this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
259 points (99.6% liked)

politics

26125 readers
3654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ex-congressman calls major renovation ‘utter desecration’ as demolition in East Wing reportedly under way

Construction crews have started demolishing part of the East Wing of the White House to make way for Donald Trump’s planned ballroom, prompting widespread criticism on social media and beyond.

One former lawmaker even called the renovation an “utter desecration”.

The Washington Post, which obtained and published photos of the demolition activity and cited two eyewitnesses, reported on Monday that demolition was under way, and shared an image showing construction in progress and parts of the exterior ripped down.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago

isn't it great? People can't afford to eat, millions are losing health coverage, and president douchenozzle is spending $250M on a fucking building. I hope he rots from the inside out.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago

Y’all remember when he said “It’ll be near it but not touching it and pays total respect to the existing building, which I’m the biggest fan of”. Just another lie. Go figure.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No President should be allowed to do this.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Disagree.

Burn that plantation house to the ground again.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Cool your tits, reverse-Sherman

[–] Kalon@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sure is making a lot of changes to a place that he will only be in for another three years.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

For some reason this led my mind towards thinking we should give him The Mummy treatment. Mummify him alive and stick the sarcophagus under a statue of Robert E. Lee.

He is doing it so he can troll the libs who say he is trying to be king even harder! He is building it ironically!

[–] selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Well to be fair the whole place is going to need to be demolished after that shit stain finally croaks. It's going to smell to high fucking heaven and full of gaudy ugly tacky shit.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Saw someone mention that this work would require govt contractors, who would be required to shut down due to the shutdown. So add it to the pile of illegality, in addition to archive and historical laws which are surely also being broken.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Years later, when Kellyanne Conway was mocked for being photographed crouching on a couch in the Oval Office (with her shoes on), Dobbs was apoplectic at the “venom of the left,” shocked that the liberal media would criticize Conway after their “deplorable hypocrisy” in giving Obama s pass for putting his big Black feet on the desk. Little-known fact: JD Vance later fucked that very same couch.

Emphasis mine

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

thank you for clarifying that only the emphasis is yours

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Do what I can

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wonkette truly is an under-appreciated national treasure. :)

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

This is my first time encountering them. Can definitely say it was a great read.

[–] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mar-a-Lago 2.0. Where's the massage parlor gonna be?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Plurrbear@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Next to the boxes of “Epstein files”…

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks just like the constitution

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully they build it better than Trumps condos.

[–] mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, him going lowest bidder and literally being crushed by a giant monument to his own fucking hubris would be rather poetic.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 days ago

You know he's going to pocket the money and stiff the contractor.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can't wait to see what the throne looks like.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

At least Canada doesn't have to do it this time!

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's just a building. It's his demolition of the Constitution that matters.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is visible representation of it.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If we want to go even deeper with the symbolism, the White House represents the power of the president and he is demolishing it in a shallow attempt to make it more grand.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's demolishing it to make it fit his tacky af taste. Ain't no grandeur being developed.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lots of brass and gold accents.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

The very definition of trumpery.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Fucking ignorant vandal.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When I think of how this Nixon-era listening device was able to compromise the White House for so long it really makes me wonder if the whole building has been unsafe for a decade for any national security purposes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(listening_device)

That didn't compromise the White House building, from your own link? I can see saying it compromised the White House in the sense of the executive branch.

It hung in the ambassador's Moscow residential study at Spaso House for seven years, until it was exposed in 1952 during the tenure of Ambassador George F. Kennan.[7]

If they don't burn the whole wing to the ground after he leaves they aren't paying attention.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

It annoys me the way he says himself and other donors when we all know he aint chipping in a dime.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

This time, it's a headline that isnt a metaphor, but I wish it was....

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is there really anyone who would be upset if the white house was burned down?

Why does anyone care about the desecration? The only story here is the huge waste of $$

[–] bobaworld@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, I think it would upset quite a few people. A lot of great men and women have worked and lived within its walls. It's a pretty meaningful symbol to Americans.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Like who?

The chattel slaves who were forced with violence to build it may be great, but they didn't live in it.