, and I think we have to consider him a genuine ally on the topic of Palestine. I'm not saying that all allies are allies on everything. Norm isn't even a communist. But he's also as old as my grandparents and didn't drop his transphobia until he already had dementia. So I hope I answered your question in good faith, I'll ask again, why do you think it's productive to hate this old man for not being based on everything? I agree that he shouldn't have said that shit. My grandma shouldn't tell me that i'll be mistaken for a girl for my long hair because that's regressive and limited. For some reason though, I care a lot more about my grandma's inability to have a meaningful material impact on my life and her life getting beaten by an alcoholic husband and that she has dementia. My point is that you seem to have this attitude that anyone that isn't perfectly progressive on all identifiable issues is equally monstrous, and that itself is insane protestant type brainworms. it would be like saying fidel-bat should get the wall for his history of opposing LGBTQ+ liberation in Cuba for many decades. can you ask yourself whether that's a reasonable standard for viewing people as valuable to leftism? i mean fidel even had a much larger impact on actual people because he wasn't just an academic on an unrelated issue saying some hateful shit in his old age. he was the leader of the cuban revolutionary and his opinions impacted policy, impacted actual people's lives for the worse.

[–] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Didn’t Stalin have bad takes on it too?

Let’s throw out the bath water with the whatever.

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago

yeah, i think holding up any single person for being good is stupid moralizing. we have stalin-pipe because we like his takes on dead nazis, not because literally everything he did was good and based. marx himself had plenty of reactionary ideas, obviously we all tend to find his work useful and moving regardless.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Stalin wasn't making videos about "gooning" in 2023, but yeah let's go ahead and hold them to the same standard because historical context isn't a thing.

Finkelstein has the time and energy to learn about and care about gooning enough to talk about it but doesn't have the time and energy to learn about and care about trans rights, and y'all are defending him like he's some liberation hero. Pretty fucked up

[–] Feinsteins_Ghost@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, you're obviously beyond reproach.

Almost like we contain multitudes. Except for you, natch.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago

I just wonder why you and others in this thread are SO PROUD to be defending a literal transphobe. Very strange stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

My dude, Finkelstein is an academic. He's supposed to have good takes relative to the general population and relative to non-academic radicals. Like, that's literally the role academics are supposed to play. "But Castro was homophobic!" Castro was too busy leading an army of militants that overthrew a comprador regime to be completely up to date on queer liberation. He's allowed to have a few bad takes here and there since he didn't sit on his ass all day reading books. And you quite conveniently left out the part where Castro did self-crit in front of the Cuban people for being a homophobic shithead and rightfully so. Where are we gonna see Finkelstein's self-crit for being a raging transphobic piece of shit? Castro had to lead a nation facing a genocidal blockage, but still found the time to realize he made a grave mistake. What's Finkelstein's excuse?

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, that's essentially the grounds on which i'm defending him in general. just that he's consistently been one of the lonest and loudest voices on are particularly important topic that's currently gotten heated up to active genocide again. he's also an old old man who's brain is melting. what i think is that no one should let him be near a camera again in his life because he said that dumb transphobic shit. also yeah, agreed on castro. i think castro improved himself greatly, especially on this issue, and i think it would have been the obvious counter to my point to mention that he was sort of busy not reading and actually dealing with shit. i understand that. but my general point is just that no one is orthodoxically perfect, and it's odd to expect a dying old man to put it together. like this post in general, do people think norm is encountering the term "gooner" while browsing the internet? it should be upsetting to people that someone taught him this word. that's essentially my only take i'm trying to have. that he's an old old man who probably doesnt deserve "the wall" for something he said after his brain started melting from his fucking ears. it's like parenti having had bad takes on the same in my opinion. if norm finklestein shows up saying transphobic slurs at my friends, i'll beat his wrinkly ass. but that's really just not what's going on in my opinion. i hope this doesn't come across as combative, i'm really just trying to sincerely talk about where the line should get drawn on how we think about certain people. maybe norm has been way more out and about on this than i think he was, and i'm basking in my own ignorance. i also recall he wrote a very stupid book about cancel culture, and it was something no one should have let someone in his condition write. but i'm not trying to put him on the pedestal, i'm not saying he shouldn't be consistently and regularly rebuked for his very bad takes. it just seems distracting to me considering the ongoing genocide at hand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Where are we gonna see Finkelstein's self-crit for being a raging transphobic piece of shit?

when dementia becomes curable?

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'll ask again, why do you think it's productive to hate this old man for not being based on everything?

