this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
800 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26179 readers
2548 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A society is always about 3 days of hunger away from a violent revolution. Start your clocks.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Good, it is completely unnecessary. It's a bad solution to an old problem that already has much better solutions out there that are much more accessible too. They only made it so people will rely on them for everything and stop trusting others, but thankfully it failed. Canonical should be ashamed of themselves for ever trying this snap thing.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Risky joke, woosh is very likely.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a joke on how "Snap" is also an application distribution system for Linux. Ubuntu (by the company Canonical) uses it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

Fuck... I was squinting so hard up until I read that last sentence.

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

God, and I can't say this with my entire chest, fucking dammit. You got me.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 days ago

This is just outrageous. I'll have you know there are many single-mothers who depend on snap day-to-day. You can't honestly expect them to just switch distros.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Hah. I was ready to rage comment until I finished reading your whole comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SNAP has traditionally been entirely federally funded, but is administered by states. That means the shutdown's impact on SNAP and when benefits will start to dry up will vary state by state.

So about those government contracts for immigration, you would think some of those states that raked in a lot of money, could perhaps use that ill-gotten money to at least benefit the residents of their states.

Funny that Florida got more than half a billion dollars from the government the day before the shutdown, but they just can't find it within their hearts or their budget to use any of that money to feed families relying on food stamps in their state. Wonder where it's going instead?

[–] PillowTalk420@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wonder where it's going instead?

Alligators with freakin' laser beams attached to their heads for Alligator Alcatraz.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Fact: absolutely none of this would have happened if Kamala had won.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 14 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Shame she decided to support wildly unpopular policy and messaging instead of winning.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

I hated that she sounded like a politician dodging questions with nonsense answers. She should have been direct and stopped worrying about being a different direction than Biden.

But yes with all those flaws she would have been better than Trump by miles.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

But she was going to kill Palestinians with her bare hands!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This will destroy the US economy. I hope you like standing in bread lines...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

this is a disaster for the people affected (and also every society is 3 days without food before violent revolutions and all that) but also IMO these programs should ideally be paid for by the states anyways, not the federal government. i also think that taxes should go to the states instead of the federal government, and the states then forward whatever amount is appropriate to the federal government. that would make the states more resilient against these kinds of federal fraud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 51 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This administration needs to be concerned about what happens when you have millions of people with nothing to lose anymore.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (4 children)

yhea they want escalation.

but that doesn't mean the best strategy is to do nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 257 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

But it's OK: Kristi Noem gets two $170,000,000 private jets, Trump gets a golden ballroom, a luxury airliner and billions of dollars in bribes, Argentina gets $40,000,000,000, and ICE get all the weaponry they desire plus big fat bonuses for hitting their kidnapping targets. So as you sit hungry through the holiday season, know that your tax dollars are at least giving someone a good time.

[–] imposedsensation@lemmynsfw.com 118 points 4 days ago

Don't forget the $250 million that he feels he is owed by the DOJ for being prosecuted, which he intends to instruct the DOJ to settle and pay.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Let's instead phrase it that ICE gets more budget for militarization than the entire Israeli military.

Just let that sink in for a bit. ICE and resources allocated than the Israeli military.

It's the 16th most funded militarized force in the world.

Essentially equal to Canada's military budget.

Shits fucked

[–] Zier@fedia.io 167 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Just a reminder that no one steals food in America. If you thought you saw someone shoplifting food, no you didn't! That never happened, you imagined it, turn around and walk away, nothing to report here.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not American, but I totally didn't see someone shoplifting a couple of weeks ago and I just carried on with my business, but on the way out I heard another customer grassing them out. What is the world coming to?

You know what you hardly ever see - billionaires telling on each other for their crimes for no reason. Solidarity, people!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 122 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Republicans don't give a fuck if they kill people by withholding healthcare, obviously they don't give a fuck if people starve.

At some point the Democrats have got to realize this and start acting accordingly, but Democrats are still bending the knee: 13 Senate Democrats just voted to install a conservative judge in Alabama.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 199 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Did somebody say Bell riots? I thought I heard Bell riots.

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 84 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Star Trek future here we come, huzzah!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good we should stop paying our taxes.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

if there isn't a government, why pay taxes to it?

actually, stupid question. but what percentage of people could do a tax strike, resulting in the government having no funds or means to go after all of them. and collapsing?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's mostly going to be the elderly who suffer. People just forget about old people. They can't get out and go stand in line at food pantries.

Sometimes they don't have anyone checking on them very often.

Most don't know how to get online and find services and such.

If you have an elderly neighbor or family member. Try to check with them and see if they need help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The leopards! They hunger!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 126 points 4 days ago (19 children)

Thing is, it's gonna hit the rural MAGA folks the hardest.

There's a part of me that wants to go "I told you so.." which is expected..

But the more cunning part of me wants to leverage their hunger, dismay and rage and work to aim it squarely against Trump and the entire MAGA movement.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 124 points 4 days ago (3 children)

MAGA will blame the Ds and "libtards", because that's what they've been told to do.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] sampao@lemmy.ml 80 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Not an American but if the government shutsdown and they are cancelling programs, shouldn't you not have to pay taxes for that time period?

[–] Demonmariner@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Most working people have their estimated taxes deducted from their pay before they receive it. They don't have an option to not pay.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And with only one week for people to prepare. Smooth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Both sides.

BOOoOoTh SiIiiiiIIiiiiiiDESssssssssSsS!!

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Biden is old, you see, and there was also a woman who wasn't exactly adamant about Israel, so you have to starve now. But don't worry, if you starve enough, something will surely happen. And if not, at least there will be a civil war, isn't that great? You get to die in a random shootout, isn't that wonderful? So glad we didn't vote so this lady didn't win.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (3 children)

True, but as for the last part -

we didn’t vote

We actually did. The even more depressing reality is the last three presidential elections had the highest turnout of registered voters and young voters in American history.

What's fucked up is that exit polling showed that most people were entirely tuned-out and saw no difference between the candidates because most people don't watch the news or politics, most people are uninformed on basic science and reason, most people have curated social media feeds that push attention-span erosion and right-wing propaganda, and a good QUARTER of the adult population of America is functionally illiterate. Meaning studies have shown that 22% or more of adults in the US cannot read more than a couple words strung together or have to piece together sentences contextually. They can work, they can answer text messages, but are incapable of assembling paragraphs and forming complex abstractions.

We're fucked on a level that is hard to convey.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

the highest turnout of registered voters and young voters in American history.

This is one of the problems with how we've pushed the messages like "rock the vote", that you should vote, no matter what, or you're being a bad citizen.

If you can't be bothered to actually try to be informed, then you shouldn't feel pressure to vote. Sure, you should be allowed to vote no matter what, but no one should be pressuring you to vote even with lack of interest.

We should be emphasizing you should get to know the candidates up and down the ballot, not just getting your mark on a ballot.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›