this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
223 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck AI

4399 readers
792 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm being required to use AI at work, and the first thing that jumped out at me was how often it says, "You're right!" That is like a drug for a narcissist.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Cockatiel looking into a mirror.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fire your boss who made AI a requirement.

The only use for AI is generation of trash. What's your job?

[–] tuckerm@feddit.online 2 points 4 days ago

Software developer. A bunch of software companies (maybe most of them now?) are insisting that programmers start using AI.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's so clearly not a finished or functioning product. In terms of art, I tried to use it as a tool, and it's useless. You can't make AI assisted videos or art, because it can't produce duplicates of anything. It can't stay on model, it can't use a set design to make anything. You can't plug in frames and ask for inbetweens, you can't give it a script and get comic panels, none of that works. You get random sloppy bullshit.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 12 points 1 week ago

When the goal is getting people to use it to jack up company investments then getting people to use it, even if forced, does mean it is finished and functioning in the context of the goals.

It certainly isn't functional for what it is advertised as though, as you pointed out.

[–] databender@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That cyborg vs synthetic battle was decent but I had my hopes higher after the build up

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm so pissed that they had every plot line ready to wrap up but then just fucking didn't.

It's so frustrating because any device to keep these plots going is just contrivance.

I'm so incredibly disappointed that they decided against an anthology and are continuing the Marcy plot.

If there's a season 2 I doubt it'll be good, I'm super disappointed.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I use a local deepseek-r1 instance for simple code refactorings and boilerplate (e.g. to generate obvious tests). Am I an asshat now?

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That depends... do you say obnoxious stuff like "AI let me 10x my productivity" or "You just need to right prompt, bro" or "AI will be good as soon as we build another trillion dollars in data centers"?

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nah, actually I kind of hate most genAI because it's mostly a copypaste machine that steals other peoples code and art and stuff. But I do use it still because it speeds up menial tasks a lot and I don't feel like I'm stealing shit from others that way.

[–] chosensilence@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i think it would do all of us a service to separate between generative AI and LLM assisted prompting.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Keep the human element. I've seen some use cases where AI can help solve a human problem with a human need. I usually see slop intended to boost other numbers, like social media engagement stats and SEO (need 3 pages of content for your spaghetti recipe? Good news! AI can help, and it can make the recipe too. Now one robot pleases another and the human need is an afterthought)

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use chat5-reasoning in cursor for code generation. I am also an asshat. But it's not because I use ai.

[–] JoshuaBrusque@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

That's the point the article made.

The most consistent predictors of AI use across studies were aversive personality traits (e.g., Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy).

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

That’s a gross over generalization but yes.