Probably because I care a lot about my trans comrades and anyone who isn't their ally isn't mine either. It's a shame you don't, apparently. Intersectionality isn't that complicated and yet you are just rabidly defending a transphobe because he apparently has some good ideas on a topic that you care about more than trans rights

[–] WideningGyro@hexbear.net 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You are the only one coming off as rabid here. It's entirely possible to have a good faith conversation about this. Your interlocutor appears to be attempting that, and you're coming off as entirely hostile from the offset and unwilling to engage with the responses.

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

interlocutor

smuglord

Yeah sorry that I'm not being civil about defending my right to exist and the rights of many of my comrades and loved ones to exist. That's pretty low of me isn't it.

Oh wait, no, that's wrong. I'm not sorry at all. I'll never apologize for defending the rights of my loved ones to exist. Ever.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

For real, "you're coming off as entirely hostile from the offset and unwilling to engage with the responses", about whether or not you should be soft on this guy who thinks you should not exist. Calling you rabid about it. Not a very good look for them.

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago (10 children)

yeah this is not a useful attitude for leftists, friend. I care a lot about my trans comrades and I'm trying to stay polite when being accused of not. i hate transphobia and most transphobes, and most of all our society that materializes that social hatred against trans people. but please, for the love of god, try to be a better materialist about this. norm finklestein has had a meaningful material impact on people in favor of not supporting the genocide of palestinians. surely it's possible to understand the good he's done, the bad he's done, and the overall complexity of the person in question. are you trying to have a good faith discussion, or just attempting to make personal attacks? i want to make very clear, this man is not my hero, and i don't have personal heroes. i just reject the idea that you should discount literally everyone if they aren't a fully intersectional force for good. i recognize the vast amount of good he's done advocating for palestinians and the relatively small amount of damage he's done to trans people.

Just to be really really clear though:

Asserting that I care more about Palestinians than trans people is 1) a disgusting equivocation of two mostly unrelated movements for liberation and 2) almost a cruelly unserious thing to throw out there while over 10,000 Palestinians, half children, have been ethnically cleansed in the last month. We are literally only having this discussion because Norm is in the news advocating for a ceasefire and rights for Palestinians.

To put it in your style:

Palestinian freedom isn't that complicated and yet you're rabidly attacking a Palestinian advocate because apparently he had some bad ideas on a topic you care more about than the ongoing active bombing of a population center that is more dense than fucking Tokyo

I don't think that's reasonable, but it seems like that's how you're comfortable having a conversation with your comrades

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MorelaakIsBack@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

and even if he's not there, the math is really simple: you are really good at this one topic, you should be incredibly wary of making any statements on any other issues lest they make you look like a fucking asshole, lessening your impact on your main topic

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago

part of the reason why it was so extremely frustrating to see norm saying that shit when he did. he spent his whole life fighting for a most righteous cause of liberation, and then shot through a ton of goodwill with people by saying that shit and doubling down.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This was truly not enjoyable to learn given I just discovered the guy days ago and really respected what he did. I still do, but with the massive caveat that he probably doesn't want me to exist or some shit

[–] Llituro@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (6 children)

no it fucking blows. if he has more shit to say to the public about something other than palestinian liberation, he can shut the fuck up and die for all i care. because my trans friends and comrades are worth more than one cis guy's reputation. it just sucks considering how much effort he's put into advocating for palestinians that he had that dumb shit to say at all. it's like silvia federici to me i guess.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's a scholar of Israel and Palestine who has been very vocal about his support for Palestinian freedom. He more or less lost his academic career in a feud with Alan Dershowitz (the Dracula music should play in your head right now) because of his criticism of Israel. He's a pretty cool guy IMO, although he had some bad takes about trans people.

[–] dat_math@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

Bach is too good for Dersh

[–] SerLava@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is he based or is he cringe

Yes.

[–] Aryuproudomenowdaddy@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He was on Trueanon (ep 327) recently and it was pretty solid.

[–] hotcouchguy@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was fascinating how he's so absolutely meticulous in his writing, describing how he goes to such lengths to never get any detail even slightly wrong, so it doesn't give his opponents an easy gotcha.

And yet on other topics he just shoots from the hip with crazy old man takes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At any given point in time his state is a |based> + b |cringe>

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I didn't realize gooner meant something other than arsenal fan

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

anti-italian-discrimination gooning used ta be when ya went out wit da boss

[–] doublepepperoni@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought it meant you posted on somethingawful

Vice published an article on 'goon caves' a while back.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

che-laugh and then "this is fascist" at the end just chefs-kiss

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Never knew it until his TruAnon appearance, but he sounds like Jordan Peterson. As in tone and cadence, not the content of his speech.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

he sounds like an insight into jordan peterson's future

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›